Tuesday, February 18th 2025

Radeon 8060S Early Reviews: RTX 4070 Laptop-Class Performance in an iGPU

Well, the wait is over and early reviews for AMD's Strix Halo APUs have finally dropped. For those who kept up with the leaks and rumors, the high-end RDNA 3.5 Radeon 8060S iGPU was repeatedly rumored to features up to 40 CUs, allowing for raw performance that keeps up with several discrete-class mobile GPUs. Now that we have concrete information, it appears that the Strix Halo iGPU does indeed trade blows with mid-range mobile GPUs, which is an undeniably impressive feat for an integrated unit. Some of the fastest x86 iGPUs - the Arc 140 V, Radeon 890M, are all left in the dust, although Apple's highest-end offerings are unsurprisingly well ahead.

Starting off with 3D Mark Time Spy, the 40-CU Radeon 8060S, housed in the 13-inch ROG Flow Z13, managed an impressive score of 10,200 points according to Notebookcheck. This puts the iGPU in close proximity to other RTX 4070-powered 14-inch gaming laptops, such as the Zephyrus G14 which managed to rake in around 10,300 points. Compared to the previous iteration of the ROG Flow Z13, which boasts a 65-watt RTX 4070, the Radeon 8060S-powered Z13 pulls ahead by around 5%. Laptops with more substantial power envelopes do race ahead significantly, such as the 140-watt RTX 4070 Laptop-powered Razer Blade 14 which managed over 13,000 points. In the Steel Nomad benchmark, however, the Radeon 8060S appears less impressive, trailing behind not only the RTX 4070 Laptop, but also systems with the RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 W).
Compared to Apple's offerings, we are limited to a fewer number of GPU benchmarks. In 3D Mark Wild Life, for instance, the Radeon 8060S defeats the 20-core Apple M4 Pro GPU by the skin of its teeth, although the 40-core M4 Max and 38-core M3 Max are both well ahead, by 63% and 94% respectively. Moving to gaming performance, the Radeon 8060S continues to impress. Although it fails to match its predecessor's 65-watt RTX 4070 Laptop GPU in gaming, laptops equipped with RTX 4050 Laptop GPUs and low-end RTX 4060 Laptop GPUs are left behind. As Notebookcheck notes, the performance of the Radeon 8060S is neck-and-neck with the RDNA 3-based RX 7600M XT, which packs 32 CUs.
All told, the highest-end Strix Halo iGPU, the Radeon 8060S, clearly promises impressive performance. This APU will undoubtedly open new doors for mini PCs and compact laptops, offering true discrete-level performance. Multiple systems with Strix Halo APUs are already said to be in the works, plenty of which should hit the market soon enough. If the PugetBench scores are anything to go by, Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max continue to have the upper-hand in productivity performance, although Windows-specific workflows will greatly benefit from having a truly competent iGPU available in compact systems that do not compromise on portability, unlike the vast majority of gaming laptops.
Source: Notebookcheck
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Radeon 8060S Early Reviews: RTX 4070 Laptop-Class Performance in an iGPU

#2
aktpu
Cool, now we just wait for minisforum to do it's thing
Posted on Reply
#3
Daven
A power limited Ryzen 9950X plus a 4070M on a single package with 128GB of share 256-bit LPDDR5 8000 memory for less than 120W. Nice!

Only thing that would make it better is 3D cache.
Posted on Reply
#4
Zareek
This ASUS is more of a fat tablet than a full laptop and this thing still hits hard. It would be nice to see what it can do in a real 14/15" laptop chassis or even better a mini PC. I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole because it's ASUS and they'll find any reason they can screw you!
Posted on Reply
#5
JohH
That's pretty good result I think. M4 Pro is on N3E and this IGPU is on N4P.
Posted on Reply
#6
Cheeseball
Not a Potato


Once mine comes in next week, I'll see if I can hit it with RyzenAdj and force it above 120W TDP while keeping 90% EPP.
Posted on Reply
#7
NomadicMeow
Does anybody know how many watts it is pulling during these benchmarks?
Posted on Reply
#8
Philaphlous
Well I was considering getting a 2024 G14 with an RTX4060...Now seeing this..maybe it'd be worth it waiting a year or two if an igpu is going to be this powerful from now on...
Posted on Reply
#9
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
If someone would have said me 20 (or even 10) years ago that an iGPU can run games more than well, I'd probably have died of laughter. iGPU improvements have been way more interesting in the last years than the actual GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#10
Punkenjoy
Those large iGPU are the future of laptop or anything portable versus any dedicated GPU stuff.
Posted on Reply
#11
Sound_Card
PhilaphlousWell I was considering getting a 2024 G14 with an RTX4060...Now seeing this..maybe it'd be worth it waiting a year or two if an igpu is going to be this powerful from now on...
We are witnessing the beginning of the end for low to midrange laptop discrete GPU's.
Posted on Reply
#12
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Sound_CardWe are witnessing the beginning of the end for low to midrange laptop discrete GPU's.
Yep. When an iGPU can run games fine at 1080p60 (which is still the thing for majority), most users simply doesn't need more performance.
Posted on Reply
#13
usiname
The power consumption is really nice for the iGPU. It would be really nice if we see desktop motherboard with new chipset (almost zero chance) for 4 channel memory that support such chip. With proper DDR5 and memory tuning it can come close to desktop 4070, especially with higher power target
Posted on Reply
#14
10tothemin9volts
One of the most important metrics, especially since this will be used in mobile devices, but also generally this is a very important metric: Power efficiency improvement:
"Power Consumption / Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency":
Comparing to AMD Radeon 890M (RDNA 3.5), RX 8060S scores a 35% higher FPS per Watt value, according to the source, nice, bit this value can change drastically depending on which TDP values the tests were compared on and this value can be achieved even when comparing the same iGPU architectures. ... Nevermind, supposedly the RX 8060S iGPU is unfortunatelly RDNA 3.5, not RDNA 4.

PS: Unfortunatelly 128 GB (needs to be 256GB) unified memory (96GB RAM usable out of those for hosting LLM) is not enough for real DeepSeek quants.
Posted on Reply
#15
Rightness_1
I find the metric of comparing a laptop GPU to a laptop GPU confusing, as I don't own a laptop. Surely it would be far more interesting to compare it to a desktop part, as that is something 95% here could equate to. I bet there are more than a few people thinking that a 4070 laptop part performs identically to a 4070 desktop part when it does not, not even close, more like 30% not close...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 20th, 2025 14:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts