Wednesday, April 17th 2019
![NVIDIA](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/nvidia-v1723747195848.png)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Specifications and Price Revealed
NVIDIA is releasing its most affordable graphics card based on the "Turing" architecture, the GeForce GTX 1650, on the 23rd of April, starting at USD $149. There doesn't appear to be a reference-design (the GTX 1660 series lacked one, too), and so this GPU will be a partner-driven launch. Based on NVIDIA's smallest "Turing" silicon, the 12 nm "TU117," the GTX 1650 will pack 896 CUDA cores and will feature 4 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit wide memory interface.
The GPU is clocked at 1485 MHz with 1665 MHz GPU Boost, and the 8 Gbps memory produces 128 GB/s of memory bandwidth. With a TDP of just 75 Watts, most GTX 1650 cards will lack additional PCIe power inputs, relying entirely on the slot for power. Most entry-level implementations of the GTX 1650 feature very simple aluminium fan-heatsink coolers. VideoCardz compiled a number of leaked pictures of upcoming GTX 1650 graphics cards.
Sources:
VideoCardz, VonGuru
The GPU is clocked at 1485 MHz with 1665 MHz GPU Boost, and the 8 Gbps memory produces 128 GB/s of memory bandwidth. With a TDP of just 75 Watts, most GTX 1650 cards will lack additional PCIe power inputs, relying entirely on the slot for power. Most entry-level implementations of the GTX 1650 feature very simple aluminium fan-heatsink coolers. VideoCardz compiled a number of leaked pictures of upcoming GTX 1650 graphics cards.
109 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Specifications and Price Revealed
And then there's the warranty, case quality, size etc. You get what you pay for. :-)
People buying new stuff can, as @cucker tarlson suggested, add $50 and get a much faster card. That would be the best spent $50 in their build - worth saving elsewhere. Techpowerup's own review:
www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/RX_570_Pulse/28.html Yes, it's an overclocked card, but that's the one to get. RX570 on stock isn't that impressive (much like RX470) - making GTX1060 3GB a much better choice (or RX580 if you have the power to spare).
1660 ended up 20% faster than 1060 with 10% more shaders and same bandwidth.
With 17% more shaders and 14% more bandwidth 1650 will be around 1050ti though :laugh:
this card will trade blows with 570 bar games that utilize amd cards more effectively than nvidia like bf,at the same time using no extrenal power connectors.
RX570 is literally consuming twice the power and gives out twice the heat. This is a significant difference even if the performance delta would be 40% (which is very unlikely).
RX570 was intended to be a competitor to GTX 1060 3GB. These two are still comparable cards in performance but no longer in price. Price-wise, today:
- GTX 1060 3GB is being sold starting 170€ (MSRP $199, later lowered to $179)
- RX570 4GB is being sold starting 120€ (MSRP $169)
- GTX 1050Ti is being sold starting 120€ (MSRP $139)
- RX560 is being sold starting 100€ (MSRP $100)
- GTX 1050 is being sold starting 120€ (MSRP $109)
(EU prices in € and rougly same as MSRP in $, primarily due to taxes)
Note that there is a noticeable pressure on prices of the cards around RX570 while cards positioned lower than that (RX560 and GTX 1050 being examples here) cannot get much lower than where they are.
There are a lot of factors in play, mining and used cards market - especially related to mining - are big ones. Upcoming cards are starting to affect the prices of old ones (more of this on Nvidia side right now) but the pricing on RX570 does not seem very sustainable at this level (in terms of profits for AMD).
If you want look: twitter.com/tum_apisak
As for the set you've built:
I'm sure the client can switch to a more powerful GPU, but how's that important? You said you sold a 1050. That's it. He would now have to pay for 2 cards. :-P
Also, the CPU you put in that set was already too powerful for the GPU. What's the point of overclocking?
No offense, but it seems like you've built someone a computer for benchmarks, not games. ;-)
If you look at smaller and simpler versions, like Sapphire Pulse ITX, they're another 5% slower.
trog