Tuesday, August 2nd 2016
![NVIDIA](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/nvidia-v1721205152158.png)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal Available from Today
NVIDIA's flagship graphics card targeted at gamers and PC enthusiasts, the TITAN X Pascal, will be available from today, exclusively through the GeForce website, at this page. NVIDIA will be directly marketing the card. The card is priced at US $1,199 (excl taxes). Based on the 16 nm "GP102," derived from the "Pascal" architecture, the TITAN X Pascal features 3,584 CUDA cores, 224 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5X memory, holding 12 GB of memory. The chip is clocked at 1417 MHz core, with 1531 MHz GPU Boost, and 10 Gbps memory, working out to 480 GB/s memory bandwidth. Like the GTX 1080 and GTX 1070, the TITAN X Pascal appears to be limited to 2-way SLI.More pictures follow.
128 Comments on NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal Available from Today
Edit: Well...I can't get through to even attempt to order it... Been clicking "Buy Now" over and over again to no avail.
Edit 2: NVM, got it to work by going to the store directly and adding to the cart. Its now letting me checkout.
All you get today "DLC" type cards. The only difference is that; now they release the cut versions first and the non-cut later and at higher prices points. When their CEO said the GTX1080 is as fast as 2x TITANS, that simpleton got confused with this GTX TITAN card. Watch and observe carefully, the benchmarks won't lie.
The problem that nVidia needs to realize is; (and other people on this shit hole) if you lie, you need more lies to cover for that lie.
A few months from now, once the yields improve, they'd release a fully enabled Titan X Black or something.
A new design always has yield issues and those iron out over time. If Nvidia was to look at yields today, they would have taken the GP104 and called it GP100. Good yields, fully enabled, top tier chip, everyone happy. But that leaves no room to stretch legs when the process matures and you can build better/more complex chips. You'd have to build them again (and test, and everything). Instead, Nvidia is doing the opposite: a chip that they know will have yield issues gets some parts disabled and is sold as such. When yields get better, the new product is already there.
I'm pretty sure if Polaris scaled, AMD would have gone the same route. Because it's economically sound.
The best has always had a large price attached, no matter the brand.
What do you think people go by then? The manufacturer's press release? Tech site reviews and TPU in particular, make great reviews that allow the buyer to make an informed choice when choosing a graphics card, especially when it's expensive.
I'm not certain but I think AMD cards are better at compute with fp64 hence their use in mining and folding.
EDIT: But by God, benchmark it on our forums as soon as you have it :toast: Kind of true. But even more, it's got hardware (or software) specific to neural learning. It's intended to be leveraged for AI work.
But I agree, a lot of people will buy it for the gaming aspect which is absolutely fine if you can afford it. I'm almost tempted but that price is too high for my principles.
There will come one more Titan this serie, with 16GB HBM2. but Q1/Q 2017.
I blame AMD for all this.