Tuesday, September 12th 2017

Intel Core i7-8700K Put Through Cinebench R15

Intel's upcoming Core i7-8700K six-core mainstream desktop processor was put through Cinebench R15, where it was seen trading blows with much higher high-end desktop (HEDT) processors, thanks to its core-count and relatively high clock speeds. Unlike HEDT processors, the i7-8700K doesn't carry a bulky uncore, keeping its TDP low at 95W, enabling high clock speeds. This reflects in its single-threaded performance, where it was significantly faster than older chips, some of which are even HEDT, but since the "Coffee Lake" architecture is essentially a refresh of the "Kaby Lake" architecture, the chip could lose out on single-threaded performance to the Core i7-7700K on account of slightly lower clock speeds.

The multi-threaded test is where the action is. Bolstered by two more cores, four more threads, and 4 MB more L3 cache, the i7-8700K is proportionately faster than the quad-core chips it succeeds, and is even faster than older 6-core HEDT chips thanks to higher clock speeds, and a newer micro-architecture. The i7-8700K features 6 cores, 12 threads enabled by HyperThreading, Intel's newest Turbo Boost Max 3.0 technology introduced with its Core X family, and 12 MB of L3 cache. It launches on the 5th of October, at an expected price of around USD $380, if not more.
A video presentation by YouTuber Karl - MrTechQc, who tested the chip, follows

Source: Karl - MrTechQc (YouTube)
Add your own comment

29 Comments on Intel Core i7-8700K Put Through Cinebench R15

#26
Vayra86
chief-gunney" this chip will OC to 4.8-5 ghz" - lol, on LN2 maybe, probably need serious water cooling to get it to 4.5 on all cores which might just be worth it.
Still, we haven't seen the price yet and in terms of price performance against AMD now, Intel has no hope of being competitive until they come up with something to rival Infinity fabric and it's yield cost.
What.. this chip is likely to OC to 4.8 on good air cooling alone, perhaps as a 4C turbo but that already makes it a super competitive CPU that sits nicely in the best of both worlds metric of good core/thread count + high clocks at a reasonable TDP. And compared to Ryzen at 4.0 on all cores, that is a serious gap of 10% or more on even the best threaded scenarios, and in single it will be over 20% faster.

Intel is still competitive on performance in many price brackets, including the bottom end as we are still waiting on a capable Ryzen APU, Intel also still has the mobile space in firm grip, in fact the only segment where they really aren't that competitive anymore is HEDT - UNLESS you are using an Intel favored workload, of which there are quite a few.

So really, bottom line, Intel hasn't lost THAT much ground here - the Ryzen 3 + 5 is very competitive with anything Intel puts out in the same price tiers, but Ryzen 7, not so much. In HEDT, funnily, the real advantage of TR starts paying dividends at the highest core counts, which is a tiny tiny sliver of the consumer market.

Ryzen's biggest issue right now is its clockspeed limitations, and ironically, these are tied closely to the infinity fabric-based design which is its biggest perk; on HEDT this is not a drawback, but for mainstream, it truly is.
Posted on Reply
#27
dwade
Most Client PC users aren't going to be running multithreaded workloads 24/7, so Intel is even faster for most people. Killer single threaded performance will always be the best building block for CPUs. Apple pretty much imitated this concept with their AX processors.
Posted on Reply
#28
[XC] Oj101
chief-gunney" this chip will OC to 4.8-5 ghz" - lol, on LN2 maybe, probably need serious water cooling to get it to 4.5 on all cores which might just be worth it.
Still, we haven't seen the price yet and in terms of price performance against AMD now, Intel has no hope of being competitive until they come up with something to rival Infinity fabric and it's yield cost.
4.8 - 5.0 GHz won't need LN2, I can assure you of that :)
Posted on Reply
#29
noname00
Why is the multiplier set to 154 and the Bus Speed set to 24?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 16th, 2025 06:15 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts