Friday, August 11th 2017

AMD Asks Reviewers to Prioritize Vega 56 over Vega 64

It seems that AMD's RX Vega lineup won't be too far away from the norm, it seems. Street knowledge almost always says that it's the runner-up to the highest performing graphics card that is the more interesting in a price-performance ratio, and it seems that AMD knows this as well. Steve Burke from Gamer's Nexus has reported on AMD's NDA dates and the company's indications to reviewers on changing up the game leading up to reviews: they're asking that publications focus on the Vega 56 ahead of the halo Vega 64.

This might be somewhat bad news for those who wanted to see the Vega 64 compete in favorable terms with the GTX 1080; this decision by AMD is obviously geared towards making the best impact on the company's product line and image. The fact that AMD can offer a more compelling argument over the Vega 64 means that Vega 56 will probably have an easier battle in the $400 camp (if you can find it at those prices on launch, that is.)
Gamer's Nexus have offered a schedule of sorts for AMD's Vega NDA dates, which are:
  • Unboxing embargo lift on Saturday, August 12, 11AM EDT: AMD permits unboxing photos or videos only.
  • Performance embargo lift for Vega 56 on August 14, 9AM EDT.
  • RX Vega 64 already in hands of some reviewers, with unboxing embargo lift on Saturday, August 12, 11AM EDT.
  • RX Vega 64 performance embargo lift on August 14, 9AM EDT.
  • Update: Vega 56 launches on 8/28.
Source: Gamer's Nexus
Add your own comment

34 Comments on AMD Asks Reviewers to Prioritize Vega 56 over Vega 64

#26
dyonoctis
efikkanI'm surprised we haven't heard more about Vega11 at this point. There is a huge gap between GTX 1060 and GTX 1070, and AMD should be rushing to fill that hole.
Looking at the current state of the market they would only be able to fill that gap for a week or two, then the greed will kick in, and vega 11 would be another overpriced gpu, because AMD don't think that dedicated mining gpu are a good thing.

markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/nvidia-stock-price-and-amd-have-very-different-views-on-crytocurrencies-2017-8-1002252838

All the mining amd gpu that were "launched " were made by third party. But I've never seen a single one in any store, same for the dedicated mining GPU that Nvidia actually made, you won't find them in any store. Apparently the resselers don't like the idea of not inflating gpu price, and don't want to order mining gpu.

It's an issue for both camp because the mining hardware make by nvidia was though for it from the ground up : optimized for mining application, and lower energy comsumption. By making them so much better than their gaming counter part, it would have helped to avoid this chaos.
Posted on Reply
#27
efikkan
dyonoctisLooking at the current state of the market they would only be able to fill that gap for a week or two, then the greed will kick in, and vega 11 would be another overpriced gpu, because AMD don't think that dedicated mining gpu are a good thing…
The mining fad is not going to last. Both Pascal and Polaris have been short supply for several periods before the Ethereum mania. The profitability of mining is decreasing with every GPU bought for mining, and if Vega are better at mining that's just going to accelerate the process.
Posted on Reply
#28
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
yotano211I already found a local supplier that can supply me with 8 on launch day or pre-order day.
I am going to be out of town or would be in the same boat as you. 2 per brand across 5 release day available brands.
Posted on Reply
#29
Jism
dyonoctisLooking at the current state of the market they would only be able to fill that gap for a week or two, then the greed will kick in, and vega 11 would be another overpriced gpu, because AMD don't think that dedicated mining gpu are a good thing.

markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/nvidia-stock-price-and-amd-have-very-different-views-on-crytocurrencies-2017-8-1002252838

All the mining amd gpu that were "launched " were made by third party. But I've never seen a single one in any store, same for the dedicated mining GPU that Nvidia actually made, you won't find them in any store. Apparently the resselers don't like the idea of not inflating gpu price, and don't want to order mining gpu.

It's an issue for both camp because the mining hardware make by nvidia was though for it from the ground up : optimized for mining application, and lower energy comsumption. By making them so much better than their gaming counter part, it would have helped to avoid this chaos.
Selling cards = profit. Wether it's on the mining, gaming or professional market, AMD nor Nvidia does'nt give any damn where those cards are going, as long as sales are being done. That is what counts.
Posted on Reply
#30
yotano211
cdawallI am going to be out of town or would be in the same boat as you. 2 per brand across 5 release day available brands.
Its the same deal for me, 1 or 2 parts per brand is their limit. They didnt have limit on per 1 customer for entire purchase.
Posted on Reply
#31
Vayra86
JismSelling cards = profit. Wether it's on the mining, gaming or professional market, AMD nor Nvidia does'nt give any damn where those cards are going, as long as sales are being done. That is what counts.
They do care to a degree; this is a classic tale of short term gains that come with long term losses. For example, even just the stock price of both companies is inflated as hell and that bubble WILL burst at some point, just like it already did for AMD some time ago, and Nvidia same thing. Those wild fluctuations are signs of instability and that is never good for profit. Stable markets are the most profitable because you can scale your production according to that and have more overall control of supply and demand. This allows for efficiency across the entire chain, from production, to store shelves, stockpiles/storage, brand presence etc etc etc. Miners effectively destroy that efficiency.

But if all else fails, of course both companies won't hesitate to make money. But increasing production lines because of mining? That one ain't never gonna happen, because it destroys efficiency and both companies incur a greater penalty later down the line.
Posted on Reply
#32
Fierce Guppy
XazaxSo wait Vega 56 isnt releasing till end of August rather than August 14?
IT'S. JUST. AROUND. THE. CORNER!
Posted on Reply
#33
Prima.Vera
Those cards should have been released exactly 1 year ago...
Posted on Reply
#34
efikkan
Vayra86But if all else fails, of course both companies won't hesitate to make money. But increasing production lines because of mining? That one ain't never gonna happen, because it destroys efficiency and both companies incur a greater penalty later down the line.
Sure, there is a mining mania now, and it will pass, and perhaps we'll have one next year again, and so on. Still, the miners only buy a few thousand cards. The supply problem for Pascal and Polaris is larger than mining.

Starting new batches of GPUs will take ~5 months or so, if there were free production capacity. Additional production lines would have required billions of dollars in investments years ago…
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 23:20 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts