Monday, May 13th 2019

BIOSTAR Racing X570GT8 Zen 2 Motherboard Pictured and Detailed

MSI, without naming its product, teased its MEG X570 Ace motherboard late last week, obeying the cardinal rules of a teaser, such as not putting out clear pictures or names. BIOSTAR probably wanted to do something similar, but ended up leaking glaring details and pictures of its flagship socket AM4 motherboard based on the AMD X570 chipset, the Racing X570GT8. The X570 is AMD's first in-house design chipset for the AM4 socket after "Promontory" and FM2-based "Bolton," supplied by ASMedia. It was necessitated by the need to get downstream PCIe connectivity from the chipset to be certified for the latest generations (gen 3.0 or later), by AMD, and overcome many of the connectivity limitations of ASMedia "Promontory," from which AMD carved out previous socket AM4 chipsets.

Design compulsions of being a flagship product aside, there are signs of a clear focus on strengthening the CPU VRM on the Racing X570GT8, to cope with the rumored Ryzen 9 series 16-core "Zen 2" processor. The board draws power from a combination of 24-pin ATX and 8+4 pin EPS connectors, conditioning it for the processor with a 12-phase VRM. There are two metal-reinforced PCI-Express x16 slots wired to the AM4 SoC, and we get the first glimpse of the PCI-Express gen 4.0 lane switching and re-driver circuitry. We haven't seen anything to suggest that the downstream PCIe lanes from the X570 chipset are gen 4.0, yet, but we expect them to at least be gen 3.0. The presence of three M.2 slots bodes well for the downstream PCIe lane count. ASMedia "Promontory" puts out a paltry eight gen 2.0 lanes. It's also interesting to see an active fan-heatsink cooling the X570 chipset, indicating a rather high TDP compared to the 3-5 Watt TDP of the 400-series "Promontory" low-power variant chipsets. The component choices by BIOSTAR look premium and are a callback to its T-Power glory days enthusiasts remember.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

38 Comments on BIOSTAR Racing X570GT8 Zen 2 Motherboard Pictured and Detailed

#26
TheLostSwede
News Editor
natr0nIf I could name a crayon color...Biostar Yellow.
That doesn't rhyme though...
Posted on Reply
#27
natr0n
TheLostSwedeThat doesn't rhyme though...
If I could name a crayon color...Biostar Yellow Butter.
Posted on Reply
#28
silentbogo
MescalambaSarcasm?

I think bad RAM overclock is kinda, well bad for AMD. Given how it scales.
Not sarcasm, just the obvious. Their previous X470GT8 was really bad at memory OC even by Zen standards. E.g. peaking at 2933MHz at any timings on any kit (though BIOSTAR promised a moderate 3200MHz effective clock). Judging by the new specs and layout - it's the same base/platform. 4000MHz might be a bit optimistic, but we'll see.
bonehead123In that 1st photo on the left, it looks like there is a VGA connector and possibly 2 USB connectors sticking up from the right edge of the cooling fan.....or is that just my imagination ??
Yep, that's a B450 board with VGA
TheLostSwedeNo motherboard maker would tout those numbers without passing memtest.
You'll be surprised (especially on the low/mid-end). They can throw any numbers around as long as they have at least one specific kit that boots at that speed.
The rest is always "circumstantial".
Posted on Reply
#29
PanicLake
A fan on the motherboard chipset? No thank you, that will rattle like crazy in a couple of years and be not replaceable because of the custom implementation.
Posted on Reply
#30
xorbe
Even after leaking full hi-res pics of a motherboard, what has really been leaked, nothing. It's gonna have all the usual stuff. Can't see squat because of heatsinks, even if there was something interesting there.
Posted on Reply
#31
_UV_
GinoLatinoA fan on the motherboard chipset? No thank you, that will rattle like crazy in a couple of years and be not replaceable because of the custom implementation.
more important if they placing it for no reason, or new PCH really need it and we all get dead mobos from other brands who decide to put cheap passive solution in 2-3 years like it was with nForce
Posted on Reply
#32
dicktracy
RIP DDR4-5000 rumors. It wasn't even a week old rumor yet LOL.
Posted on Reply
#33
efikkan
The pictured board might be a prototype board, so I wouldn't read too much into the tiny details, production boards might have slight deviations. Even some of the boards we expect to see at Computex might still be prototype boards.

I always recommend waiting a little while for good motherboard reviews on new platforms, and of course see if there are any major BIOS issues to be resolved. I wouldn't pick a random motherboard on launch day, or the first week for that matter.
Posted on Reply
#34
Xuper
TheLostSwedeHuh? This has what to do with Biostar's OC setting for 4000?
He was able to get DDR4 4000 on Ryzen 2700X, Now Biostar claims up to DDR4 4K on X570 , on other hand they mean it will pass memtest.They wrote up to 3200Mhz for X470 and 4000 for X570.that's BIG Different , they know what's going on with memory controller on Ryzen CPU.
Posted on Reply
#35
Caring1
GinoLatinoA fan on the motherboard chipset? No thank you, that will rattle like crazy in a couple of years and be not replaceable because of the custom implementation.
My Asrock X79 says hi.
Posted on Reply
#36
TheLostSwede
News Editor
_UV_more important if they placing it for no reason, or new PCH really need it and we all get dead mobos from other brands who decide to put cheap passive solution in 2-3 years like it was with nForce
It's there for a reason, but you won't get dead boards without it. X570 gets a lot hotter, especially for those planning on doing M.2 PCIe 4.0 RAID. There are ways around this, but it would be more expensive than using a fan. As such, expect fans on the lower cost boards.
dicktracyRIP DDR4-5000 rumors. It wasn't even a week old rumor yet LOL.
That was just a max setting.
Posted on Reply
#37
TesterAnon
As long there are cheap replacements for the fans or atleast ball bearing instead sleeve bearing shouldn't be a problem.
And looking at the size of it i fail to see why they couldn't add 4 screw holes for a 40 or 60mm fan to replace it if it ever dies.
Posted on Reply
#38
HwGeek
If it's ain't gonna be OCed well- why bother with 8+4 pin CPU Power? since with 7nm AMD can offer twice the 2700X performance at same Power, looks like they can be OCed by 25% (vs current 12nm) so they can run the 16C with twice the TDP of 2700X(12.5% clock bump to current 2700X clocks + another 12.5% OC headroom).
Either way this 16C could be a beast!.
For Example: 8C16T 2700X replacment will be 4.0Ghz Base, 4.8Ghz Boost, 5.35Ghz OC limit on AVG.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 6th, 2024 07:20 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts