Thursday, June 28th 2018

Prices of First-gen AMD Threadrippers Drop Like a Rock

Intel's strategy against AMD's unexpected doubling in core-counts of its Ryzen Threadripper HEDT processors has been that of a headless chicken in a room painted Vantablack. It announced a 28-core processor that would require you to buy a new motherboard; and is frantically working on a 22-core processor for the existing LGA2066 platform. It's looking like AMD isn't in a mood to walk into Intel's core-count trap, and could hit Intel where it hurts the most - pricing. The top-dog 32-core part has already reared its head on German web-stores, seeking a little over 1,500€, just 500€ more than the price its previous-generation 16-core flagship, the Threadripper 1950X launched at. At 1,500€-ish, AMD could end up disrupting Intel's entire >10-core lineup that's priced between $1199 to $1999, currently occupied by 12-core, 14-core, 16-core, and 18-core SKUs.

AMD may not spare Intel's sub-$1000 Core X lineup, either. Prices of first-generation Ryzen Threadripper processors are seeing a dramatic drop, with the flagship Threadripper 1950X being priced under 650€. Prices of the 12-core Threadripper 1920X have slipped to just under 550€. The Core i9-7900X, meanwhile, continues to command a touch over 880€. The drop in prices of first-gen Threadrippers is likely retailers trying to clear out inventories to make room for 2nd generation Threadrippers. It could also be a prelude to AMD announcing more affordable 12-core and 16-core Threadrippers based on the 2nd generation "Zen+" architecture.
Add your own comment

77 Comments on Prices of First-gen AMD Threadrippers Drop Like a Rock

#76
neko77025
I have been eyeballing A Ryzen 1700 as A upgrade to A few PCs I have running (as in dropping 3x pcs for ESXi VMs) .. but not sure if I am try to talk my self into or out of getting A 1950x .

1700
Pros
Cheaper, only 65w, all I really need to replace 3computers and only need 2 sticks of ram to get up and running

cons
Not as cool ?
-----
1950x
Pros
More core for ea VM or more VMs, More PCIe Lans for VMs, faster clocks per VM

Cons
Cost $$$(Ram/ MB / CPU / Cooling / Overall) , Overkill, 180w
....


Hmm now after that thinking maybe 2700x will be my best bet.

Arg
Posted on Reply
#77
Konceptz
neko77025I have been eyeballing A Ryzen 1700 as A upgrade to A few PCs I have running (as in dropping 3x pcs for ESXi VMs) .. but not sure if I am try to talk my self into or out of getting A 1950x .

1700
Pros
Cheaper, only 65w, all I really need to replace 3computers and only need 2 sticks of ram to get up and running

cons
Not as cool ?
-----
1950x
Pros
More core for ea VM or more VMs, More PCIe Lans for VMs, faster clocks per VM

Cons
Cost $$$(Ram/ MB / CPU / Cooling / Overall) , Overkill, 180w
....


Hmm now after that thinking maybe 2700x will be my best bet.

Arg
I recently built 2 ESXi hosts for clients, one using TR and the other using a 1800. Honestly you cant go wrong either way but if I were you, i'd wait for the Ryzen 2700 (i think?) if its still coming or go threadripper if you need the PCI lanes.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 11:16 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts