Monday, November 12th 2018
Intel Puts Out Additional "Cascade Lake" Performance Numbers
Intel late last week put out additional real-world HPC and AI compute performance numbers of its upcoming "Cascade Lake" 2x 48-core (96 cores in total) machine, compared to AMD's EPYC 7601 2x 32-core (64 cores in total) machine. You'll recall that on November 5th, the company put out Linpack, System Triad, and Deep Learning Inference numbers, which are all synthetic benchmarks. In a new set of slides, the company revealed a few real-world HPC/AI application performance numbers, including MIMD Lattice Computation (MILC), Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), OpenFOAM, NAMD scalable molecular dynamics, and YaSK.
The Intel 96-core setup with 12-channel memory interface belts out up to 1.5X performance in MILC, up to 1.6X in WRF and OpenFOAM, up to 2.1X in NAMD, and up to 3.1X in YASK, compared to an AMD EPYC 7601 2P machine. The company also put out system configuration and disclaimer slides with the usual forward-looking CYA. "Cascake Lake" will be Intel's main competitor to AMD's EPYC "Rome" 64-core 4P-capable processor that comes out by the end of 2018. Intel's product is a multi-chip module of two 24~28 core dies, with a 2x 6-channel DDR4 memory interface.
The Intel 96-core setup with 12-channel memory interface belts out up to 1.5X performance in MILC, up to 1.6X in WRF and OpenFOAM, up to 2.1X in NAMD, and up to 3.1X in YASK, compared to an AMD EPYC 7601 2P machine. The company also put out system configuration and disclaimer slides with the usual forward-looking CYA. "Cascake Lake" will be Intel's main competitor to AMD's EPYC "Rome" 64-core 4P-capable processor that comes out by the end of 2018. Intel's product is a multi-chip module of two 24~28 core dies, with a 2x 6-channel DDR4 memory interface.
18 Comments on Intel Puts Out Additional "Cascade Lake" Performance Numbers
It will take a comprehensive number of applications with and without AVX capabilities that have, in previous CPU gen, either favored Intel or AMD, to truly discern whether or not Intel's upcoming CPUs are better than AMD's upcoming CPUs and to showcase whatever improvements to both platforms the new generations will bring.
We shall see ...
Too bad the software it's still on IT Stonage for multicore setups...
I haven't read about that before, any source? As far as I knew Intel wasn't going the MCM route, but makes sense perhaps a monolithic 48 core was difficult to build.
Next year, the server situation will be:
AMD Server CPUs will have:
- more cores
- more memory channels
- more PCIe lanes
- a fraction of the cost of Intel's
- less energy needed to run
- better scalability
- more features (Secure Memory Encryption and Secure Encrypted Virtualization, Codescaling)
- more flexibility
- a functional process to build it on
- process lead
- support for PCI-E v4
Intel will have:
- nice powerpoints
- very good marketing
- broken SGX
Now guess where by bet goes from here.
I'm a happy to see such good competition in cpu and good price. In gpu it's not good but OK but RAM pricing OTOH is horrible.
I don't trust these numbers one bit!