Wednesday, July 5th 2017

AMD Reportedly Rebranding RX 460 to RX 560D

In a bid to better make use of what could be a respectable stock of RX 460 graphics cards, AMD is reportedly rebranding these to the RX 500 series under the RX 560D name. Apparently, this is a straight rebrand, with no increased clocks or other revisions to the GPU die whatsoever. As such, this RX 560D would bring a lesser performance level than the current RX 560 already offers. Remember that the RX 560 is currently a rebrand of the RX 460 already, only with that card's full stream processor count (1,024) unlocked, whereas the original RX 460 only enabled 896 of the total 1,024 stream processors available on-die.

AMD already toyed with this additional "D" in the nomenclature in the past, with its RX 470 / RX 470D graphics cards, of which we've heard some rumblings lately. Considering that the RX 470D was a relatively limited release, only really being seen in the wild towards the Asian market, it is likely a safe bet that this RX 560D will follow the same path. Another option for the unwary miners to pick up?
Source: Videocardz
Add your own comment

31 Comments on AMD Reportedly Rebranding RX 460 to RX 560D

#26
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Seriously, if they are going to rebrand it, why not just lower the number by 5? Call it the RX 555 instead of the RX 560D. So people don't get confused thinking they are buying a RX 560. I mean, why are both sides so scared to use that last digit in the model number?
Posted on Reply
#27
medi01
Prima.VeraYou're comparing apples with melons again. We are talking about the same brand selling a same product under a new series which is , by nomenclature, newer and theoretically better than the old one.
Something unseenin GPU industry.
Posted on Reply
#28
Fluffmeister
CaelestisIf AMD does something like that, it is called "rebrand". If nvidia does it, it is always called "refresh". Wonder why.................o_O
As medi01 has pointed out, Nv are called out all the time.

So should AMD with their shitty Rebrandeons
Posted on Reply
#29
Caelestis
FluffmeisterAs medi01 has pointed out, Nv are called out all the time.

So should AMD with their shitty Rebrandeons
From a marketing standpoint - having a consistent naming convention - I could understand it ........... if the 560 would not already exist. But, like newtekie1 already said, this will be just confusing for the common PC user.
Posted on Reply
#30
medi01
newtekie1Seriously, if they are going to rebrand it, why not just lower the number by 5? Call it the RX 555 instead of the RX 560D. So people don't get confused thinking they are buying a RX 560. I mean, why are both sides so scared to use that last digit in the model number?
470D (which was slower than 470) says "hi".

It is quite in line with previous D naming.
Posted on Reply
#31
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
medi01470D (which was slower than 470) says "hi".

It is quite in line with previous D naming.
Yes, my argument applies just as equally to the 470D. In fact, I believe I made it back when that first came out too.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 18th, 2025 06:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts