Wednesday, August 2nd 2017

AMD Says Vega Delays Necessary to Increase Stock for Gamers

In an interview, AMD's Chris Hook justified Vega's delayed release due to a wish to increase available stock for gamers who want to purchase the new high-performance architecture by AMD. In an interview with HardOCP, Chris Hook had this to say:

"Part of the reason it's taken us a little longer to launch Vega - and I'll be honest about that - is that we wanted to make sure we were launching with good volume. (...) Obviously we've got to compensate for things like coin-miners, they're going to want to get their hands on these. We believe we're launching with a volume that will ensure that gamers can get their hands on them, and that's what's important to us."

It appears that AMD tried their best to increase production and stock volumes so as to mitigate price fluctuations upon Vega's entry to the market due to above normal demand from cryptocurrency miners. The jury is still out on whether Vega will be an option for mining due to its exquisite architecture, however. Still, this sounds as good a reason as any to delay Vega for as long as it has been already. Just a few more days until we see what AMD managed with this one, folks. Check the video after the break.

Source: HardOCP YouTube Channel
Add your own comment

105 Comments on AMD Says Vega Delays Necessary to Increase Stock for Gamers

#101
Hood
Th3pwn3rYou can tell he doesn't know about consoles and how AMD is involved with them.
My first gaming experience was on a console, playing Pong on a Sears Atari system in the early '70s. Yes, AMD has the hardware contracts for some consoles - too bad console gaming is on the way out. In 2016, PC gaming revenues surpassed all others (mobile, console, arcade). Consoles suck, they're for kids who can't afford even a basic gaming PC. They can't save anything, those contracts will be a minor bargaining point during the acquisition talks.
Posted on Reply
#102
efikkan
RejZoRThen what does? Pushing the limits is what drives the innovation. If everyone played it safe we'd still be stuck on SDR memory with everything. Or DDR1 at best.

Saying HBM doesn't matter because it doesn't have any significant benefits.
Please try again.
You totally missed the point. It's fine to switch to a technology which provides significant benefits for the product, but the problem is that HBM currently doesn't. Any rational person would jump on the new technology when it's mature and beneficial.
Posted on Reply
#103
bug
RejZoRSeems like these days, TPU is filled with hardcore NVIDIOTS, who will refuse to accept facts and call anyone who presents them an "AMD fanboy"...
Hey, we're not the ones calling a questionable product "revolutionary" just because it comes from a company we root for. And we're not calling you names.
Just some food for thought.
Posted on Reply
#104
Prima.Vera
EarthDogLol, rejz...

Its great they can fit 16gb... considering 6-8gb is fine for those that 4k... its anotber reason its well ahead of its time and doesnt show many benefits today.

Though, im sure youll gloss over that point of mine as well...
gb or GB? 1GB=8gb ... bits, bytes,...
Posted on Reply
#105
EarthDog
Clearly GB... typing on my phone. ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 23rd, 2024 08:50 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts