Wednesday, June 21st 2017
Raijintek Intros the Juno X Low-profile CPU Cooler
Raijintek today introduced the Juno X top-flow CPU cooler. A throwback to the heatsink-designs of the early-2000s, the Juno X features an aluminium fin-stack that has been bunched up in the middle to make the base, with the ends of the fins projecting radially; and two 6 mm-thick nickel-plated copper heat pipes fast-tracking heat transfer from the base to the peripheries of the fins. The cooler comes in four variants based on the color of its fan's LED illumination, red, green, and blue, and no-illumination.
The factory-fitted 92 mm fan takes in 4-pin PWM power input, and spins between 1,200-2,500 RPM, pushing up to 52 CFM of air, with a noise output of 26 dBA. Measuring 110 mm x 110 mm x 50 mm (LxWxH), the cooler weighs about 130 g, and can handle thermal loads of up to 70W TDP. The cooler supports most modern CPU sockets, including AM4, AM3(+), FM2(+), LGA115x, and LGA775.
The factory-fitted 92 mm fan takes in 4-pin PWM power input, and spins between 1,200-2,500 RPM, pushing up to 52 CFM of air, with a noise output of 26 dBA. Measuring 110 mm x 110 mm x 50 mm (LxWxH), the cooler weighs about 130 g, and can handle thermal loads of up to 70W TDP. The cooler supports most modern CPU sockets, including AM4, AM3(+), FM2(+), LGA115x, and LGA775.
11 Comments on Raijintek Intros the Juno X Low-profile CPU Cooler
I had one of these cooper zalman, it was a little wonder back then, still own a cpns 9500 zalamn too...
And just a few months ago I gave away a "conjoined-twin" relative - TT DuOrb, so my friend can cool his old Radeon x1900.
As far as I remember - all of those were crap.
Also, I don't like this:Because my HTPC-200 weighs twice as much without fan, and it can handle 65W AMD APUs just fine, but with 90W rated TDP it was struggling with a 65W i5-2500(non-K).
CNPS7000 weighs x6 times as much at nearly the same dimensions and structure, and was rated at ~80W max dissipation, given that it's made completely out of copper.
It wants its cooler back
Performance is not so good:
www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/threads/412974-Akasa-AK-CC1101EP02-Xigmatek-Praeton-LD963
What I had in mind looked like this:
Or this:
A more accurate description would be:
well ... no innovation there i guess:kookoo: