Tuesday, December 5th 2017
ASUS' Custom RX Vega Product Pages Surface After 4 Months - Details Still Scant
Four months of silence after what can only be classified as a premature announcement, ASUS has finally put up the product pages for their custom RX Vega 56 and 64 graphics cards, marketed under the Strix branding. Yield and packaging issues, as well as differing chip characteristics between different AMD packaging partners, have greatly affected TTM on RX Vega's custom designs, which were sorely needed so as to improve on some of the reference cards' shortcomings. Sadly, the product pages are just that - product pages - and lack the holy trinity of graphics cards important information - clock speeds, pricing, and availability.Tech specs are in the same ballpark as ASUS' other Strix offerings: there's ASUS' Aura Sync RGB LED support for aesthetics, a 2.5" cooler which ASUS boasts of enabling a 40% increase in dissipation area - bringing about a 30% increase in cooling capabilities and an up to 300% reduction in operating noise. ASUS' MaxContact technology is being marketed as leveraging the best precision machining tools in the industry, increasing evenness of the copper contact plate and therefore increasing contact area for improved heat transfer - by up to 2x as much. The power delivery is being quoted as 12+1 design, which should ensure Vega's typical power hunger should be fully fed. The dual fans are also IP5X certified when it comes to dust resistance, for improved reliability and lifespan.
Sources:
ASUS RX 64, ASUS RX 56, via Tom's HArdware
18 Comments on ASUS' Custom RX Vega Product Pages Surface After 4 Months - Details Still Scant
You can see the bad photoshop since the GPU die goes through the blue line xD
What a frikin' mess of a product launch.
You are misjudging AF.
EDIT: The plate in blue is rising 1 mm over the base plate with screws, hence the different reflection.
What is with you guys and the fake news written lately, mostly very old news recycled and packaged as brand new info or worse?!
You guys wrote:
1. that Intel's Core-S has more PCI lanes than Ryzen,
2. That AM4, after a year, finally has some CPUs that make us of it's video out ports,
3. that you just found out that AMD is using AM4 until 2020,
4. that Raven Ridge is discovered to have mXFR,
5. that Vega Mobile made a sudden, unexpected turn and dropped HBM2 in favor of DDR4.
and the list is endless.
The 1070Ti was available from 3rd party brands on the first day of release.
Company culture... hard to change.
The supply issue is simply a different beast: buying production capacity is too expensive for such a low-volume product. Because even ifVega would sell like hotcakes, in the larger scale of things its just a sliver of the market.
Its a simple business case, its about money, thus about margin on the product itself, which is too low, which is a consequence of it performing below expectations, which in turn makes it retarded for AMD to invest in producing it in the current marketplace. They've had more than enough time to crank out a large quantity of product by now and this is also the reason the AIBs are not keen on it. They need to put a team on a product that will never sell reliably. Remember: it was smoke and mirrors around Vega from the day it was announced, until after its release, with the weird pricing structure that actually didn't count for anyone as a shining example. Alright. Let's see if the 'Apple problem' (just another example of smoke and mirrors, the Apple deal didn't fall out of the sky yesterday and can be planned for) ever goes away then. Because around time of release there was no such Apple problem, it was an 'HBM2 supply problem' because apparently, these chips really do grow in tiny quantities on Mt Everest. I also heard that AMD had every intention of delaying its release because they had to get their production in order. Boy, this is getting weirder by the minute, isn't it?
You'll understand my skepticism :)