Friday, June 19th 2015
![AMD Radeon Graphics](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/amdradeon-v1723816949774.png)
Radeon R9 Fury X Faster Than GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K: AMD
AMD, in its press documents, claimed that its upcoming flagship single-GPU graphics card, the Radeon R9 Fury X, will be faster than NVIDIA's recently launched GeForce GTX 980 Ti, at 4K Ultra HD resolution. This puts to rest speculation that its 4 GB of video memory hampers performance against its competitor with 6 GB of memory. From the graph below, which was extracted from AMD's press material, the R9 Fury X will be faster than the GTX 980 Ti, in even the most memory-intensive games at 4K, including Far Cry 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Crysis 3, Assassins Creed: Unity, and Battlefield 4. Bigger gains are shown in other games. In every single game tested, the R9 Fury X is offering frame-rates of at least 35 fps. The Radeon R9 Fury X will launch at $649.99 (the same price as the GTX 980 Ti), next week, with market availability within the following 3 weeks.
Source:
The TechReport
102 Comments on Radeon R9 Fury X Faster Than GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K: AMD
until some actual third party reviews......
They claimed 54 fps, quite a big difference.
In other words, 5 more days. But I have no doubt it'll be fast, probably faster, stock versus stock but I doubt in all games. If it actually is faster then that's good because it means they've conquered Nvidia's Gamehurts.
But, remember the Norsemen.
I'm not excited, but I have a small warm, fuzzy feeling that says "Go AMD, go!"
now if the fury X is effectively faster at 4k and the Titan X is marginally faster than a 980Ti ... then the Fury X will be in line with the Titan X (case to case scenario) and cost less since price aligned to the 980Ti ...
yep the Fury line turn out quite good in the end (albeit having 4gb... but it's like nvidia with they magic "we don't need a 512bit memory bandwidth" after all a 256bit card was on par/beating slightly a 512bit card, despite having 3.5gb but it's another story...)
waiting for the reviews and SPECIALLY the NANO
Unless you are thinking AA is not used in AMD's slide but is used in the one in this article, could be, could also be that AMD was rather generous with their earlier claims.