Wednesday, September 27th 2017

Mozilla Looks to Supercharge the Browsing Experience With Firefox Quantum

Mozilla is announcing that the latest version of its Firefox browser, Firefox 57, is just too good for just another numbered release. The improvements under the hood are so great, they say, and the performance improvements over previous Firefox releases are so grand, that only one name would have been enough to convey this message. That's why the latest Firefox release has been christened "Firefox Quantum".

Mozilla are saying their new Firefox Quantum browser delivers 2x the score in Speedometer as their previous Firefox 56. The new, refined browser didn't appear overnight, though; it's seen numerous improvements under the hood through the application of the Goldilocks principle to browser design, straddling an approach between increased performance and acceptable memory usage. Multi-process and optimized memory footprint are part of the secret sauce, but a new, super-charged CSS engine written in Rust goes a long way. Prioritization of the open tab also helps this increased speed, while (Mozilla says) reducing memory utilization by 30% when compared to Chrome.
During the last few moths, the Mozilla team has cleared over 468 performance bottlenecks that where floating under the radar, mining both Firefox's performance and fluidity, in what they say ranged between "small papercuts and big bottlenecks". There's a new, minimalist coat of paint over the Firefox interface, courtesy of their Photon project, which aimed t give Firefox a cleaner, less intrusive look. It also introduces square tabs, smooth animations, and a Library, which provides quick access to your saved stuff: bookmarks, Pocket, history, downloads, tabs, and screenshots.


Mozilla has uploaded a video comparing the two most popular browsers - their own, brand new Firefox Quantum and Chrome in a face-off. Of course, there's likely some preferred web-pages over there.


The new Firefox Quantum will be available for download on November 14th. However, if you're up to being a pioneer, you can download a beta of it today, straight from Mozilla. Naturally, it being a Beta means there are some rough edges - particularly with extension support. Don't take my word for it, but so far I'm impressed by what Mozilla has done with the Firefox Quantum release. Even in beta, the improvements to site loading and responsiveness are obvious, and the new clean look is much more appealing for an uncluttered browsing experience. Just do be aware of the Extension support issue: half of mine are not working.
Sources: Mozilla Blogs, Mozilla Hacks CSS
Add your own comment

66 Comments on Mozilla Looks to Supercharge the Browsing Experience With Firefox Quantum

#51
bug
FierceRedDon't forget bug, only those who use NoScript experience browser performance in the purest software way possible.

Nowadays whenever I use the Internet on a browser without NoScript, I have geocities-like reactions of disgust and always ask the device owner how they can possibly live that way.
On top of that, Firefox 57 not only obsoletes NoScript, it obsoletes LightBeam as well :(
And while heavy scripting might be tolerable on the desktop, it's an absolute murder on mobile. Especially when you (need to) get the desktop version of a page.
Posted on Reply
#52
plåtburken
CheapMeatUh, I already do? I do content creation, music videos mainly. I also often have a ton of Chrome tabs open. I'm not experiencing issues. I think you're just another person who exaggerates with hyperbole or has a really low end system.


Extension wise, just running HTTPS Everywhere and uBlock Origin.
No you don't, if you did you would understand that having applications hogging memory and starving others will result into huge performance loss and issues of stability.
Posted on Reply
#53
trparky
The issue isn't the fact that it uses a lot of RAM, the issue is that as it consumes all that RAM it slows down considerably. I don't know what's going on inside the browser to cause this to happen but it is indeed happening. It's like it's choking on the memory load.
Posted on Reply
#54
bug
trparkyThe issue isn't the fact that it uses a lot of RAM, the issue is that as it consumes all that RAM it slows down considerably. I don't know what's going on inside the browser to cause this to happen but it is indeed happening. It's like it's choking on the memory load.
It must be some usage pattern at work, cause I keep Firefox open 8 hours a day at work, together with Chromium, Vivaldi, an IDE and during the first half of the day usually the swap isn't used at all (I keep it showing in the tray).
Posted on Reply
#55
trparky
Do you use Javascript intense web sites? I do.

I have one web site that can make a single Firefox sub-process start chowing down on 800 MBs of RAM in a few hours. It's a news reading web site where I have all of my RSS feeds brought together for easy reading. The site is awesome, it does a lot of things, the only bad thing is that it makes your browser choke.
Posted on Reply
#56
bug
trparkyDo you use Javascript intense web sites? I do.

I have one web site that can make a single Firefox sub-process start chowing down on 800 MBs of RAM in a few hours. It's a news reading web site where I have all of my RSS feeds brought together for easy reading. The site is awesome, it does a lot of things, the only bad thing is that it makes your browser choke.
Idk, I use NoScript. That, by default runs scripts only from the host you're visiting. On top of that, you need to add some CDNs, jquery and a handful of other common sites and you're good to go.
As said before, if JS is really the culprit here, you should be able to fix your problem with a page refresh. Unless there's something really fishy going on that causes the JS engine to never free used memory.
Posted on Reply
#57
trparky
Probably more than likely the site itself has leaky JS code.
Posted on Reply
#58
bug
trparkyProbably more than likely the site itself has leaky JS code.
Probably ... more than likely. Good one ;)

Unless you're talking about JS that somehow trips Firefox's engine (easily proven if other browsers are fine with the same website), I fail to see how you can fault the browser here.
Posted on Reply
#59
trparky
NewsBlur and Facebook are two main culprit sites for me which causes Firefox to pig out on RAM. But what I don't get is why Firefox slows down simply because of RAM usage. What's really going on inside of it? You'd think that it wouldn't matter how much RAM it's using, having data in RAM shouldn't matter.
Posted on Reply
#60
bug
trparkyNewsBlur and Facebook are two main culprit sites for me which causes Firefox to pig out on RAM. But what I don't get is why Firefox slows down simply because of RAM usage. What's really going on inside of it? You'd think that it wouldn't matter how much RAM it's using, having data in RAM shouldn't matter.
It runs all JS on a single thread, that's why.
Posted on Reply
#61
xorbe
All I'm saying bug is that it was a serious problem at the time semi-recently, and now it seems fine with nightly. Not sure why you are so defensive of some software, sort of an inexperienced viewpoint when it comes to software and the variety of issues and configurations.
Posted on Reply
#62
bug
xorbeAll I'm saying bug is that it was a serious problem at the time semi-recently, and now it seems fine with nightly. Not sure why you are so defensive of some software, sort of an inexperienced viewpoint when it comes to software and the variety of issues and configurations.
I'm defensive because you seem to blame this on Firefox without telling us if and how you looked for the root cause. And I'm saying Firefox is not actually unusable past a few hours, because I keep it open all day every day and performance is just fine. Whatever problems you see, are not a given, but some unfortunate alignment of God know what conditions.
Posted on Reply
#63
xorbe
Hey, there's a guy over on reddit who says his Firefox is crashing. You should head over there and let him know that your Firefox isn't crashing.
Posted on Reply
#64
Valentino77
I wouldn't use strong terms like "supercharge", but Quantum does look interesting. it's miles above what Google'ss been doing recently. yet it's still a bit slower when tested by overclockers and nerds like me. But the potential of Quantum is way above what Google can offer today. Not to mention Apple with its High Sierra and Safari 11.
Posted on Reply
#65
bug
Valentino77I wouldn't use strong terms like "supercharge", but Quantum does look interesting. it's miles above what Google'ss been doing recently. yet it's still a bit slower when tested by overclockers and nerds like me. But the potential of Quantum is way above what Google can offer today. Not to mention Apple with its High Sierra and Safari 11.
Keep in mind that arguably the most important piece of the Quantum project, WebRender, will only land in Firefox 59. That's a new compositor, supposedly built to offload as much as possible to the GPU.
Posted on Reply
#66
jboydgolfer
I like the idea of the "multi process" option. Ive maxed it to 7, to monitor the impact on performance as well as my Hardware.

Unfortunately I have noticed small freezes during multi tab use, I don't know if it's something specific though
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 01:25 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts