Wednesday, July 3rd 2013
AMD Readies a Pair of Energy-Efficient Socket FM2 APUs
AMD's A-series "Richland" APUs are great to have in HTPC builds, but their 65W to 100W TDPs can be a put-off for some. The company is working on a pair of energy efficient socket FM2 APUs based on the silicon, with TDP rated at 45W. The first of the two is the A10-6700T, which features a significantly lower CPU clock speed of 2.50 GHz, with an unknown TurboCore speed; and GPU clock speed of 720 MHz. It's not known if the chip is dual-core or quad-core, but given that quad-core non-K A10-6700 rates in at 65W, it's not improbable for A10-6700T to be one, as well. Also unknown is the stream processor count. Moving on, we have the A8-6500T. Its CPU clock speed is further lowered, to 2.10 GHz, and GPU to 720 MHz, like the A10-6700T, its CPU and GPU core/SP counts are under the wraps.
Source:
Guru3D
80 Comments on AMD Readies a Pair of Energy-Efficient Socket FM2 APUs
It's far from rosy.
but its whatevs.
The result more green tax for us,
Very valid point though , put your 100tdp chip in powersave with all eco features on and they would not use much more than these anyways.
i have a 95W cpu and mine maxes out at 45C. if i had an aluminium block for a heatsink, i would achieve 100C
btw, 80c is impossible. it will shut off after 71C ;)
temps mean shit my main rigs oc never breaches 62 degrees..... @1.48CPUV
how do you call this leaky even 100 watts tdp is amazeing given the total package performance , the cpu is fine for what it is the gpu is great for what it is and at typical idle values totaling 40-100watt for the whole system compared to intel they are doing ok
imagine an Amd or arm for that matter in process node parity with intel and its clear , intels ahead by a nose/node.
Also AMD has been shipping out 95W CPU's with the aluminum non-heatpipe coolers for a while. They don't "achieve 100C" they run under 60C, but the fan is screaming in warmer climates.
scroll down to CPU load temps ;)
max temp before thermal shutdown is 74C on that chip. so either he exaggerated, or was using onboard sensors and software to monitor temperatures, which are never really 100% accurate.