Thursday, May 5th 2016

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Put Through 3DMark

Some of the first 3DMark performance numbers of NVIDIA's upcoming GeForce GTX 1080 graphics card made it to Futuremark's online database. The results page hint at samples of the GTX 1080 running on early drivers, on two separate machines (likely from two different sources). The first source, who ran the card on a machine with a Core i7-5820K processor, scored P19005 on 3DMark 11 (performance preset). The second source, who ran the card on a machine with a Core i7-3770K processor, scored 8959 points on 3DMark FireStrike Extreme. Both scores point at GTX 1080 being faster than a GTX 980 Ti.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

163 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Put Through 3DMark

#151
Prima.Vera
My guess is that HBM2 will be used a little later for the new Titan, and maybe 1080Ti (really hope so) :)
Posted on Reply
#152
Fluffmeister
The GP100 is currently lapping up the HBM2 supply for Nv's big bucks HPC client deals.
Posted on Reply
#153
william_homyk
The question is how do these benchmarks compare to a 980 Ti. The 27,000 score is from 3dmark 11 ( an old 720p test) which My 980 Ti SC+ scores a 26,000 and the Fire strike extreme score (1440p) of 10,000 which my 980 Ti SC+ got 9200 on. For reference My 980 Ti is OC to 1,300 MHz over its 1191 base clock. I’ll be generous and go by the stock benchmarks the 980 Ti gets in Firestrike Extreme (8500) and 3D Mark 11 (24,500). So at best your getting a 15-20% increase over a stock 980 Ti and for someone with an overclocked 980Ti your basically getting a no percent increase.
Posted on Reply
#154
EpicGrog
RejZoRNumbers mean nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare them with. Can someone also post numbers for current gen cards using similar system?
Im getting 12,168 with 2 GTX 980's SLI on Firestrike Extreme. Thats with a 12 Core Xeon @ 4.5 Ghz on an Asus ROG x58!
Posted on Reply
#155
TheHunter
This is 980ti @ factory boost 1405mhz,

www.3dmark.com/fs/8357945
Graphics Score 9 340
Physics Score 13 411
Combined Score 4 214


around 700points (or maaybe 2-3fps) behind that 1850mhz 1080gtx.. If that's base freq. then it means its oc'ed too.. Well I assume that since both 780gtx and 980ti reads base freq.
Posted on Reply
#156
medi01
xviFrom a marketing perspective, they wouldn't want the x80 slot empty in their lineup only to be filled in a while later.
Dude. Fury.
Ti was to spoil it.
Posted on Reply
#157
redeye
I looked up my benchmark
www.3dmark.com/fs/5090497
and if the 1080 benchmark is not bogus... The gtx 1080 will be equivalent to two GTX 980's ...

firestrike extreme... www.3dmark.com/fs/5090798


interesting... My Oc firestrike ultra bench
www.3dmark.com/fs/5311970
Is 6240, compared to the "leaked" gtx1080 oc score of 6232. See the post below...
Is 5750 Non-oc benchmark (mine) www.3dmark.com/fs/5153181

Of course, when when you set the render output(resolution tp 1080p )in 3dmark ultra and use a 4k gsync monitor (xb280) you can get a boost in the score to 6156 (gtx980SLI stock) www.3dmark.com/fs/5153245http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5153245

I REALLY hope thar a 1080 is equal to a SLI980!... The buttery smoothness that is a single card is heaven!
(OTOH hand as long as the min fps on a single card gtx980 does not go below 30fps, the SLI is "smooth")
Posted on Reply
#159
D007
Frankly the 600 dollar card should be the TI and these people have been ripping us off, for far too long. Do not expect results as good as they have been stating.. I'm calling bullshit..
Posted on Reply
#160
medi01
D007600 dollar card
Last time I checked it was 699$, no less, any time soon.

But that's a fair price for 10x Maxwell. (Although, Maxwell was in no way lesser physicist, than Pascal, I'd say, rather on the opposite)

Posted on Reply
#161
TheHunter
^^
That has nothing to do with GTX 1080..Its only by Double precision and FP16 deep learning CUDA apps.. A misleading slide imo.
Posted on Reply
#162
D007
medi01Last time I checked it was 699$, no less, any time soon.

But that's a fair price for 10x Maxwell. (Although, Maxwell was in no way lesser physicist, than Pascal, I'd say, rather on the opposite)

What you call "fair" I call price gouging..
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 20:43 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts