Thursday, March 29th 2018

AMD Corrects Analyst's Cryptomining Revenue Estimate in Defense of Its Share Value

AMD has gone on to publicly call attention to what it considers to be erroneous information put forward by Susquehanna analyst Christopher Roland. The analyst's report, which prompted the reclassification of AMD and NVIDIA's share targets - and investment ratings. Looking to stem what could translate to lower confidence from investors in its share outlook for the future, AMD has now gone on to clarify that mining revenue actually accounts for single-digit amounts entering the company's coffers, and not the 20% previously mentioned by the analyst.

AMD was dealt a worse hand than NVIDIA on Cristopher Rolland's analysis, since the perceived AMD exposition to a negative downturn on the GPU cryptocurrency mining market (kickstarted by the expected entrance in the market of Ethereum-specific ASICs) was double that of NVIDIA (20% on the former versus 10% on the latter). As such, the company has tried to remind customers, investors, and would-be investors that they appreciate the time and attention that investors continue to pay to Blockchain and cryptocurrency, but "(...) we [AMD] would also like to keep it in perspective with the multiple other growth opportunities ahead for AMD." You can read the AMD statement in full after the break, under the title "The View from Our Corner of the Street".
"Yesterday a report was published on AMD which hypothesized very high revenue for Ethereum-related GPU sales. As a reminder, on our Q4'17 earnings conference call we stated that the percentage of annual revenue related to Blockchain was approximately mid-single digit percentage in 2017. We had significant growth in the GPU business outside of Blockchain in Q4'17 as we ramped our Radeon Vega products, our GPU compute products, and our Apple business. We also spoke about strength across the rest of our business with AMD Ryzen and AMD EPYC product momentum. We have very compelling long-term drivers for the company including PCs, servers and graphics and our Q1 2018 financial guidance reflects that.

We appreciate the time and attention that investors continue to pay to Blockchain and cryptocurrency, but would also like to keep it in perspective with the multiple other growth opportunities ahead for AMD."
Source: AMD News Releases
Add your own comment

32 Comments on AMD Corrects Analyst's Cryptomining Revenue Estimate in Defense of Its Share Value

#26
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
jigar2speedSeems someone one is looking ways to devalue AMD stock and finally buy AMD, no wonder their stocks have been attacked lately.
Yeah It Won't happen though
Posted on Reply
#27
cucker tarlson
It's not like AMD cards can't defend themselves on their own merits, they need a swarm of men that will downvote everything that was said here poking holes in amd's marketing,which by the way is mostly (all?) true. If you're so good with your analytic skills, why have you not still learned what the "-1" button does ? Cause it sure as hell is not an equivalent to "I disagree".
Vega was supposed to have features that it turned out not to have, and it's not just primitive shaders. If I bought Vega and found out dsbr was not working, I'm telling you honestly I would lose my shit. It was supposed to compete with 1080Ti/TXp too. Giving credibility to that whole marketing BS (poor volta?) cost me a 1080Ti upgrade,which I wanted to do in April. I was one click from buying a 1080Ti but decided to wait for the Vega, then cryptocurrency happened and buying anything was either impossible or complete lunacy.
Posted on Reply
#28
Fabio
evernessinceDo you have overall sales numbers for Vega? Didn't think so, stop with the assumptions.

Unlike Nvidia, AMD can't afford to screw over it's AIBs by selling directly. You do realize that the last company before Nvidia to try that went out of business because AIBs left them. Nvidia can do it because it has the GPU market by the balls.
which company was left by aibs?
Posted on Reply
#29
champsilva
Damage control trying to hold things up.
Posted on Reply
#30
Casecutter
Fabiowhich company was left by aibs?
Yea, who is XFX today make profit on... today?
Posted on Reply
#31
Fluffmeister
cucker tarlsonIt's not like AMD cards can't defend themselves on their own merits, they need a swarm of men that will downvote everything that was said here poking holes in amd's marketing,which by the way is mostly (all?) true. If you're so good with your analytic skills, why have you not still learned what the "-1" button does ? Cause it sure as hell is not an equivalent to "I disagree".
Vega was supposed to have features that it turned out not to have, and it's not just primitive shaders. If I bought Vega and found out dsbr was not working, I'm telling you honestly I would lose my shit. It was supposed to compete with 1080Ti/TXp too. Giving credibility to that whole marketing BS (poor volta?) cost me a 1080Ti upgrade,which I wanted to do in April. I was one click from buying a 1080Ti but decided to wait for the Vega, then cryptocurrency happened and buying anything was either impossible or complete lunacy.
Well said sir, but the cult of AMD is strong and they can do no wrong.
Posted on Reply
#32
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
The same can be said of intel too.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Oct 2nd, 2024 06:21 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts