Thursday, January 23rd 2020

MSI Says not all Radeon RX 5600 XT GPUs Can Hit 14 Gbps Memory Speed

Just before the launch of AMD's latest Radeon RX 5600 XT graphics cards, AMD released a vBIOS update that boosts the GPU clock speed by a few percent margins and increases the GDDR6 memory speed from 12 Gbps to 14 Gbps, which is almost a 17% performance increase in memory bandwidth. However, despite the release of these new firmware updates, AMD's add-in-board partners like ASUS and MSI have been cautious about applying the new vBIOS to the existing cards. A YouTube show called the MSI Insider, which is hosted by MSI employees, explains the situation. Due to the GDDR6 memory, which was originally meant as a 12 Gbps chip, when applying the new firmware update to the card can lead to RMA issues with customers.

While some cards are capable of hitting 14 Gbps speeds with the GDDR6 chips, others are not as they were not certified to work at that frequency. Silicon lottery (not the company) of the memory chips plays a big role as the quality of the onboard DRAM will have a large impact on the ability to overclock to new frequencies. That's why MSI released an RX 5600 XT GAMING Z variant with 14 Gbps vBIOS already applied out of the box. ASUS also joined the party and launched the ASUS ROG STRIX TOP graphics card, which is the only 14 Gbps enabled cards in ASUS'es whole lineup. By launching GPU SKUs with 14 Gbps speeds out of the box, manufacturers can guarantee these speeds and not depend on silicon lottery which may cause them a few RMA troubles down the road.
Source: VideoCards
Add your own comment

86 Comments on MSI Says not all Radeon RX 5600 XT GPUs Can Hit 14 Gbps Memory Speed

#51
londiste
theoneandonlymrkThese cards are priced between 250-380£ uk pounds.
There's got to be some differences in that, but I agree it's all been brought out in a turd way, could be leak's putting such a bad light on it but it should have been handled before the rumours.
The original specs are not changed and based on AMD statement will not be changed. Best case scenario is AIBs quickly phasing out the models with 12Gbps VRAM and replacing these with 14Gbps models - hopefully with a different model name. Worst case scenario is RX 5600XT on the market with 10% (and based on some reviews, larger) performance delta between models.
Posted on Reply
#52
KainXS
The reference board probably did have the 14Gbps modules on them but its still a shitty move because if AMD tells AIB's what they should target and they can still hit that with 12Gbps modules which was completely possible then AMD should have probably let them know ahead of time. Now theres this situation of cheaper cards not having modules fast enough and the situation where some like powercolor are having where they now need to up the cooling on some of their cards. For example the first Red Dragon 5600XT's have 1 heat pipe but after learning of the bios Powercolor made the desicion to add another heat pipe to the Red Dragons even though the V1 cards are still being sold. That also means that most of these cards haven't even been validated yet which is ridiculous. Also just because the card does have the 14Gbps modules does not mean that it can hold those clocks with any stability if the original board design was for the 12Gbps memory.
Posted on Reply
#53
HugsNotDrugs
Anyone savvy enough to apply the BIOS update should be savvy enough to test their memory at 14 Gbps before doing so.
Posted on Reply
#54
Nihilus
It's clear that Navi 10 was an overpriced gpu for this configuration. When paired with true 14 gb/s memory, board partners are having a tough time selling the for much cheaper than the 5700.

This card is a fail for the board partners. AMD would have been better off running Navi 14 with 12 gb/s of 192 bit GDDR6. Most likely they could have sold it as a high volume mid-range product in the $230 or lower range, competing against the 1660 Super.
Posted on Reply
#55
GoldenX
why not just increase the timings of those unable to reach 14?
Posted on Reply
#56
Vya Domus
londisteIn case of RX5600 XT, AMD's own specs say 12GBps - @jabbadap linked above to AMD specs page: www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/graphics
Anandtech has details about the last-minute BIOS changes: www.anandtech.com/show/15422/the-amd-radeon-rx-5600-xt-review/2
I am not talking about that, I am referring to specific modules that they employ. Manufacturers can't change the modules or the supplier on a whim just because on AMD's web page it says "12Gbps" and that's good enough. Cards usually are shipped with a different BIOS depending on what modules are used if for some reason they decided to use more than one type or supplier, that's for an oblivious reason, not every module will do even if it meets the speed requirement.

Nothing gets in a card without AMD's knowledge and approval because it wont work otherwise.
Posted on Reply
#57
Unregistered
I like MSI...My mobo is MSI...My brand of choice is MSI.
That said I fully feel as if MSI buys lower grade components that are rated for what they are but aren't good enough to do a bit more and they''ll use it on anything, even high end.
I know this going in and my next platform will likely be MSI based
Posted on Edit | Reply
#58
TheGuruStud
Lie or did they buy some knockoff chips from china?
Posted on Reply
#59
Darmok N Jalad
londisteCmon. Cards are not built on recommendations. Cards are built to specifications. Check the AMD 5600XT release slides, check the AMD specs page for 5600XT and read what Anandtech review writes on topic.
I was going to post something similar. AMD offered no reference design, which is all the more convenient with this mess. However, the pre-launch clocks are still the base requirement in order to sell as a 5600XT. The revised launch specs are the guidance for the OC models, likely throwing a bone to OEMs to sell this card without needing an immediate price cut. Personally, I think they just made a mess of this and left their OEMs holding the bag. They played a game of chicken with nvidia and swerved too late. They didn’t seem to communicate well with partners. It will all get sorted out, but it sounds there will be 2 versions of this card out there now.
Posted on Reply
#60
Totally
cucker tarlsonlook at the names who's complaining about the aibs
no surpise
tbf, whenever AMD does crap like this happens MSI always seems to be front and center or the only board partner that can't handle the changes.
Posted on Reply
#61
Krzych
I see the excuse was already developed :P AMD makes a last minute drastic change to specification, the most unprofessional move imaginable, putting board partners in terrible position, but soon it will be board partner's fault because of false accusations about using poor quality components. You people just don't deserve these cards, neither does AMD.
Posted on Reply
#63
londiste
Vya DomusI am not talking about that, I am referring to specific modules that they employ. Manufacturers can't change the modules or the supplier on a whim just because on AMD's web page it says "12Gbps" and that's good enough. Cards usually are shipped with a different BIOS depending on what modules are used if for some reason they decided to use more than one type or supplier, that's for an oblivious reason, not every module will do even if it meets the speed requirement.

Nothing gets in a card without AMD's knowledge and approval because it wont work otherwise.
You are flat out wrong here. Memory modules are standard spec and many graphics cards use memory modules from different vendors. If memory module meets the speed requirement it will work. If it is a faster memory module it is fine - it will work at a lower speed as BIOS dictates.
Posted on Reply
#64
Prima.Vera
kingsThis thread will be already on the 3rd page of complaints about how scumbag Nvidia is. :D
Everybody knows nGreedia is a scumbag, we don't need another thread to confirm this.
Posted on Reply
#65
ixi
Ohh no, all the bad gddr6 ram can't go/support 14Gb/s. Who we gonna call? MSI ghost busters!
Posted on Reply
#66
Melvis
Yeah its all a bit of a stuff up but at the same time its a good thing, we should thank both companies Nvidia and AMD, Nvidia for dropping prices that forced AMDs hand and AMD then to give us a free upgrade in performance and keeping the prices the same, in the end its us the consumer that wins, even if it is a bit messy.
Posted on Reply
#67
Vayra86
And people wonder why AMD"s GPU market share drops like a stone.

Boy... yeah I really do wonder why. How about 'this company cannot be trusted'. The number of topics on artifacting and breaking AMD GPUs are vastly outnumbering the ones on Nvidia cards, but we could never put the finger on it because things were 'as specced'. I wonder why that happens too when the market share is only a quarter of Nvidia's. Now we know better. Its not just abysmal power management and heat, its the VRAM too.

Staying FAR FAR away from this company for any GPU anytime soon. Good luck with those consoles. After 560D and non existant overclocking dreams, stalling progress, now this?!

Utterly ridiculous and if anyone somehow feels AMD deserves benefit of doubt? Get yourself checked out. This isn't a player anymore, its a leftover of what once was. Let's hope Intel can rise above anything that is IGP level performance soon. Its the last chance.

'jebaited'... pffft
MelvisYeah its all a bit of a stuff up but at the same time its a good thing, we should thank both companies Nvidia and AMD, Nvidia for dropping prices that forced AMDs hand and AMD then to give us a free upgrade in performance and keeping the prices the same, in the end its us the consumer that wins, even if it is a bit messy.
'a bit'. The company that engineers your product pushes a BIOS update that shortens the lifespan for its OWN customers, willingly, and only to gain a minimal (PR) advantage versus the direct competitor?

Yeah just a bit of a stuff up :D Its fine though, you can always flash back right? ...at your own risk.

Note that AIBs now apply a binning process to the very same chips that are deemed 'not stable', and put the better bins in '14 Gbps' GPUs. A comforting thought isn't it. I think they'll make it just past warranty. Now that's consumers winning for sure!
Totallytbf, whenever AMD does crap like this happens MSI always seems to be front and center or the only board partner that can't handle the changes.
Actually MSI is always the first telling us an honest story, and being consistent with its GPU releases and tiering. Except maybe if its coming from a random MSI rep. But this is an announcement. The real question is why AIBs are not coming out with one story together. It shows that the rest is trailing the music and unable to draw the same conclusions yet, or just slow. None of that is a good thing that shows dedication in any way, or is it?

Mark my words. These 14 Gbps models are going to be more prone to failure too.
londisteYou are flat out wrong here. Memory modules are standard spec and many graphics cards use memory modules from different vendors. If memory module meets the speed requirement it will work. If it is a faster memory module it is fine - it will work at a lower speed as BIOS dictates.
Precisely. Reading between the lines here, too huh
londisteThe original specs are not changed and based on AMD statement will not be changed. Best case scenario is AIBs quickly phasing out the models with 12Gbps VRAM and replacing these with 14Gbps models - hopefully with a different model name. Worst case scenario is RX 5600XT on the market with 10% (and based on some reviews, larger) performance delta between models.
That is the only possible way both AMD and AIBs can save face here. Pull the entire launch, recall all sold and ordered GPUs and replace with officially specced 14Gbps modules.

Anything else : 'You got screwed'
Posted on Reply
#68
medi01
cucker tarlsonoh yes,it's definitely msi who can't get all 12gbps memory chips to work at 14 gbps
Perhaps that's MSI who was "leaker suspect" and wasn't included in the "prepare for me mbump" circle.
Or perhaps they need reasons to sell overpirced 5600XTs (the most expensive AIB card is by MSI)

Powercolor/Sapphire make no such claims.


Besides, having this:

ASUS:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/asrock-releases-rx-5600-xt-performance-enhancing-vbios-easy-1-click-updater.263174/unread

Gigabyte:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/gigabyte-outs-rx-5600-xt-gaming-oc-vbios-update-and-easy-updater.263178/unread

Sapphire:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/sapphire-releases-pulse-rx-5600-xt-convenient-vbios-updates.263175/unread

MSI:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/msi-pushes-rx-5600-xt-video-bios-updates-through-dragon-center.263176/unread

Powercolor:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/powercolor-releases-rx-5600-xt-unleashed-bios.263177/



I wonder how any manufacturer would dare to make "nope, no warranty" claim.
Vayra86why AMD"s GPU market share drops like a stone.
In which parallel universe has that happened?



Posted on Reply
#69
Vayra86
medi01Perhaps that's MSI who was "leaker suspect" and wasn't included in the "prepare for me mbump" circle.
Or perhaps they need reasons to sell overpirced 5600XTs (the most expensive AIB card is by MSI)

Powercolor/Sapphire make no such claims.


Besides, having this:

ASUS:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/asrock-releases-rx-5600-xt-performance-enhancing-vbios-easy-1-click-updater.263174/unread

Gigabyte:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/gigabyte-outs-rx-5600-xt-gaming-oc-vbios-update-and-easy-updater.263178/unread

Sapphire:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/sapphire-releases-pulse-rx-5600-xt-convenient-vbios-updates.263175/unread

MSI:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/msi-pushes-rx-5600-xt-video-bios-updates-through-dragon-center.263176/unread

Powercolor:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/powercolor-releases-rx-5600-xt-unleashed-bios.263177/



I wonder how any manufacturer would dare to make "nope, no warranty" claim.


In which parallel universe has that happened?



Mindfactory.de :) Yeah. Share resurged to 30 odd percent for a short while while Nvidia couldn't sell overpriced Turing GPUs. Wooptiedoo? One bump doesn't define a trend.

Until Ampere, then its back down to 25 or lower...
Also. are you seriously enlarging a screenshot for nearly 50% 'market share' that only applies to a single year? How does that define market share? LOL... Still need your coffee?

And then there is this:
"The JPR data showed that the overall discrete GPU market was weak in the second quarter. AIB shipments down 16.6% sequentially and 39.7% YoY, which reflects the impact of excess GPU inventory after the crypto bubble burst. "

So what's really being said is that while AMD gained share from Nvidia, the net result is still down YoY and even sequentially.
Posted on Reply
#70
londiste
medi01Powercolor/Sapphire make no such claims.

Powercolor:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/powercolor-releases-rx-5600-xt-unleashed-bios.263177/

Sapphire:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/sapphire-releases-pulse-rx-5600-xt-convenient-vbios-updates.263175/unread
Yes, they do.

Well, not Sapphire but with the sole model with different memory spec and it being the launch/review card, Sapphire is in a bit of different situation here. Sapphire only has that one Pulse model that has 14Gbps in its specs from the beginning while all the other cards did not, including the ones that have the specs updated to 14Gbps now (which I assume is because they had 14Gbps memory chips to begin with). Still, that is not all 5600XT cards and there is still a good amount of 12Gbps cards.

Powercolor has 3 RX5600XT models (www.powercolor.com/products?id=1492658578&type=1577415667)
Red Devil, Red Dragon and a basic one. If you look at the Unleashed BIOS story, Red Devil and Red Dragon will get the BIOS update while basic one will not. Powercolor's specs page shows why - basic one has 12Gbps memory.
Posted on Reply
#71
Chrispy_
Is this a case of AMD specifying that Navi run with 14GB/s GDDR6 chips, and then board partners cutting corners because the original spec only called for 12GB/s operation?

AMD wouldn't change the spec to 14GB/s if they'd told manufacturers to source 12GB/s GDDR6 in the first place.

IMO, AMD made the change knowing there was headroom in the original design and it turns out that the board vendors have been taking that headroom for their own profit by using cheaper VRAM instead.
Posted on Reply
#72
londiste
AMD statement via Anandtech's reviewBased on ongoing testing with our board partners, we have raised the GPU core and memory frequencies for overclocked Radeon RX 5600 XT SKUs to take advantage of increased thermal and electrical headroom built into partner’s custom designs. The updated VBIOS has been made available to our board partners for inclusion in select OC SKUs at launch. AMD is dedicated to disrupting the market with industry-leading compute products, and the new VBIOS makes the Radeon RX 5600 XT an even more powerful contender for high-performance 1080p gaming. Previously announced product specs are unchanged, as they remain AMD’s recommended reference design specs.
Posted on Reply
#73
Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
Taking a quick look, all of Asrock's current 5600XT offerings (3) are 12's, same for Gigabyte (2), and XFX have 6 models at launch and they are all 12's, so it feels like it confirms what some have said, the base spec is 12 but there are some manufacturers simply cherry picking memory to use @ 14 and in turn make a few extra $, personally if that is true I don't have an issue with that but again as some have mentioned, if people buy a 12 card and just flash the card to 14 because there are "official" Bioses out there then that is different.
Posted on Reply
#74
Vya Domus
londisteYou are flat out wrong here. Memory modules are standard spec and many graphics cards use memory modules from different vendors. If memory module meets the speed requirement it will work. If it is a faster memory module it is fine - it will work at a lower speed as BIOS dictates.
If I am flat out wrong that must mean that the cards which use different modules from different manufactures are shipped with a different BIOS for absolutely no reason at all, right ? And if you flash the wrong BIOS, despite the fact that all chips are rated at the same speed, you brick the card.

OK, got it, makes sense.
Posted on Reply
#75
londiste
Well, technically you are right. GDDR* have timings as well. However, in most cases graphics card BIOS includes specific settings for all memory chips that it possibly supports.
From what I have seen, flashing the wrong BIOS very rarely fails due to issues with memory configuration. There are a lot more common reasons for it to fail.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 1st, 2024 10:15 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts