Monday, March 13th 2017

Vega Shows Up Beating a GTX 1080 in CompuBench, But Hold the Hypetrain

The Vega based line of AMD GPUs are definitely a big unknown at this point, so any sightings or benchmarks of it are highly sought after by the rumormill. Well, here is another one to add to your pile of rumor-material folks: AMD has posted a card benchmark to Compubench that bests even the GTX 1080.

Why hold the hype?

There are two obvious issues. One, this is a compute only benchmark, and has little relevance to the average gamer. Two, in the same benchmark, a 980TI also beats the 1080. Stranger yet, the 1080 is also beaten by its little brother, the 1070. Take this one with a grain of salt, for the obvious reasons. It won't stop the the hypetrain from using this info to its own end, but maybe you can avoid being smashed by it by using some critical thinking.
PS: If you don't like me telling you how to think, please note this was properly marked as an editorial. You may board the train of your choosing at the next exit. Good luck on reaching your destination.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

63 Comments on Vega Shows Up Beating a GTX 1080 in CompuBench, But Hold the Hypetrain

#51
X4K4
much love for the PS XD
Posted on Reply
#52
efikkan
R-T-BWhy hold the hype?
Some modesty and realism would be great for once.
FordGT90ConceptVega presumably has 8 or 16 GiB.
It has two stacks totalling 8 GB.
Posted on Reply
#53
jaggerwild
Im on the train, its rolling!!! LOOK OUT NIVIDIA!!!!!! :roll::roll::roll:
Posted on Reply
#54
owen10578
efikkanSome modesty and realism would be great for once.


It has two stacks totalling 8 GB.
On the news about liquidsky I recall they said that they can hard split Vega GPU resources for the users and there would be 4 users per GPU getting 4GB of VRAM each so most likely it means Vega or at least the commercially sold Vega has 16GB of VRAM.
Posted on Reply
#55
Hayder_Master
After lies in bulldozer - ryzen and fury x, i can't trust in AMD news anymore
Posted on Reply
#56
owen10578
Hayder_MasterAfter lies in bulldozer - ryzen and fury x, i can't trust in AMD news anymore
When did AMD lie about Ryzen?
Posted on Reply
#57
efikkan
owen10578On the news about liquidsky I recall they said that they can hard split Vega GPU resources for the users and there would be 4 users per GPU getting 4GB of VRAM each so most likely it means Vega or at least the commercially sold Vega has 16GB of VRAM.
Vega 10 will launch with two stacks of 4GB totalling 8 GB. Larger stacks might be possible down the road.
Posted on Reply
#58
medi01
DippyskoodlezThis is great if you don't take into account actual clockspeed
No, it is simply great.

owen10578When did AMD lie about Ryzen?
Much faster than 480:



Oh wait, it was someone else.
Posted on Reply
#59
Caring1
What scale are they using in that graph to compare the 1060 and the 480?
And what do they class as "performance"?
Posted on Reply
#60
Dippyskoodlez
medi01No, it is simply great.





Much faster than 480:



Oh wait, it was someone else.
Lmk when you have something other than arbitrary charts and graphs to prove your point.


Meanwhile, im going to continue enjoying >and amd combo performance that ive had for two years now. Welcome to 2015, amd.
Posted on Reply
#61
medi01
Dippyskoodlez...<I kinda feel kinda a bit offended since you posted things that don't kinda align with my kinda AMD hating kinda opinion.
So let me declare computerbase's summary an "arbitrary chart">...
It is fine, (although, lowish and stupid) to hate AMD, don't worry.
Posted on Reply
#62
Dippyskoodlez
medi01It is fine, (although, lowish and stupid) to hate AMD, don't worry.
I dont hate amd, i'm just not willing to make excuses for mediocre products and abusing a hype machine. I want a better product from them and know they can make one. I used to run amd almost exclusively because they actually had the better product a long time ago. I have a substantial history of amd support. Probably longer than a lot of people have been into computers at all around here. I have an old athlon xp 1700+ on my keychain for about 13 years. I have a pile of AMD cpus sitting in my closet.

Zen is flat out not what it needed to be. It is not ready to endure the same lifespan of abuse that the fx line did, and amd intends to cycle it through the same way.

Btw, here's a brief history of cpus ive owned:
K6-II
Thunderbird 1300
Axp 1700+
Axp 2500+
A64 (4 different speeds)
A64 II
Sempron (a64 based)
Phenom II
Fx 8350

P4 wilamette
2500k
3570k
5820k
4x xeon e5-2640
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 23rd, 2024 05:49 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts