Monday, January 2nd 2017

Ominous ve.ga Website Surfaces with a Word Cloud

An ominously named website ve.ga surfaced on the web, pointing to the placeholder of a website AMD dedicated to its upcoming "Vega" GPU architecture. This placeholder has a word-cloud (or tag cloud), which is a 3D spacial clump of keywords/tags sorted by popularity. The words in this word-cloud could spell out key features of the "Vega" architecture, which AMD is expected to unveil later this week.
Here's what we make of these keywords:

  • 8x Capacity/stack: This probably refers to the fact that HBM2 memory has 8 times the capacity per DRAM stack, as the first-generation HBM. While HBM1 maxed out at 4 GB over a 4096-bit interface (1 GB per stack), on the Radeon R9 Fury series; HBM2 allows you to cram up to 32 GB of memory (or 8 GB per stack), over a 4096-bit interface. This also means that whatever Vega-based AMD is going to launch, will come with HBM2 memory.
  • 2x Bandwidth Per Pin: Refers to the increase in bandwidth per pin of HBM2. With a memory clock of 500 MHz, 4096-bit HBM2 could reach 1 TB/s. This gives AMD the cost-saving flexibility of deploying a 2048-bit memory bus with 8 GB of memory, and yet ending up with 512 GB/s bandwidth (more than that of the TITAN X Pascal).
  • High Bandwidth Cache: This is a very curious phrase. Perhaps it means that AMD managed to increase the data throughput of the GPU's on-die caches, or, given the way this is worded, it could be a larger cache faster than the video-memory, which the GPU can use as a large scratchpad. The fact that another keyword in this cloud refers to a "high-bandwidth cache controller" adds weight to this theory.
  • 512 TB Virtual Address Space: This adds even more weight to the theory that the HBM2 video memory, and the on-die L2 cache may not be the only physical memory on "Vega" graphics cards. The GPU probably needs a vast address space of up to 512 TB, to juggle data between the VRAM, caches, and the host.
  • 4x Power Efficiency: This is probably just a 4x performance/Watt increase over the "Fiji" silicon, and shouldn't come as a surprise, given the new 14 nm process, and the energy-efficiency improvements AMD already made with "Polaris."
  • Next Generation Compute[r] Engine: This probably refers to an upgraded compute unit (CU) design, which is at the heart of the 4x performance/Watt increases
  • Primitive Shaders: If this is what we think it is, it's big. Most modern shader operations can be simplified into smaller, simpler operations.
Source: 3DCenter.org
Add your own comment

43 Comments on Ominous ve.ga Website Surfaces with a Word Cloud

#26
BiggieShady
Draw Stream Binning Rasterizer ... fancy name for a tiled renderer, this should bring AMD back to competitive efficiency.
Posted on Reply
#27
Ferrum Master
The article clearly is misleading about the cache controller...

It is the same nvme hybrid feature as in firepro cards imho.
Posted on Reply
#28
laszlo
considering they promote it as part of "rebellion" prices will be affordable i guess; 500 $ ?
Posted on Reply
#29
R-T-B
azdesignThe whole video in ve.ga is a cringe train lol.
I have to admit, it pretty much is one of the worst commercials I have ever seen for a tech product.

Disclaimer: I'm sure there is worse, I just haven't seen one personally.
Posted on Reply
#30
Tsukiyomi91
the whole video is a cringe train. "Make some noise"... really? Hopefully it doesn't apply to their rather noisy coolers lel.
Posted on Reply
#31
springs113
According to numerous tech folks that went to the new horizons event. That Vega demo was of little Vega running on unoptimized fury drivers for said card. I am willing to believe them...and i don't know if anyone has noticed but in that video there was an "attack" on volta there. I'm pretty certain that this Vega arch means business. We all need AMD to get this right, I refuse to buy another mid tier Nvidia gpu priced at an enthusiast level pricing.
Posted on Reply
#32
Nosada
R-T-BDisclaimer: I'm sure there is worse, I just haven't seen one personally.

On topic: horrible advertising, BUT ... at least they are advertising this time. Always remember: bad press is better than no press. And them throwing the gauntlet not at nVidia's current gen, but its next gen GPU is quite ballsy, although unlikely to pan out.

I like how AMD is playing this, they are drawing attention and playing out their underdog role pretty well. Nothing but pure benchmarks and price/performance ratios will convince me, but this will help their position with the uncouth masses.

EDIT: So bored at work ...

Posted on Reply
#34
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
Dj-ElectriCPeople who get too hyped need to remind themselves that only a short while ago AMD preferred using TITAN X to showcase CPU gaming performance.

They didn't even use their own Vega early samples
Why not? It allows you to take GPU-CPU coordination out of the running as an issue. It focuses things just on the CPU's performance, and eliminates anyone being able to say Ryzen only performed well because it was paired with an AMD GPU.

@Xzibit by "first dibs" on HBM 2, what that means is they get first pick at HBM 2 production chips.
Posted on Reply
#35
kruk
swirl09This really feels like deja vu. AMD about to launch their next big architecture equipped with HBM and Nvidia drops an on paper less impressive card (Ti) that is simply better (for gaming).
There is simply no way in the world you could know that.
swirl09The specs on this thing do look great. But if the teasers were AMD showcasing their top tier model and it only beats a 1080 in Doom running Vulkan, that doesnt inspire confidence.
There isn't just one Vega, but there are Vega 10 and 11. Just wait for the benchmarks.
Posted on Reply
#36
Xzibit
ADHDGAMINGhe is referring to Consumer grade ...
There is nothing stopping Nvidia from applying HBM2 to consumer grade GeForce series besides profit margins.
rtwjunkie@Xzibit by "first dibs" on HBM 2, what that means is they get first pick at HBM 2 production chips.
HBM2 has been in production for a while. In that sense AMD has been stockpiling them because Nvidia products were released half a year ago. All 3 variants have been on the market long enough they are 40% cheaper now.
Posted on Reply
#37
Steevo
XzibitNo, Nvidia was first with HBM 2.0 both in HPC and in server market.
"The Tesla P100 is in volume production today and will ship “soon." Jen-Hsun Huang said that really means it will show up in the cloud first, and ship via OEMs in Q1 2017. "

Where is it? I tried Lenovo and a few other places to "buy" them, but there is no option for it... so......
Posted on Reply
#38
TheGuruStud
Steevo"The Tesla P100 is in volume production today and will ship “soon." Jen-Hsun Huang said that really means it will show up in the cloud first, and ship via OEMs in Q1 2017. "

Where is it? I tried Lenovo and a few other places to "buy" them, but there is no option for it... so......
I made fun of that clown when he said it. I bet they shipped the volume of 100 lol. How could they have volume when HBM2 was still in risk production (not to mention their own terrible yields, no doubt).

They sold a few for HPC and that's it, I'm assuming. I sure haven't seen anyone bragging about a farm. There's been zero talk of public release that I've seen.
Posted on Reply
#39
Xzibit
Steevo"The Tesla P100 is in volume production today and will ship “soon." Jen-Hsun Huang said that really means it will show up in the cloud first, and ship via OEMs in Q1 2017. "

Where is it? I tried Lenovo and a few other places to "buy" them, but there is no option for it... so......
Right here

NVIDIA 900-2H400-0003-000 Tesla P100 12GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $4,599.00

Supermicro GPU-NVTP100-16 Tesla P100 16GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $6,259.99

NVIDIA 900-2H400-0000-000 Tesla P100 16GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $5,599.00

Supermicro GPU-NVTP100-SXM Tesla P100 16GB SXM2 16GB CoWoS HBM2, NVLink - $7,999.99


NVIDIA 900-2H403-0000-000 Tesla P100 16GB SXM2 16GB CoWoS HBM2, NVLink - $6,999.00

If you want bulk try the Nvidia program
Posted on Reply
#40
Steevo
XzibitRight here

NVIDIA 900-2H400-0003-000 Tesla P100 12GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $4,599.00

Supermicro GPU-NVTP100-16 Tesla P100 16GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $6,259.99

NVIDIA 900-2H400-0000-000 Tesla P100 16GB CoWoS HBM2 PCIe 3.0 -- Passive Cooling - $5,599.00

Supermicro GPU-NVTP100-SXM Tesla P100 16GB SXM2 16GB CoWoS HBM2, NVLink - $7,999.99


NVIDIA 900-2H403-0000-000 Tesla P100 16GB SXM2 16GB CoWoS HBM2, NVLink - $6,999.00

If you want bulk try the Nvidia program
"Pre-Order" "Call for Availability"

Pre-Order is in stock at call for availability now today sometime in the future.....
Posted on Reply
#41
Fluffmeister
Well the cards are out and are being played with already.

Point is the HBM2 exclusivity is bollocks and equally a low yield/high return strategy makes sense however you want to slice it.
Posted on Reply
#42
TheGuruStud
Steevo"Pre-Order" "Call for Availability"

Pre-Order is in stock at call for availability now today sometime in the future.....
Built to order, I guess :roll:
Posted on Reply
#43
Steevo
FluffmeisterWell the cards are out and are being played with already.

Point is the HBM2 exclusivity is bollocks and equally a low yield/high return strategy makes sense however you want to slice it.
Interesting that IBM is using in Power PC 8 systems, everyone runs those for line of business and data mining, makes sense that a large parallel workload would utilize them and perhaps custom code to run on them, but at the rate technology is growing how long before it could design its own successor.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 22:52 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts