Thursday, June 30th 2016

AMD Launches Radeon.com

With its Radeon RX 480 launch, AMD launched the new Radeon.com website, as a centralized source of product information, updates, and software downloads. The site also features articles related to AMD gaming hardware, and is the second such website by the company after game.amd.com. It appears to feature a similar design scheme to the new Radeon Settings app that ships with Radeon Software Crimson Edition.
Add your own comment

22 Comments on AMD Launches Radeon.com

#2
The Quim Reaper
If their actual cards themselves were as good as their self promotion and marketing, they'd be number one for sure.

But they aren't, and they're not.
Posted on Reply
#3
RejZoR
Their driver naming is pathetic. "Driver Software Crimson Edition" What the hell was wrong with AMD Catalyst? It sounded badass. This now is too long and too stupid.
Posted on Reply
#4
AsRock
TPU addict
RejZoRTheir driver naming is pathetic. "Driver Software Crimson Edition" What the hell was wrong with AMD Catalyst? It sounded badass. This now is too long and too stupid.
Did your mother never tell you not judge a book by it's cover ?.
Posted on Reply
#5
dorsetknob
"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
AsRockDid your mother never tell you not judge a book by it's cover ?
If your not taught to read then you do judge books by their covers :)
Picture books anyone :):)
Posted on Reply
#6
RejZoR
That doesn't change the fact the name they chose is stupid. Old "Catalyst" ignites the reaction between a graphic card and a game aka A DRIVER. It not only sounded cool, it actually meant something. Crimson just means nothing at all (apart from describing a color which isn't even from AMD's or Radeon's color scheme). Plus all the other unnecessary meaningless words around it.
Posted on Reply
#7
m0nt3
Radeon Settings is the name, Crimson is just an edition, i know doesn't make much sense to me. I don't think crimson replace catalyst. If you right click on desktop to open the control center it says AMD Radeon Settings where it use to say AMD Catalyst.
Posted on Reply
#8
GhostRyder
This is kinda interesting as the site looks fine. Though I find it funny how you click the drivers and it just takes you to the old page...
Posted on Reply
#9
ZoneDymo
RejZoRThat doesn't change the fact the name they chose is stupid. Old "Catalyst" ignites the reaction between a graphic card and a game aka A DRIVER. It not only sounded cool, it actually meant something. Crimson just means nothing at all (apart from describing a color which isn't even from AMD's or Radeon's color scheme). Plus all the other unnecessary meaningless words around it.
I agree, even if it was called "Radeon software", I mean sure, its understandable for everyone but its very boring.
Catalyst was a better name (and imo a far superior UI at this point).
Posted on Reply
#10
GhostRyder
RejZoRThat doesn't change the fact the name they chose is stupid. Old "Catalyst" ignites the reaction between a graphic card and a game aka A DRIVER. It not only sounded cool, it actually meant something. Crimson just means nothing at all (apart from describing a color which isn't even from AMD's or Radeon's color scheme). Plus all the other unnecessary meaningless words around it.
I am pretty sure the only reason they changed it is because of people view on the companies drivers. Look how many people still claim the drivers are bad, they had to launch a new name to try and show its a new eco-system. Kinda like how some car names disappear from manufacturers because of bad reputations in to a new car regardless of if this car is the same general size and spot in the category.
Posted on Reply
#11
AsRock
TPU addict
dorsetknobIf your not taught to read then you do judge books by their covers :)
Picture books anyone :):)
Then what are they doing here if they cannot read the forum never mind installing some thing that you cannot read :p.

Anyways picture books are good i only said the cover and tbh the newer version is better regardless of the name not if i had issue's with the old.
Posted on Reply
#13
dorsetknob
"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
AsRockThen what are they doing here if they cannot read the forum
Wuck knows
there are so many threads Here where posts are made by people that do not read the thread :) before posting
sometimes reading threads is so confusing when "THOSE PEOPLE POST
Yeh they know who they are :)
Posted on Reply
#14
Fouquin
RejZoRTheir driver naming is pathetic. "Driver Software Crimson Edition" What the hell was wrong with AMD Catalyst? It sounded badass. This now is too long and too stupid.
nVidia still doesn't even NAME their drivers, just a WHQL cert then a number. At least RTG tried.
Posted on Reply
#15
TheoneandonlyMrK
RejZoRThat doesn't change the fact the name they chose is stupid. Old "Catalyst" ignites the reaction between a graphic card and a game aka A DRIVER. It not only sounded cool, it actually meant something. Crimson just means nothing at all (apart from describing a color which isn't even from AMD's or Radeon's color scheme). Plus all the other unnecessary meaningless words around it.
You not updated drivers in a while,its been called crimson edition a while now, it's not that bad.
Posted on Reply
#16
Slizzo
The Quim ReaperIf their actual cards themselves were as good as their self promotion and marketing, they'd be number one for sure.

But they aren't, and they're not.
I don't know, price per performance AMD has been doing quite well on. Even the RX480 has a good price/performance ratio.
Posted on Reply
#17
thesmokingman
dorsetknobWuck knows
there are so many threads Here where posts are made by people that do not read the thread :) before posting
sometimes reading threads is so confusing when "THOSE PEOPLE POST
Yeh they know who they are :)
It's a lot more adventurous posting off the cuff, on the fly for the fun?
Posted on Reply
#18
EdInk
Wattman:banghead:
Posted on Reply
#19
$ReaPeR$
cool! the UI is much better.
Posted on Reply
#20
nem..
The Quim ReaperIf their actual cards themselves were as good as their self promotion and marketing, they'd be number one for sure.

But they aren't, and they're not.


Posted on Reply
#21
suraswami
Is this the beginning of Radeon spin out from AMD?
Posted on Reply
#22
Recon-UK
I miss ATi catalyst, oh AMD :(

RX 480 still looks a good buy to me though.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 20th, 2024 10:26 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts