Monday, April 13th 2020

The COVID-19 Pandemic, or Why Chaos Isn't a Pit... It's a Ladder

I had to take that sentence from Game of Thrones' Little Finger (if you recognized it, kudos to you), since I believe it to be mostly true, given we have the right mindset about that which surrounds us. While the pandemic will always be a mainly bleak point in humanity's history, and everyday there are reports of people being their worst selves through these difficult times, there is also always opportunity for growth affixed to any great crisis. It falls upon us, our institutions, and on companies, to see really what we can learn from situations such as these.

For one, we've seen, beyond any possible ideological beliefs we may have, that the Internet is a utility, not a commodity. Its capability to bridge the gaps in geography - and in social connection - is just too important in our globalized society to be considered anything other than a fundamental right. Discussions on this point have been ongoing for a while, and debates surrounding things like the net neutrality have already given birth to rivers of both actual and digital ink. However, it is this writer's opinion that the discussion is moot, and nothing more than a speedbump until we achieve the final, inescapable truth that the Internet is a crucial part of the world's infrastructure, and not only that - of what it means to be human in our modern world.
The pandemic is an opportunity for our institutions to learn and harden; to understand exactly what kind of responses are required, and how hard the measures have to be to contain a threat to our modern society. While some lessons won't be carried forward, I believe that many of them will, and they will be there for us should we actually need to resort to a similar response to a future crisis. This global health crisis could be an opportunity for citizens to look to their healthcare system and understand whether or not that is the type of system they want to support and to be under the umbrella of.
COVID-19 Infection Rates
The pandemic is an opportunity for the world to hit a reset button for a while when it comes to the scale of pollution and resource depletion we've subjected it. Resource and ecosystem recovery from our continued pressure will take years to materialize - and won't do so at the expense of this relative blip of a pandemic. But other, more volatile signs, such as pollution, have shown tremendous improvement due to the reduced need for traffic, as governments and businesses around the world adopt teleworking as a measure to keep operating, at some level, whilst protecting their employees. Just take a look at the pollution maps on the East Coast of the United States and China: there is no scale other than the colorimetric one, but that does show us something, doesn't it? Teleworking could be the evolution that actually impacts pollution levels the most - nevermind the mainstream availability of electric cars.
Pollution levels in the USA West Coast Pollution levels in mainland China
Teleworking also gives us - but especially businesses - an opportunity to abandon the need for micromanaging their employees. It has been shown, time and again, that micromanagement strategies don't work in the office. In fact, a study led by the Stanford University found some surprising trends (to skeptics) in teleworking compared to traditional work. Telecommuters were found to work the equivalent to "a full day of work", and sometimes even more. People actually worked true full shifts (they didn't arrive late or leave early, and found it less distracting to work from home). Additionally (and incredibly), employee attrition decreased by 50 percent among the telecommuters, they took shorter breaks, had fewer sick days, and took less time off.
Traffic commute could be a thing of the past
Think about it. This means that employees were actually more productive in a teleworking environment than in the usual work environment. And it makes sense to all but the most short-minded people. No need to wake up early to drive, walk or otherwise commute a daily nightmare through traffic or public transportation, clogging the roads with polluting cars or other means of transportation. Less hours required in commuting means more hours virtually available for work. Less hours commuting also means more time at home, with their families. More meals at home, more time at home, means that people can actually learn to live as a family again, sharing meals and spending more time together than they have until now. Lesser stress levels, an increased chance for family interaction, higher productivity, lesser pollution levels, and reduced company costs in actually renting or buying floor space for their offices. What is there not to like?
The pandemic is also an opportunity for the world of tech, as strange as it may seem: it's an opportunity for improving and investing in the infrastructure of the World Wide Web. As usage patterns change and the load in the optical information highways connecting the world increases, businesses (from ISPs to data center providers) have had to increase their infrastructure investment or have adopted consumer-friendly policies, such as reducing data caps- Should the internet be any less flexible (let's say, like the healthcare or public transportation), the usage strain increase would have thrown us back into the dark ages. Instead, we saw an increase in volume of data (especially in the video category, which is responsible for some 50% to 60% of the overall Internet bandwidth usage).
Increase in Internet hourly usage in Australia
According to Vodafone, the pandemic has changed our usage habits: traffic in Spain and Italy, for example, two of the most heavily-affected countries in Europe, saw increases in the order of 50%, with peak hours also changing - from the back-from-work 6pm - 8pm to a lunch-time 12pm. Providers of streaming services reduced the quality of their transmissions to allow the internet highway to work seamlessly, accommodating increased usage from video-conferencing apps and overall communication increase amongst both people and businesses. In the last few weeks, some services saw usage ratios equivalent to that of an entire year of data flowing through their servers - and despite some outages here and there, the Internet held strong. But new investments are being made, building up the Internet as an organ capable of digesting even the more voluminous assaults on its integrity - and in the end, it will rise up stronger than ever before.

If chaos isn't a ladder, it could at least be viewed as an opportunity. And this pandemic is an opportunity for all of the above, but also for us to practice being a community, being humanity. This means not taking more than we actually need; it means taking this extra time for ourselves to look into our lives and into ourselves as humans, into our position in life and our position with our loved ones. It means we now have a rare moment of peace and quiet where we can actually hear our own thoughts, instead of the usual, unbreakable rhythm of the modern society, always craving more of our attention, more of our time, more of ourselves - assaulting us with social media, neon-like ads, traffic noises, office tensions, and a myriad other elements that all fight for our energy.
Sources: Gizmodo US Pollution, Gizmodo China Pollution, Visual Capitalist COVID 19 curve, Inc.com - Stanford Study, Vodafone peak usage, COVID Traffic INcrease - Cloudflare Blog, NBNCO
Add your own comment

35 Comments on The COVID-19 Pandemic, or Why Chaos Isn't a Pit... It's a Ladder

#26
Octopuss
Oh come on, this virus shit is pouring at us from all directions, is it really necessary to get articles about it even here?
Posted on Reply
#27
EarthDog
OctopussOh come on, this virus shit is pouring at us from all directions, is it really necessary to get articles about it even here?
The least they could do is put coronavirus in the title as that is more searched and picked up than covid-19... lol.
Posted on Reply
#28
D.Crepit
wllm_faulkner...
Again, I repeat, there is a 97% consensus among climate scientists that CC is real, and that it's also anthropogenic.
LOL... real scientists actually measure things, as opposed to make them up.
And obviously CC IS REAL... did not say otherwise...

In point of fact, a real scientist ( the kind who actually measures things ) noted
back during 9/11 that the three day grounding of air travel did in fact cause a
"measurable" and immediate cooling effect. As I noted with 90+% of air traffic
grounded, after 6+ weeks, we have what??? And for those who don't know,
air travel alone is 20% of ALL liquid fuel use. Actual oil sales are down over
30+ % world wide ( even with some "buyers" trying to boost the price by putting
it in strategic oil reserves... ) think about that one... and over a much longer
period.

Like I suggested... if anthropogenic isn't quite the big deal we thought it was...
we better find out what is, 'cuz it looks like we have near zero input in the CC
situation. AND if we have zero input... ( whether we started it or not ) we're
literally along for the ride and wasting our time discussing the matter.

Personally I hope we have at least some input.
Posted on Reply
#29
hat
Enthusiast
No way... nobody's gonna convince me that the little bit of shutdown we have going on is actually going to have a measurable effect on climate change. We've been burning fuels and pumping crap into the atmosphere for over 100 years. This doesn't even count as a dent.
Posted on Reply
#30
R-T-B
OctopussOh come on, this virus shit is pouring at us from all directions, is it really necessary to get articles about it even here?
I mean it affects us.

I'd say yes.
Posted on Reply
#31
EarthDog
R-T-BI mean it affects us.

I'd say yes.
I would have much rather seen this in one of the three existing threads... than a tech site posting their opinion about it on the front page............
Posted on Reply
#32
AnarchoPrimitiv
D.CrepitLOL... real scientists actually measure things, as opposed to make them up.
And obviously CC IS REAL... did not say otherwise...

In point of fact, a real scientist ( the kind who actually measures things ) noted
back during 9/11 that the three day grounding of air travel did in fact cause a
"measurable" and immediate cooling effect. As I noted with 90+% of air traffic
grounded, after 6+ weeks, we have what??? And for those who don't know,
air travel alone is 20% of ALL liquid fuel use. Actual oil sales are down over
30+ % world wide ( even with some "buyers" trying to boost the price by putting
it in strategic oil reserves... ) think about that one... and over a much longer
period.

Like I suggested... if anthropogenic isn't quite the big deal we thought it was...
we better find out what is, 'cuz it looks like we have near zero input in the CC
situation. AND if we have zero input... ( whether we started it or not ) we're
literally along for the ride and wasting our time discussing the matter.

Personally I hope we have at least some input.
You are absolutely INCORRECT about what happened in the days after 9/11 and what it demonstrated to scientists. What was discovered was that in the days after 9/11 because of ZERO air traffic, they discovered that global warming is WORSE than previously thought, because they found that the exhaust trails from the air traffic was actually BLOCKING sunlight, and without them, the average daily temperature increased. What this means is that if global air traffic WASN'T blocking a significant amount of sunlight on a daily basis, global warming would be WORSE.

Here is the article: www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/07/contrails.climate/index.html

On the topic of climate change, it isn't unique to our civilization, in fact, since the first signs of domestication approximately 10,000 years ago, literally, without exception, EVERY SINGLE ITERATION OF CIVILIZATION HAS COLLAPSED AND LARGELY DUE TO, IF NOT ENTIRELY DUE TO, ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION! Only hubris and ignorance make us believe our civilization is any different. The undeniable fact is, and this is based on 10,000 years of empirical data, there has yet to be a single civilization that is environmentally and ecologically sustainable. period. Anthropology 101 teaches us that the basis of civilization is agriculture and domestication, without agriculture, surplus cannot be generated, and without surplus, you cannot have specialization and division of labor or social/economic hierarchy, both required for civilization. Basically, if there's no agriculture, there's no civilization....so then, the root of the issue is agriculture, and so far, there isn't a single example of agriculture or horticulture (including "permaculture") that has been empirically proven to be sustainable in the long run....what this means is that civiliztion, based on all the evidence we currently have, IS INHERENTLY UNSUSTAINABLE and no amount of technology has been able to overcome that.

Technology!!! Let's just be honest, technology is basically the main cause of the inevitable environmental crisis. Advanced technology inherently necessitates an unsustainable global industrial order with highly centralized hierarchy and a large, subjugated work force...there's literally no other way to create advanced technology....don't believe me, just look up the mineral Coltan and how it's basically essential to every PCB, but is extremely rare and only exists in four places on earth (One of which is Africa and has been a direct cause of resource wars)...only a highly centralized, authoritarian and hierarchical system of logistics can manage the challenges behind Coltan and the products that require it. Basically, what I'm saying is, that no matter what, there are certain inherent characteristics of advanced technology than can never be altered or changed, namely that advanced technology cannot be ecologically sustainable. However, there's an even bigger problem posed by technology, and that's the psychological phenomenon of "Techno-Optimism", which is the ignorant belief in the ability of technology to miraculously solve every problem, and nearly everyone on earth is guilty of it. I can guarantee that 99% of the people on this website, whether they want to admit it or not, truly believe that some miracle technology will be created to miraculously solve the impending environmental crisis without having to make any sacrifice, and they have a relgious-like faith in this belief despite NOT having a single shred of empirical evidence to suggest this is even possible. Sorry to break the news, but as it stands, there is literally no empirical evidence to suggest that technology can solve this problem, NOR are there any potential realistic technologies that even suggest a possibility of technology solving this crisis....and yet....nearly everyone out there has an unshakable belief in this eventually occurring. (BTW, research has shown that Americans are by far the most "techno-optimistic" people on earth.

The ONLY way this environmental crisis will be avoided is through a deep, profound, revolutionary, radical, and fundamental reassessment and questioning of every foundation of our society and civilization (and whether civilization itself can ever be sustainable, because so far, there's no evidence to suggest that it is...just consider how Homo Sapiens lived in ecological balance with nature for 98% of our time on this planet as hunter-gatherers (190,000 to 290,000 years depending on whom you ask), but in the past 10,000, we have yet to demonstrate a single instance of civilization doing the same.) If anybody thinks that we have any shot of avoiding the environmental crisis without profound sacrifice, you're sadly mistaken. You can either have your precious iPhone, or clean air, food and water, but not both., so grow up and accept it, because everyone, with respect to the environment is acting like a bunch of babies not wanting to give up their unnecessary toys do our species doesn't go extinct (don't bother responding with ad hominem personal attacks against me, as they literally do absolutely nothing to disprove any of the arguments I've made and just demonstrate that you're incapable of mounting a real counter-argument)
Posted on Reply
#33
R-T-B
EarthDogI would have much rather seen this in one of the three existing threads... than a tech site posting their opinion about it on the front page............
Is it any different from any other publications front page editorial?

If he had posted this in any of those threads, it would've been all : "lol! tl;dr"

I do think editorials need their own forum news category though.
Posted on Reply
#34
EarthDog
R-T-BIs it any different from any other publications front page editorial?

If he had posted this in any of those threads, it would've been all : "lol! tl;dr"

I do think editorials need their own forum news category though.
It isnt the site that matters. ;)

But I digress.
Posted on Reply
#35
heky
I said it before and will say it again: This whole epidemic is blown way out of proportion, most likely on purpose. Even the seasonal flu killed more people this year already, not to mention diseases that really kill the most people per year. (Like Cancer, HIV, Malaria,etc)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 16th, 2024 03:51 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts