Tuesday, March 13th 2012
New NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Pictures Hit The Web
Courtesy of ChipHell we now have a couple of fresh pictures of NVIDIA's first Kepler-powered graphics card, the GeForce (or should we write' GeFORCE') GTX 680. Shot both from above and the back, the incoming card has a black PCB, a dual-slot/single-fan cooler, two (stacked) 6-pin PCIe power plugs, a couple of SLI connectors, and four display outputs - dual DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort.
The GTX 680 is equipped with one GK104 28 nm GPU, and reportedly boasts 1536 CUDA Cores, a 256-bit memory interface, 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM (4 GB models should also be in the works), PCI-Express 3.0, and a TDP of around 190 W. The GeForce GTX 680 is expected to be launched next week, on March 22nd. Its rumored price tag is $549.
Source:
ChipHell
The GTX 680 is equipped with one GK104 28 nm GPU, and reportedly boasts 1536 CUDA Cores, a 256-bit memory interface, 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM (4 GB models should also be in the works), PCI-Express 3.0, and a TDP of around 190 W. The GeForce GTX 680 is expected to be launched next week, on March 22nd. Its rumored price tag is $549.
76 Comments on New NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Pictures Hit The Web
Yes, 28nm yields are an issue now but it is not like these 'high-end' cards are going to see 'large' demand for AMD & nvidia, its the mid-range cards 200-300$ that see most of the demand. So, good yields or not, I feel it is unfair for both companies to raise the price points of their high-end cards. Hopefully, they will bring the prices down as the yields improve.
I don't like buying a card over 350, well I'll still wait, and see :)
Can't wait for next week.
which we wont :| are you thinking they will bastardise the 110 core to fill that range out like they are with this too?
after what they did with the 580 core they could do imo.
so, there is hope that more developers will try to make use of the true potential in discrete performance GPUs :cool:
But actually, we don't know the performance. If it's 15-20% faster, the HD7970 will need to go down for sure.
Instead yes, this is not good for us as the price is higher.
EDIT:to futher support my view on GK104 being a mid-range > www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26310-nvidia-aims-for-record-quarter (Massive margins on GK104)
Now the problem is that there's not enough of a performance jump for the money in lower segments as witnessed by the recent AMD offerings and I don't see Nvidia improving on this given the price and the estimated performance of their top card. So what I'm saying is that basically we pay the same amount of money for the same performance as last gen or we have to pay much more for a jump in performance. That's the catch here and not the fact that the top cards cost 550$.
580 GTX only supports 2, and i have to do SLi for 3 Screens :-(
Edit: They also play the games on max setting, so it kinda makes sense.
Also, there are rumors that Nvidia is pushing two to three times the transistors on a die size half that of the 580, yet by geometry alone that is impossible without a 3d transistor layout.
Simply put- we don't know which rumors may be true and which are not. While Nvidia did announce earlier they were "disappointed" with GCN, there is nothing which says they truly are. There is no proof to the point, merely a single statement.
Which should AMD cards prove faster, then all it would do is mean that Nvidia was trying to do was keep AMD cards from selling as much as they could. If kepler is so good, why the NDA? Nvidia should be touting benchmarks and proclaim how great their card is, not hide and let rumors abound about their card.
Because of this fact I believe that the 79xx-killer rumors are likely going to be down-turned. By the rumored architecture design, it should prove to be similar to the 7870 in most respects. And the 7870 outperforms the 7970 in Crysis 2. Which also means that AMD likely has driver issues (big surprise?) with the 79xx series.
However, the main thing I am doubting on is the performance/watt, so we'll see how it turns out. All these rumors just play to Nvidia by making people who would otherwise buy AMD now wait until kepler is released to make a decision, which means that AMD won't have quite as high 2st quarter profits. Also note that Nvidia has the NDA held until near the end of the 2st quarter? Seeing as the NDA ends on the 22nd, and the 2nd quarter ends on the 31st. Oh and that means that most people won't hear the news until the end so that means that Nvidia gets to keep AMD profits down.
Think about it. If Kepler is a flop, then this gives Nvidia a little more buffer until they're able to get their mobile cards out, where they have deals with OEMs in place and they're able to start making profit, without loosing too much to AMD in the performance desktop end.