Tuesday, August 23rd 2016

Samsung Bets on GDDR6 for 2018 Rollout

Even as its fellow-Korean DRAM maker SK Hynix is pushing for HBM3 to bring 2 TB/s memory bandwidths to graphics cards, Samsung is betting on relatively inexpensive standards that succeed existing ones. The company hopes to have GDDR6, the memory standard that succeeds GDDR5X, to arrive by 2018.

GDDR6 will serve up bandwidths of up to 16 Gbps, up from the 10 Gbps currently offered by GDDR5X. This should enable memory bandwidths of 512 GB/s over a 256-bit wide memory interface, and 768 GB/s over 384-bit. The biggest innovation with GDDR6 that sets it apart from GDDR5X is LP4X, a method with which the memory controller can more responsively keep voltages proportionate to clocks, and reduce power-draw by up to 20% over the previous standard.
Source: ComputerBase.de
Add your own comment

57 Comments on Samsung Bets on GDDR6 for 2018 Rollout

#51
BiggieShady
medi01But let's compare 1070 vs 970 and 1080 vs 980, to get bogus higher "improvement" numbers, shall we.
Yes, why wouldn't we look at generational improvement this way, and include separate metric called performance per dollar just for you ... oh wait we have that already
Posted on Reply
#52
medi01
BiggieShadyYes, why wouldn't we look at generational improvement this way compare cards from different price tiers
FTFY
Posted on Reply
#53
BiggieShady
medi01FTFY
I have an idea, why don't we stop derailing this thread since we aren't even talking about the same thing :slap:
Posted on Reply
#54
medi01
Real comparison, AIB vs AIB about 20% improvement for cards at roughly the same price:

1070 vs 980
1080 vs 980Ti
www.computerbase.de/2016-08/msi-geforce-gtx-1060-oder-sapphire-radeon-rx-480/2/#diagramm-performancerating-1920-1080

More interesting, however, is power consumption improvements (same source, total system power consumption):
980 => 1060
235w => 188w, new gen consumes 80% of the prev gen

390 => 480
364w => 232w, new gen consumes 64% of the prv gen

nVidia is still quite ahead in perf/watt, but gap is smaller.
Posted on Reply
#55
64K
medi01Yay, how surprising, isn't it? News at 10!

Oh wait, we do have comparably priced products, 980 vs 1070, 980Ti vs 1080.
But let's compare 1070 vs 970 and 1080 vs 980, to get bogus higher "improvement" numbers, shall we.
That won't fly. When comparing generations you compare improvement over the last generation to see what the new generation offers. Nvidia is fairly predictable for a while now. They offer introductory, mid range and high end GPUs. The 980 Ti is a high end Maxwell and the 1080 is an upper mid range Pascal GPU but it's not in the same league as the current Flagship GPU Titan X.

When/if Nvidia releases a 1080 Ti then compare that to the 980 Ti to see what improvement Pascal offers. Prices don't determine where a GPU falls within Nvidia's stack.
Posted on Reply
#56
medi01
64KPrices don't determine where a GPU falls within Nvidia's stack.
Customer couldn't care less, where something falls at some headquarters, 450 Euro card is irrelevant for buyers of 300 Euro cards.
Posted on Reply
#57
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
medi01Customer couldn't care less, where something falls at some headquarters, 450 Euro card is irrelevant for buyers of 300 Euro cards.
It doesn't frickin matter whether consumers buy at a price tier. It doesn't change the FACTS of what model replaces what model. Like numbers are intended as direct replacement for the same number series in the previous generation. NVIDIA has been very clear about this for at least the last 6 years! Have you been sleeping in a world of sugar plums and delusions? :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 25th, 2024 16:11 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts