Friday, September 27th 2013
Radeon R9 290X Could Strike the $599.99 Price-point
AMD's next-generation flagship graphics card, the Radeon R9 290X, could strike a US $599.99 (or 499.99€, £399.99 before taxes) price-point, turning up the heat on the more expensive offerings by NVIDIA - GeForce GTX 780 and GTX TITAN. The card should be available from mid-October. Based on the new 28 nm "Hawaii" silicon, the card is expected to feature 2,816 GCN stream processors, spread across 44 SIMDs (11 computing units). Other specifications include 172 TMUs, 44 ROPs, and a 512-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 4 GB of memory, which likely achieves its >300 GB/s memory bandwidth with a 5.00 GHz memory clock. The company is expected to launch 6 GB variants of the card a little later.
Source:
Softpedia
95 Comments on Radeon R9 290X Could Strike the $599.99 Price-point
"AMD Radeon R9 290X will support new technology TrueAudio, a truly programmable audio technology for game developers."
I was watching the stage demo in Hawaii yesterday and couldn't help but be skeptical whether everyone would even be able to take advantage of this feature, since it's common that many can't even successfully get HDMI audio out of their current cards, myself included.
In VLC you can easily select audio outputs.
I assume you meant switching back and forth was a pain in the ass.
But it is easier to complain and whine, instead of doing something productive isn't it?
Have you tried to RMA your card, different HDMI cable, has the issue occured with different drivers?
oh and i've never had HDMI audio issues either - generally a bad receiver is the issue, or people not understanding the technology and its limitations (stuff like TV's having only 2.0 output, receiver before TV, etc)
7970 and 7950 were released ~10 days apart...
680 and 670 were 2 mo. apart...
They are not all just fused off chips... the die is smaller... a spread of performance is important.
BTW: The 7970 was paper-launched on the 22nd December, availability was from the 9th January, and the 7950 launch on the 31st January. Yeah? You got some proof of that?
Is Tahiti LEa physically smaller die than Tahiti XT?
Is GK104-300 physically smaller than GK104-400?
Is Cayman CE physically smaller than Cayman XT?
Is GF110-270 physically smaller than GF110-375?
Is Cypress LE physically smaller than Cypress XT? Well, if this to be believed the NDA lifts on the 15th October. Could be anxious two week wait for those who stump up their credit card info for the pre-order.
I don't think I've ever bought something that I didn't know the price of, and didn't know the specifications of at the time I made payment. Don't think I ever will.
[May the source be with you]
BTW:
592$ for preordering a Saphire 290X
www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/shop.cgi?action=thispage&thispage=0110040015013_BTF3729P.shtml&order_id=!ORDERID!
I don't have problems at 1080, but it does take 2 cards. One will not work. Dropping under 60 fps is not acceptable, which, you left out. Minimum framerate is important, not the average or max.
Also, I have an OCed spintel 4670k, too. It's not any faster. And I believe nothing that Tom's or Anand says, EVER, unless it's substantiated elsewhere (they've been shills for way too long).
I won't be buying it b/c of EA, but Battlefield 4 beta never drops under 60 fps maxed at 1080, so I guess that's good news for a lot of people.
R9-290X for 615-670€
geizhals.at/eu/./?cat=gra16_512&xf=1440_R9+290X#xf_top
R9-290 for 500-550€
geizhals.at/eu/./?cat=gra16_512&xf=1440_R9+290#xf_top
www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-015-AM&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1752