Wednesday, March 7th 2018

Intel "Hades Canyon" NUC Armed with Vega M Plays Anything at 1080p

Intel's upcoming "Hades Canyon" NUC, the spiritual successor to the company's "Skull Canyon" NUC; will be one of the first commercial implementations of the "Kaby Lake-G" multi-chip module, which puts an AMD Radeon Vega M graphics part and a quad-core "Kaby Lake" die together on a package, along with 4 GB of HBM2 memory for the GPU, when they start shipping in Spring 2018, priced between $799-$999. Korean tech publication Playwares got its hands on one of these, and its testing suggests that it achieves the key design goal of Kaby Lake-G: to be able to play any of today's games at 1080p (with acceptable levels of eye-candy.)

Playwares put "Hades Canyon" through three of today's AAA game titles that take advantage of DirectX 12: "Rise of the Tomb Raider," "Tom Clancy's The Division," and "Total War: Warhammer 2." At default clocks, and 1080p resolution, "Rise of the Tomb Raider" puts out around 53 fps, with 45.36 fps (minimum, 99th percentile). When overclocked, the chip averages 59.11 fps, with 50.5 fps (minimum, 99th percentile). "The Division" averages 41.5 fps at default clocks, and 46.8 fps when overclocked. "Warhammer 2" is a lot more taxing on the chip - 27.3 fps average and 23 fps minimum at default clocks, and 30.1 average with 26 fps minimum, when overclocked. One has to take into account that the "Vega M" chip on the Core i7-8709G is significantly more powerful than the iGPU of AMD's Ryzen "Raven Ridge" APUs - 1536 stream processors, 96 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 1024-bit HBM2 memory; versus 704 stream processors, 44 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and system memory share.
Sources: Playwares, Hothardware
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Intel "Hades Canyon" NUC Armed with Vega M Plays Anything at 1080p

#26
Relayer
bugOne step at a time. They don't have the resources to fight on all fronts at the same time.
While they theoretically could make it on their own, they are using Intel's money for all the design/engineering. If it's a flop commercially they lose nothing. They still gain the experience though. And this is a step towards the endgame. A SOC with CPU/GPU/Memory all stacked on one 3D design (eventually).
Posted on Reply
#27
pjl321
dj-electricThis is truly a marvel of engineering. This much CPU+GPU horsepower to footprint ratio was science fiction not too long ago.
Good job Intel and AMD on this coop
It is very impressive but don't forget about the Xbox One X chip, that has significantly high GPU specs: 2560 vs 1536 Stream Processors, 160 vs 96 TMUs but ok no RAM.

The specs on the PS5 should really be something special, we will be in the realms of 7nm + Zen 2 + Navi + HBM3.
Posted on Reply
#28
las
That's some ultra low-end garbage
Posted on Reply
#29
pjl321
lasThat's some ultra low-end garbage
nVidia fan by any chance?

TBF, we are talking about a single chip solution that was designed to be fairly cheap plus, your 980ti is only 23% faster than this 'ultra low-end garbage'.
Posted on Reply
#30
pensuke89
pjl321nVidia fan by any chance?

TBF, we are talking about a single chip solution that was designed to be fairly cheap plus, your 980ti is only 23% faster than this 'ultra low-end garbage'.
Ok...23%.. for some reason the score seems to be more than 23%...

(scores for 980ti taken from guru3d / TPU)
The Division
GTX980Ti: 81 fps
HC NUC: 46.8 fps

TW Warhammer 2
GTX980Ti: 89 fps
HC NUC: 30.1 fps

For Honor
GTX980Ti: 106 fps
HC NUC: 59.78 fps

3DMark Firestrike
GTX980Ti: 15656
HC NUC: 11357
Posted on Reply
#31
pjl321
pensuke89Ok...23%.. for some reason the score seems to be more than 23%...

(scores for 980ti taken from guru3d / TPU)
The Division
GTX980Ti: 81 fps
HC NUC: 46.8 fps

TW Warhammer 2
GTX980Ti: 89 fps
HC NUC: 30.1 fps

For Honor
GTX980Ti: 106 fps
HC NUC: 59.78 fps

3DMark Firestrike
GTX980Ti: 15656
HC NUC: 11357
That 23% score is for the Xbox One X Vs 980ti, the Xbox's chip is more more powerful than this new Hades Canyon chip from Intel.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 4th, 2024 14:25 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts