Friday, March 27th 2015
NVIDIA Readying GM200-based GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA is preparing its second GeForce graphics card based on its 28 nm GM200 silicon, which powers the $1,000 GTX TITAN-X. There are several rumors surrounding what NVIDIA could name the card. Some sources suggest NVIDIA could name it the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, while others point at names such as the GTX 990 (to set it sufficiently apart from the smaller GM204-based GTX 980).
The SweClockers report that sides with GTX 980 Ti for the name, mentions that the card could feature the chip's full complement of 3,072 CUDA cores, but feature 6 GB of memory, compared to 12 GB on the GTX TITAN-X. The memory bus width will stay at 384-bit. NVIDIA could allow its add-in card (AIC) partners to come up with custom-design cards, and so we could expect some cards with meaty cooling solutions (that keep the chip away from its 84°C temperature-throttle), and factory-overclocked speeds, to make the GTX 980 Ti even faster than the GTX TITAN-X. NVIDIA could time its launch with AMD's launch of the Radeon R9 390X.
Source:
SweClockers
The SweClockers report that sides with GTX 980 Ti for the name, mentions that the card could feature the chip's full complement of 3,072 CUDA cores, but feature 6 GB of memory, compared to 12 GB on the GTX TITAN-X. The memory bus width will stay at 384-bit. NVIDIA could allow its add-in card (AIC) partners to come up with custom-design cards, and so we could expect some cards with meaty cooling solutions (that keep the chip away from its 84°C temperature-throttle), and factory-overclocked speeds, to make the GTX 980 Ti even faster than the GTX TITAN-X. NVIDIA could time its launch with AMD's launch of the Radeon R9 390X.
209 Comments on NVIDIA Readying GM200-based GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Economics
Particularly in the early 19th century, several utopian ideas arose, often in response to their belief that social disruption was created and caused by the development of commercialism and capitalism. These are often grouped in a greater "utopian socialist" movement, due to their shared characteristics: an egalitarian distribution of goods, frequently with the total abolition of money, and citizens only doing work which they enjoy and which is for the common good, leaving them with ample time for the cultivation of the arts and sciences. One classic example of such a utopia was Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward. Another socialist utopia is William Morris' News from Nowhere, written partially in response to the top-down (bureaucratic) nature of Bellamy's utopia, which Morris criticized. However, as the socialist movement developed it moved away from utopianism; Marx in particular became a harsh critic of earlier socialism he described as utopian. (For more information see the History of Socialism article.) In a utopian society, the economy, concurrent with the ongoing theme, is perfect; there is no inflation, and perfect social and financial equality. However, in 1905 H.G. Wells published A Modern Utopia, which was widely read and admired and provoked much discussion. Also consider Eric Frank Russell's book The Great Explosion (1963) whose last section details an economic and social utopia. This forms the first mention of the idea of Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia
It's a BUSINESS. Otherwise they would be a NPO. It's unbelievable your lack of knowledge of economics. That in itself would be fine if you weren't spouting off and showing the world how ignorant you are of how things are.
If some people are willing to pay 1K for cards for living, why would everyone else have to do the same?
And why should I stay with low-end card because I wasn't born in a country which sucks the resources from the whole globe, like the states or some western countries with colonies?
It's the ugliest discrimination based on country of origin.
Because you do nothing and can afford everything and I can have two-three jobs and not sleeping, risking my health, for surviving and not being able to afford.
Think like humans, not like evil profit-oriented reptiles.
If while working two or three jobs you can't afford high-end equipment, you do what a lot of people (including several that purchase $1k+ cards); live within your means. Either figure out a way to make more money to buy the toys you want, or be content with what you can afford.
I can't drop $1k on a GPU, but you don't see me complaining that Nvidia shouldn't charge what people are willing to pay.
Evil profit oriented reptiles? Who are you to judge other people for what they can or cannot afford? Who gave you that right? How old are you? 12?
News flash: some people bust their asses to earn their money day in and day out, all around the world, some were fortunate enough to be born in countries were luxury goods are readily available for those who can afford them, some people don't have that fortune. Some like me fought their way up to leave their countries of origin and were lucky enough to be able to move to a country where honest hard work is properly recognized and mostly well rewarded.
But for you to pass judgement on other human beings just based on such a frivolous thing as being to able to buy a expensive video card, or the corporations that charge pretty penny for such things, that is just plain wrong.
Did your parents teach you to throw rocks at people driving by on a Mercedes or a BMW just because they can afford it? No, right?
Get a life, there are way more important things in life than wasting your time passing judgment on people just because they like sharing their opinion on a tech forum.
I'm done with this thread, I tried, in a constructive way to contribute to it, even replying to some people criticizing me and other fellow forum users, with mostly respectful posts, but some people are just trolls, cannot be reasoned with, some people just want to see the world burn.
As far as the original topic, I've said it before, and I say it again: I'm extremely excited about Nvidia releasing the 980ti, if the level of performance I can get with my current card can be enjoyed by others at a much lower price, then the more power to my fellow PC gamers! :rockout:
Same for the 390X, I really hope the card can be every bit as fast as people expect it to be, who knows, if it is so, and is relatively affordable, it may even find a home in my current CF 290X rig. God knows AMD needs every single break they can get, and WE need a healthy AMD to keep both Intel and Nvidia in check.
I said the exact same thing when the 780Ti and 290X came out, live and let live man, we are all fellow gamers, part of a thriving community, let's just focus on what matters the most and realize we live in exciting times for anyone who enjoys gaming :rockout:
Perhaps Sony is actually a kid, which could explain it and we could cut him some slack if we knew that to be the case.
@Sony Xperia S are you a kid?
While I still don't think the titans are worth the asking price, others do and that's ok. While, technically, I think the 970 and 980 are mid-range GPUs by naming scheme - their performance is comparable to the top tier of their competitors. It is crappy but also truly amazing what they have done with their products to be able to have a "mid range" card compete with top tier hardware from AMD.
That said, my 6850's are beyond their usefulness so whether the 980 is my next card, or the 390, life will be good.
For the record, I can't really afford the titan but I certainly do not believe I am entitled to purchase one for what I can afford, that is ludicrous. And yes I have a nice fat debt since I am paying for my BS degree.
One of the most prefered and valued partners (better than working with expensive western europe products) and I will push for strong partnership in that direction.
In this case it is absolutely fair that China was and will be the world's top economy.