Wednesday, January 18th 2012
AMD-powered Sapphire Edge HD3 Nettop Said to Ship Next Month
After releasing two versions based on Intel Atom processors, Sapphire is now preparing an Edge HD nettop/mini PC which is based around an AMD APU (accelerated processing unit). Showcased at CES 2012, the AMD-flavored Edge HD3 is equipped with an E-450 chip (boasting two 1.65 GHz Bobcat cores and Radeon HD 6320 graphics), 4 GB of RAM, a 320 GB hard drive, LAN, 802.11 b/g/n WiFi, D-Sub and HDMI outputs, and USB 3.0 connectivity.
Reportedly, the Edge HD3 will become available on February 1st, priced at $300.
Source:
The Tech Report
Reportedly, the Edge HD3 will become available on February 1st, priced at $300.
21 Comments on AMD-powered Sapphire Edge HD3 Nettop Said to Ship Next Month
Its good to see something which isnt designed as a server/nas like the HP come to market at a good price point like this.
You AMD fanbois need to get your heads out of AMD's behind - Brazos was nice in 2010, in netbooks. Today it sucks just as much as Atom does and neither is usable on desktop. At least Atom crap is allegedly being developed further while AMD is apparently dumping Brazos in favor of low power Trinity.
BIOSTAR G41D3C LGA 775 Intel G41 Micro ATX Intel M... $45
Patriot 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333... $25
Seagate Barracuda ST320DM000 320GB 7200 RPM 16MB C... $85 (whoops, you seem to have forgotten the raping on HDD's anymore.)
HEC 6K28BBX585 Black 0.8mm SECC Steel MicroATX Min... $50 after MIR, including a questionable power supply, and small since you want to keep it out of sight.
SYBA CL-ADA24021 Thumbnail-size WiFi Adapter with ... $15 USB wifi connection
XFX HD-645X-YNH2 Radeon HD 6450 512MB 32-bit DDR3 ... $25 after MIR plus software. $6 shipping
$274, you still need interface devices, an OS, and other cables, and you have some mediocre parts in a box with a questionable power supply taking up four times the space.
There also is nothing wrong with an Atom or APU E series for daily desktop use for most people.
And if you want some fanboi to complain about, I recall the Sandy Bridge Pentium G620 struggling against similarly prized AMD parts. Actuall a Z-box is about the size of a Wii so his $30 thing would take up roughly 8 times the space.
You Intel fanbois need to get your heads out of your ass and release that Intel doesn't own every market segment nor does it have all of the best products. As it sits right now for me I would own an Intel desktop, AMD laptop, AMD netbook and AMD HTPC; Intel does not have things that compare in the same price point of performance envelope.
/Throws Patriot box office in the garbage.
Broadway Com Corp 1244MA-BLACK Glossy black Steel ... $30
Intel Pentium G620 Sandy Bridge 2.6GHz LGA 1155 65... $70
BIOSTAR H61MU3 LGA 1155 Intel H61 HDMI USB 3.0 Mic... $70
Mushkin Enhanced Silverline 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin ... $40
HITACHI HDS721050CLA362 (0F10381) 500GB 7200 RPM 1... $80
---
less than $290 for all your Farmville time-wasting needs
Toss in an optical drive to round it up to an even $300.
Somebody mentioned Ubuntu up in this thread. I am operating under assumption that if Ubuntu works for one option, it goes for the other as well.
The ONLY reason to go with a nettop would be because you're somehow power-constrained (yet you somehow can afford to run a monitor which uses just as much power alongside that box ...). You're going to save what, ~15W ? You give up quite some performance for it.
I'm not a fanboi of either CPU manufacturer, I'm just not blinded and can see where the value is. I would have advocated a similar system (but built around Athlon II and corresponding AMD motherboard) one year ago.
Oh and to the clown who claims that Pentium G620 has problems out-running any Brazos chip: CPU benchmark please or STFU. Thanks ;)
This isn't an argument you are being stupid comparing apples and oranges. As for the performance of that chip the onboard video on brazos is better no ifs ands or butts want proof google it yourself you have no issues making stupid newegg builds that no one gives a fuck about.
I will take option A.
A APU soundly kicks the shit out of this cheap intel in most tests, and wipes the floor with it in gaming, and shits on it all day long when you use actual rendering software and not benchmarks, and those require CPU performance as well don't they?
Sounds like a $300 little device is more poerful for the average consumer than your build is. Plus it should offer hardware accelerated post processing effects on video. Unlike the Intel, which offers little more than their older graphics do.
Also the Intel doesn't support 3D output...so if you planned on watching any 3D videos on your new TV you would be shit out of luck, unless you want to pay more for a graphics card.