Friday, August 23rd 2019

Alleged Leaked Details on Intel Comet Lake-S Platform Require... You Guessed It... A New Platform

Intel's development of their Core architecture in the post-Ryzen world has been slow, with solutions slowly creeping up in core counts with every new CPU release - but much slowly than rival AMD's efforts. Before Intel can capitalize on a new, more scalable and power-efficient architecture, though, it has to deliver performance and core count increases across its product line to stay as relevant as possible against a much revitalized rival. Enter Comet Lake-S: the desktop parts of Intel's new round of consumer CPUs, which will reportedly see an increase in the maximum core count to a 10-core design. This 10-core design, however, comes with an increase in power consumption (up to 135 W), and the need, once again, for beefier power delivery systems in a new, LGA 1200 package (with 9 more pins that the current LGA 1151).

The move to a new socket and the more stringent power requirements give Intel the opportunity to refresh its chipset offerings once again. If everything stays the same (and there's no reason it should change), new Z470 and Z490 chipsets should be some of the higher tier offerings for builders to pair with their motherboards. The new Comet Lake-S CPUs will still be built in the now extremely refined 14 nm process, and allegedly keep the same 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes as current Coffee Lake Refresh offerings. The new CPU offerings from Intel are expected to roll out in Q1 2020.
Sources: XFastest, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

224 Comments on Alleged Leaked Details on Intel Comet Lake-S Platform Require... You Guessed It... A New Platform

#176
GlacierNine
ToxicTaZ9900KS is 95w based and with workload 195w around.

You're 3900X is almost 400 Watts gaming! Then again it's two 6 cores CPUs working together...
That's whole system power consumption. You can tell by the fact the chart BEGINS with an i3 8300 pulling 348 watts.
Posted on Reply
#177
Chrispy_
MMmmm, where can I buy me one of these 348W i3 chips? It gets cold here in winter.
:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#178
Vlada011
I would like to see how will be interest for this platform.
14nm... AMD is 7nm. PCI-E 3.0, AMD PCI-E 4.0. :)
Posted on Reply
#179
goodeedidid
GungarThey already told us they will go directly to PCIE 5.0 in 2021.
That makes no sense.
Posted on Reply
#180
svan71
GungarThey already told us they will go directly to PCIE 5.0 in 2021.
I'll wait, they said they were going to 10nm in 2015 so they are good with these promises.
Posted on Reply
#181
ToxicTaZ
goodeedididThat makes no sense.
Makes a lot ot of sense!

First off Q4 2021 is Intel release date for their 7nm tech..... (equivalent TSMC 3nm) so leaping over the competition with 7nm and PCIe 5.0 makes sense.

BTW
PCIe 6.0 is ready!

www.techpowerup.com/256634/pci-sig-announces-pcie-6-0-specification

Personally they should go right to PCIe 6.0 my opinion... As PCIe 5.0 is already becoming old specs as they are working on PCIe 7.0 now.....
Posted on Reply
#182
lexluthermiester
ToxicTaZMakes a lot ot of sense!

First off Q4 2021 is Intel release date for their 7nm tech..... (equivalent TSMC 3nm) so leaping over the competition with 7nm and PCIe 5.0 makes sense.

BTW
PCIe 6.0 is ready!

www.techpowerup.com/256634/pci-sig-announces-pcie-6-0-specification

Personally they should go right to PCIe 6.0 my opinion... As PCIe 5.0 is already becoming old specs as they are working on PCIe 7.0 now.....
No, he's right, doesn't make sense at all.. Nothing currently on the market can saturate the PCIe3 bus, let alone PCIe4, or 5 or 6. Jumping ahead will be very expensive and benefit no one.
Posted on Reply
#183
Gungar
svan71I'll wait, they said they were going to 10nm in 2015 so they are good with these promises.
Oh yeah the famous quote, they failed one thing and now they aren't trust worthy. Sad human.
Posted on Reply
#184
Chrispy_
GungarOh yeah the famous quote, they failed one thing and now they aren't trust worthy. Sad human.
Well they also promised the same thing in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. And although 10nm is *technically* here, the overwhelming majority of their current production is still on 14++++++++
Posted on Reply
#185
ToxicTaZ
Chrispy_Well they also promised the same thing in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. And although 10nm is *technically* here, the overwhelming majority of their current production is still on 14++++++++
Guess It doesn't matter when you still have the fastest 8 cores CPU on Earth!

9900KS nothing touches it!

Let the benchmarks begin!
Posted on Reply
#186
eterniti
no PCIE 4
optane is much more useful than pcie 4, if you use large optane disks for caching you are golden with professional applications and simulations, and even games
for now the pcie 4 is making things worse in therms of an additional fan prone to failures, I agree I'd rather have it , but the expensive optane is better
Posted on Reply
#187
trparky
Keviny OliveiraR.I.P Intel, AMD current is better
For those on a budget, yes... AMD does win over Intel.
Posted on Reply
#188
ToxicTaZ
Keviny OliveiraR.I.P Intel, AMD current is better

lol
Lol

Yet AMD has nothing to go against the 9900KS

Let the Gaming Benchmarks begin!
Posted on Reply
#189
trparky
ToxicTaZYet AMD has nothing to go against the 9900KS

Let the Gaming Benchmarks begin!
It doesn't matter for those of us who can't afford the "Intel Tax". We can drool all we want over Intel benchmarks but it doesn't matter at the end of the day if you can't afford to buy a 9900KS.

For instance, at my local Microcenter store a 9900K is nearly $470, plus tax that's nearly $510. To have the processor alone be nearly half the cost of your build is insane.
Posted on Reply
#190
ToxicTaZ
trparkyIt doesn't matter for those of us who can't afford the "Intel Tax". We can drool all we want over Intel benchmarks but it doesn't matter at the end of the day if you can't afford to buy a 9900KS.

For instance, at my local Microcenter store a 9900K is nearly $470, plus tax that's nearly $510. To have the processor alone be nearly half the cost of your build is insane.
Lol
3900X is selling for $699. In Canada how is that cheap?? The 3950X is even more!!!.... Let's not talk about Threadripper 3....

Don't know what kind of PC Gaming RIG you're trying to build but good advice don't bother! You can't even buy a new Smartphone for the money you're talking about let alone a new gaming RIG PC is 3x the price of the top phones that are out now! iPhone 11, Pixel 4, Note 10, ROG Phone 2 etc etc....

What's the point of running jug fest?

Do yourself a favor and get the 9900KS and have a kick ass CPU that actually performs gaming performance.

9900KS is very soon let the benchmarks begin!

CometLake also going to be very interesting with 10 cores 5GHz even faster than the 9900KS just blows my mind.
Posted on Reply
#191
trparky
Who says you need that kind of high-end AMD processor? You don’t need a 3900X when a 3600X is more than capable and won’t break your bank account.

It sounds to me like you have a lot of disposable income. Congratulations, many of us don’t. Most of us have to... just get by with what we can afford. If that means that we won’t be experiencing the highest most awesome gaming experience, so be it.

If one has to sacrifice in the food department just to get the best gaming experience, you need to get your priorities straightened out.
Posted on Reply
#192
Crackong
ToxicTaZLol
3900X is selling for $699. In Canada how is that cheap?? The 3950X is even more!!!.... Let's not talk about Threadripper 3....

Don't know what kind of PC Gaming RIG you're trying to build but good advice don't bother! You can't even buy a new Smartphone for the money you're talking about let alone a new gaming RIG PC is 3x the price of the top phones that are out now! iPhone 11, Pixel 4, Note 10, ROG Phone 2 etc etc....

What's the point of running jug fest?

Do yourself a favor and get the 9900KS and have a kick ass CPU that actually performs gaming performance.

9900KS is very soon let the benchmarks begin!

CometLake also going to be very interesting with 10 cores 5GHz even faster than the 9900KS just blows my mind.
1. 3900x is $499 , 3950x is $749
2. You can't play PC games on a phone, done.
3. 10 core CometLake is nothing but a nuclear reactor, check my calculation at #175
4. I am pretty sure the 10 core CometLake will be beaten by Intel's own 9900k(s) in terms of gaming, because it will thermal throttle and struggle to reach 5GHz all-core.
Posted on Reply
#193
ToxicTaZ
Huh?
1. Like I said before many times before the 3900X is $699.

www.memoryexpress.com/Search/Products?Search=3900X

2. Who said anything about playing PC games on their phone? I pointed out that people are trying to build gaming RIGs the same price as a new top phone.

3. "Nuclear Reactor"? Time for you to go back to school. Want to see a nuclear reactor? Run any AMD 3000 series @5GHz and see what happens.

4. 9900KS already blows away all AMD 3000 series in gaining performance! Cometlake will be even faster!
Posted on Reply
#194
GlacierNine
I don't get it. Why exactly are you pouring so much time and effort into praising Intel here?

They're a multibillion dollar corporation. They're not your friend. They don't care about you. Neither does AMD. All they're here to do is take your money.

I'd really like to know exactly why you feel obligated to defend them any time someone thinks that another product might be more suitable for their purposes.
Posted on Reply
#195
Crackong
ToxicTaZHuh?
1. Like I said before many times before the 3900X is $699.

www.memoryexpress.com/Search/Products?Search=3900X

2. Who said anything about playing PC games on their phone? I pointed out that people are trying to build gaming RIGs the same price as a new top phone.

3. "Nuclear Reactor"? Time for you to go back to school. Want to see a nuclear reactor? Run any AMD 3000 series @5GHz and see what happens.

4. 9900KS already blows away all AMD 3000 series in gaining performance! Cometlake will be even faster!
1. pcpartpicker.com/product/tLCD4D/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-36-ghz-12-core-processor-100-100000023box , $499 / $529

2. Then why are you mentioning ?

3. 135W in a 200mm² package is nuclear, DO THE MATH Genius.

4. 9900ks in gaming will blow 10 core Cometlake out of nowhere, Guaranteed.
Posted on Reply
#196
Kapone33
ToxicTaZHuh?
1. Like I said before many times before the 3900X is $699.

www.memoryexpress.com/Search/Products?Search=3900X

2. Who said anything about playing PC games on their phone? I pointed out that people are trying to build gaming RIGs the same price as a new top phone.

3. "Nuclear Reactor"? Time for you to go back to school. Want to see a nuclear reactor? Run any AMD 3000 series @5GHz and see what happens.

4. 9900KS already blows away all AMD 3000 series in gaining performance! Cometlake will be even faster!
1. So Gaming is the be all and end all of CPUs and that 10% at 1080P is great? To me it is a total waste to buy anything over the 3700X for gaming (at 1080P). You seem to be uber confident about a product that has not even launched yet. Neither do we know what this will cost. The 3900X is at that price because it beats the 9900K and probably the 9900KS in everything other than gaming.

2. You can definitely build a gaming PC for less than the top Smart phone even the R5 2600 is good enough for that.

www.amazon.ca/AMD-YD2600BBAFBOX-Processeur-RYZEN5-Socket/dp/B07B41WS48/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=R5+2600&qid=1568721388&sr=8-1

$189

www.amazon.ca/GIGABYTE-B450M-DS3H-Ryzen-Motherboard/dp/B07FWVJSHC/ref=sxin_0_sk-recsbyspec-1-0c04db5d-295a-49fb-bdf0-da5f83b3894e?keywords=B450&pd_rd_i=B07FWVJSHC&pd_rd_r=1e9105db-713d-4351-898c-ffde5f1e8500&pd_rd_w=VkoHA&pd_rd_wg=1DSHh&pf_rd_p=bc0912d9-f3aa-4379-98df-8dfc3bbbb61b&pf_rd_r=7VJVPAFZW6Z0D7445FSF&qid=1568721410

$100

www.amazon.ca/Corsair-Vengeance-3000MHz-Deskt6+p-Memory/dp/B0134EW7G8/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=16gb+ddr4+3000&qid=1568721451&s=electronics&sr=1-3

$100

www.amazon.ca/PowerColor-570-AXRX-4GBD5-3DHD-OC/dp/B06ZYRRW9T/ref=sr_1_8?keywords=RX+570&qid=1568721486&s=electronics&sr=1-8

$191

www.amazon.ca/Thermaltake-Certified-Active-Supply-PS-SPD-0600NPCWUS-W/dp/B014W3EMAO/ref=sr_1_3?crid=3567NWH9HTWUA&keywords=600w+power+supply&qid=1568721540&s=electronics&sprefix=600W%2Celectronics%2C248&sr=1-3


$65

Right there is $645 but let's got to the cost of the 3900X

www.amazon.ca/Deepcool-Tesseract-SW-WH-Window-TESSERACT/dp/B017WECPMM/ref=sr_1_8?keywords=Deepcool+case&qid=1568721683&s=electronics&sr=1-8

So right there a $700 Gaming PC that is good enough for most newbs. Is there any part of this build that sucks?

3. As far as Intel those CPUs go up to 90+C on an OC my 12 core does not go past 65 under load (using the same software).

4. You don't know that, let's keep in mind that the FX chips could clock to 4.9 and beyond and the 9590 was a 5GHZ processor. Then we get Ryzen that does not clock as high but has higher IPC and is faster. The only thing Intel has over Ryzen is single core clock speed so Comet Lake may see IPC gains but not 5 GHZ OC with a node shrink. There is also the fact that more and more games are and will be using multi cores. No one on this forum knows any of the official details about Comet lake including you so don't boast about something that is not yet a reality.
Posted on Reply
#197
Crackong
kapone32Comet Lake may see IPC gains but not 5 GHZ OC with a node shrink.
CometLake is still 14nm +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

We saw what happened from 14nm 6 cores Ringbus -> 14nm 8 cores Ringbus
We can safely expect a portable nuclear reactor for 14nm 10 cores Ringbus . :)
Posted on Reply
#198
trparky
ToxicTaZ9900KS already blows away all AMD 3000 series in gaining performance! Cometlake will be even faster!
And I don't care!!! I don't care about a processor that's outside of my PC budget.

If Intel wants me to buy their stuff from now on, they're going to have to seriously drop their prices. Nearly $500 after-tax for a 9900K is absolutely insane for me. Intel really needs to drop their prices by a decent amount of they're going to continue to have their product be purchased by people who, like me, can get by with slightly less gaming performance while paying a whole lot less. Intel is going to be losing a lot of people in the mid to high segment of the market if they expect people to pay their absolutely insane prices. AMD will have a much better product that will perform within a few percentage points while costing significantly less.

I can say the same thing about an RTX2080Ti which is priced at $1069.99 ($1160.95 after-tax). There is no way in Heaven or Hell that I'm going to pay that damn much, Jen-Hsun Huang is out of his damn mind.
Posted on Reply
#199
Kapone33
CrackongCometLake is still 14nm +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

We saw what happened from 14nm 6 cores Ringbus -> 14nm 8 cores Ringbus
We can safely expect a portable nuclear reactor for 14nm 10 cores Ringbus . :)
There are so many "Lake releases" that I can't even keep up. You are absolutely right about the heat production though. Remember when Intel used a home air conditioner to cool their 28 core Skylake_X at Computex :laugh:
trparkyAnd I don't care!!! I don't care about a processor that's outside of my PC budget.

If Intel wants me to buy their stuff from now on, they're going to have to seriously drop their prices. Nearly $500 after-tax for a 9900K is absolutely insane for me. Intel really needs to drop their prices by a decent amount of they're going to continue to have their product be purchased by people who, like me, can get by with slightly less gaming performance while paying a whole lot less. Intel is going to be losing a lot of people in the mid to high segment of the market if they expect people to pay their absolutely insane prices. AMD will have a much better product that will perform within a few percentage points while costing significantly less.

I can say the same thing about an RTX2080Ti which is priced at $1069.99 ($1160.95 after-tax). There is no way in Heaven or Hell that I'm going to pay that damn much, Jen-Hsun Huang is out of his damn mind.
That sentiment is exactly why AMD is on the Ryse ;).
Posted on Reply
#200
juiseman
I still say that Intel has to have something big up its sleeve.
They are getting spanked like a naughty child ATM. Either that, or they just don't care about Desktop performance CPU's as much
as their enterprise hold.
The only thing, is; Epyc is good there as well. Whos knows.....not me for sure...just pure speculation....
I really want to see what Threadripper can do, I don't need that kind of power yet, but the Nerd in me wants to see some benchmarks.....
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 15th, 2025 05:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts