Wednesday, October 28th 2020

AMD Radeon RX 6000 "Big Navi" RDNA2 Graphics Card Launch Liveblog

After thoroughly appetizing us with its "Where Gaming Begins: Episode 1" event announcing the Ryzen 5000 series "Zen 3" processors that offer up to 19% IPC gains, in the second Episode, we see the company announcing its next-generation Radeon RX 6000 "Big Navi" graphics cards based on the RDNA2 graphics architecture that introduce full DirectX 12 Ultimate readiness, including real-time raytracing hardware. In the run up to the RX 6000, NVIDIA is already reportedly preparing product-stack updates. In this liveblog, we uncover what has NVIDIA riled up, and whether AMD can pull off better pricing and availbility than the RTX 30-series.

Update 15:59 UTC: It is time! Welcome to the Radeon RX 6000 Series live blog.
Update 16:01 UTC: AMD CEO Dr Lisa Su takes centerstage, fresh off a good quarterly results announcement, and that big Xilinx acquisition announcement.
Update 16:03 UTC: FarCry 6 seems like an AMD optimized title.

Update 16:03 UTC: Possibly the flagship product.
Update 16:04 UTC: AMD is where gaming begins because next-gen consoles trust it. - Dr Su

Update 16:05 UTC: 50% generational improvement in perf/W.
Update 16:06 UTC: 26.7 billion transistors, almost as big as GA102
Update 16:07 UTC: RDNA2 has a breakthrough high-speed design.
Update 16:08 UTC: AMD RDNA2 compute unit 30% more energy efficient.
Update 16:09 UTC: InfinityCache works to significantly improve memory bandwidth, based on the Zen L3 cache. More than 2.17x bandwidth gain despite 256-bit.
Update 16:10 UTC: 30% higher frequencies on the same 7 nm node.
Update 16:10 UTC: DirectX 12 Ultimate and DirectStorage support.
Update 16:11 UTC: Over 2X performance gain over RX 5700 XT.
Update 16:11 UTC: The RX 6800 XT!
Update 16:12 UTC: 4K Gaming from AMD is here! Matches RTX 3080!!!
Update 16:13 UTC: Hello competition!
Update 16:14 UTC: Welcome back ATI Rage, as the AMD Rage Mode.
Update 16:15 UTC: When paired with Ryzen, you get a gaming performance boost, 13% perf increase.

Update 16:15 UTC: AMD introduces its take on the NVIDIA Reflex, announcing latest Radeon Lag and Radeon Boost. No special API needed.
Update 16:16 UTC: Full DX12 Ultimate support, including ray-tracing. Woirking on a DLSS-rival.
Update 16:18 UTC: AMD is leveraging studios working on Xbox Series X / PS5 devs to integrate its Radeon features on the PC.

Update 16:18 UTC: FarCry 6, DiRT 5, WoW Shadowlands (which gets raytracing), RiftBreaker, are AMD-optimized.

Update 16:21 UTC: Available Nov 18, starts, $649

Update 16:21 UTC: Also announcing RX 6800 : faster than RTX 2080 Ti, 4K + raytracing ready
Update 16:22 UTC: $579, November 18 availability for the RX 6800.

Update 16:22 UTC: Lisa gets ready for a "one more thing"

Update 16:23 UTC: Radeon RX 6900 XT: 80 CUs, 65% perf/Watt over 5700 XT.
Update 16:25 UTC: RTX 3090 BEATEN!!!!
Update 16:26 UTC: December 8 for the RX 6900 XT, priced $999.
Update 16:26 UTC: OOF, we cannot wait to test these cards out!

Update 17:08 UTC: The press-release can be found here.

Update 17:19 UTC: The complete AMD slide deck follows.
Add your own comment

351 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 6000 "Big Navi" RDNA2 Graphics Card Launch Liveblog

#226
wolar
It was weird that 6800 released with 16gb ram and that high price tbh. Around 40$ less would be more appropriate and for that performance i would rather have 8gb and 100$ less.
Regardless of how much price reduction it would be, i think an 8gb 6800 makes more sense, and i would like to see a 10gb 6800xt matching the 3080 as well.
Posted on Reply
#227
okbuddy
ps5 36cu 2200mhz is exactly half 6800xt
$399
vs
$649
Posted on Reply
#228
randompeep
TheLostSwedeAMD's focus today is not on CPU or GPUs, it's on console SoCs. Want to buy a Ryzen 4000 mobile CPU from AMD today? If you're not Lenovo, HP, Dell or Asus, good luck, no stock as their allocation at TSMC is now being used up to make enough chips for Sony and Microsoft.
+1
Time will tell if they'll make enough console chips tho!! Taking in consideration the post-COVID growth on the gaming market and the continous rising on the computers' prices, I except some numbers on the gamepad side of things.
Posted on Reply
#230
RedelZaVedno
randompeepKeep it 4:1, keep it real. Do you think they're caring about people bragging on AMD 'fantastic' prices ? If Ryzen 3000 sells like pancakes currently at +10-20% over MSRP, how the GPU higher-tier marketing strategy would fail ?
We're talking about the next-gen, perf/$ can't be judged just yet. After AIB's get in stores, we could roll it up and down some more time. Till then both nvidia and AMD plan their position for these cheeky high-end and the supposed second hand market killer lineup @250-450$
Ryzen 3000 is much better value than intel, especially if you take the need for expensive Z490 MB and decent AMD cooler into account. How is paying $579 for xx70 GPU OK with ppl? I bought most of AMD mid to high GPUs simply because they were better value even when they were room heaters. I can't see value in $579 GPU anymore. It saddens me but I admit that if NVidia launches 3070TI with 12 or 16 gigs of ram for $599 I'll go with green option. Yes, "just" because it has DLSS and better ray tracing, worth paying 30 bucks more imho. I expected much more better value from AMD:(
Posted on Reply
#231
TheLostSwede
News Editor
okbuddyplus only 3 video ports, 3080 got five
Looks like four to me.



Posted on Reply
#232
Vayra86
TheLostSwedeLooks like four to me.

wtf they put RGB on the memory now? :eek:
Posted on Reply
#233
Rahnak
RedelZaVednoYes, "just" because it has DLSS and better ray tracing, worth paying 30 bucks more imho. I expected much more better value from AMD:(
AMD has their own competitor to DLSS. It's part of FidelityFX (therefore open) and it's called Super Resolution. It's also available to the consoles so the potential for wide usage is there. The better ray tracing is true, but nvidia is on their 2nd gen now, so I don't think anyone was expecting AMD to match that.
Posted on Reply
#234
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
RedelZaVednoRyzen 3000 is much better value than intel, especially if you take the need for expensive Z490 MB and decent AMD cooler into account. How is paying $579 for xx70 GPU OK with ppl? I bought most of AMD mid to high GPUs simply because they were better value even when they were room heaters. I can't see value in $579 GPU anymore. It saddens me but I admit that if NVidia launches 3070TI with 12 or 16 gigs of ram for $599 I'll go with green option. Yes, "just" because it has DLSS and better ray tracing, worth paying 30 bucks more imho. I expected much more better value from AMD:(
They are not going to release a RTX 3070 Ti at $599. That would be a stupid business decision when the 3070 is at $499 and the 3080 is at $699. Thats only a $100 difference between each tier and is still at the bottom high-performance segment which is not exactly where most of the money comes in.

RTX 2060 Super = $399
RTX 2070 Super = $599

RTX 2070 non-Super came out the year prior for the same $599 price (someone correct me if I'm wrong about this), so this wouldn't count
Posted on Reply
#235
Chomiq
okbuddy72/80=0.9

999-649 >>>>> 0.9

10% bump you need $350


plus only 3 video ports, 3080 got five
Some 30 series cards have 5 outputs, except you can still only connect 4 displays.
Posted on Reply
#236
RedelZaVedno
Vayra86Doubtful. We've already seen how tables can turn when it comes to these things. Intel's mindshare is quickly waning for example. It took Ryzen a few generations, you can expect similar with RDNA2. That's why I'm saying, you're probably going to be right, but don't mistake that for a lack of change in perspective. People need to ease into these things, and AMD has a lot of wiggle room here in terms of price that Nvidia really doesn't have. They will definitely be eating further into their margin than AMD this time around.

But the bigger issue is the mid-term to long-term market for Nvidia. Ampere was supposed to be their big overhaul right, I mean, this is FINALLY the Volta we always drooled over, really, all RT capable and everything with top 4K perf. So what's next for NV? How do you scale up a 320W board that is already out of balance in multiple ways? I mean its great they have GDDR6X. But they can't get a wider bus for it really without cutting on core power budget. What's their step up now?

AMD however is now in a position where Nvidia was during Pascal. Memory efficiency that is out of reach for its competitor. Boost that leaves a major gap with competitor. Feature parity with current day hardware and software. AMD can leverage technology that Nvidia simply doesn't have, nor can access easily. They've got a design win here and its ten times more impressive than Nvidia repurposing their cores for RT.

We find ourselves now, immediately after this presentation... considering what magic rabbit Huang has left in the hat. Because he needs one badly.

A hidden motivator though might the realization for customers that AMD Is also in the consoles for a while now. That is why the feature parity bit matters so much. If the GPUs can do the same things, show the same picture, why would you not switch? There is familiarity with both brands after all.

Fingers crossed now for no driver oopsies.
All Nvidia has to do is to transfer Ampere to TSMC 7nm euv process because going with Samsung 8nm (aka 10nm) was a shitshow. They'll probably do that in the next 18 months imo.
Posted on Reply
#237
Vya Domus
nguyenAMD really expect to sell those GPU at those prices ?
Does Nvidia expect to sell GPUs at even higher prices ? Let me guess, yes, because they were first by 2 months or some other made up nonsense. You know, AMD should pay people to buy their products probably, right ?

What a joke of a comment.
Posted on Reply
#238
randompeep
RedelZaVednoRyzen 3000 is much better value than intel, especially if you take the need for expensive Z490 MB and decent AMD cooler into account. How is paying $579 for xx70 GPU OK with ppl? I bought most of AMD mid to high GPUs simply because they were better value even when they were room heaters. I can't see value in $579 GPU anymore. It saddens me but I admit that if NVidia launches 3070TI with 12 or 16 gigs of ram for $599 I'll go with green option. Yes, "just" because it has DLSS and better ray tracing worth paying 30 bucks more :(
Honestly I don't see the need of DLSS just yet. I wanna game at 1080p - I got an 75 Hz IPS and the GPU power I need. I wanna play sth on TV @4k - i usually keep 9 ft between my eyes and the screen, so 1440p looks crisp asf in most of the titles. So I recommend and buy whatever gives the most performance per watt x perf per dollar at the time (inclining right or left, depending on the specific needs).
Trust me, AMD does indeed have a better value paired with a budget mobo (90%+ of the cases), but only if you're talking MSRPs. I'd say Intel got equal or better value for the 1080p gaming scenario with their no iGPU CPUs. Well, I'm pointing one more time at the older games or e-sports titles where O don't see as much of a difference between going ddr4 @2666 CL15-16 vs 3200/3600 CL16-18
Posted on Reply
#239
ratirt
RedelZaVednoAll Nvidia has to do is to transfer Ampere to TSMC 7nm euv process because going with Samsung 8nm (aka 10nm) was a shitshow. They'll probably do that in the next 18 months imo.
NV did it to cut price so if you want 7nm EUV prepare to pay more for any card NV has presented so far transfered to 7nm EUV.
Posted on Reply
#240
Sybaris_Caesar
krukThe clocks on the 6900 XT are suspiciously low, which suggests that we might be able to get a 6950 XT in the future as the production matures. This means that they can sell the new SKU at $999 and reduce the 6900 XT price to match the 3080 Ti ...
Production is already mature though. AMD skipped 5nm and all the ensuing supply war and stayed with mature (as of now) 7nm. I think opposite will happen. AMD keeps the best of the best Navi 21 dies for RX 6900 XT while relegating slow/not-so-best dies to RX 6900 to fight off RTX 3080 Ti.
Posted on Reply
#241
RedelZaVedno
CheeseballThey are not going to release a RTX 3070 Ti at $599. That would be a stupid business decision when the 3070 is at $499 and the 3080 is at $699. Thats only a $100 difference between each tier and is still at the bottom high-performance segment which is not exactly where most of the money comes in.

RTX 2060 Super = $399
RTX 2070 Super = $599

RTX 2070 non-Super came out the year prior for the same $599 price (someone correct me if I'm wrong about this), so this wouldn't count
My bet is 3070TI 12 gigs to match 6800 at $599 and 3080TI with 16 gigs to compete with 6900XT at $1099 in Q1 2021.
Posted on Reply
#242
ratirt
KhonjelProduction is already mature though. AMD skipped 5nm and all the ensuing supply war and stayed with mature (as of now) 7nm. I think opposite will happen. AMD keeps the best of the best Navi 21 dies for RX 6900 XT while relegating slow/not-so-best dies to RX 6900 to fight off RTX 3080 Ti.
I don't think they have skipped 5nm. They just stayed with 7nm. Maybe AMD didn't see a reason to go 5nm. From what we have seen so far, 7nm does the job. Why go 5nm and risk low yields and price increase.
Posted on Reply
#243
BoboOOZ
TheLostSwedeAMD's focus today is not on CPU or GPUs, it's on console SoCs. Want to buy a Ryzen 4000 mobile CPU from AMD today? If you're not Lenovo, HP, Dell or Asus, good luck, no stock as their allocation at TSMC is now being used up to make enough chips for Sony and Microsoft.
Just to point out the obvious, the number of wafers reauired for console APUs is huge, it' more than everything else they do (CPU or GPU alike).
Posted on Reply
#244
Crustybeaver
xkm1948Nice 6900. Finally a top of the line since Fury days!
Almost, the 980Ti was top of the line but it was better on the AMD optimised games.
Posted on Reply
#245
Super XP
I've said this before and I'll say it again, RDNA2 is the real deal. After the ZEN2 and now ZEN3 success, AMD pulled off RDNA2 and caught Nvidia by Surprise.
Posted on Reply
#246
Vayra86
RedelZaVednoAll Nvidia has to do is to transfer Ampere to TSMC 7nm euv process because going with Samsung 8nm (aka 10nm) was a shitshow. They'll probably do that in the next 18 months imo.
That still doesn't fix the memory part, only die size and power. So they'll go wider in bus.... and AMD can still get faster memory and bus. The best Nvidia's got in our current knowledge is a way to buy a generation worth of time. As we know from Intel's current position, that may very well not be enough.

Thinking of rabbits for Nvidia, I think their attempt to acquire ARM plays a role in that and if it does, time is not on their side.

One point that did stand out negatively for me... the price of the 6800 at 579. That doesn't look good against the 3070 at 500 even with the small performance advantage it seems to have.
Posted on Reply
#247
RedelZaVedno
ratirtNV did it to cut price so if you want 7nm EUV prepare to pay more for any card NV has presented so far transfered to 7nm EUV.
I agree on that, Ngreedia never gives anything for free unless it has to. But AMD has become the same greedy profit margin rising corp as Intel and NV. I'm seriously considering boycotting them both by buying GPUs only on 2nd hand market.
Posted on Reply
#248
randompeep
BoboOOZJust to point out the obvious, the number of wafers reauired for console APUs is huge, it' more than everything else they do (CPU or GPU alike).
Correct me if I'm wrong, but no way AMD would actually make comparable profit from the desktop GPUs as they do with the mobile Ryzens they've released the past years.
As some people say here and there, yeah the console SoC's is where the fat cash at
Posted on Reply
#249
Super XP
nguyenRasterizaton performance are good but AMD really expect to sell those GPU at those prices ? or perhaps they can't price them any lower ?
So its OK for Nvidia to rip people off with high prices but when AMD prices its GPUs at a fair value its too expensive for you? :roll:
RedelZaVednoI agree on that, Ngreedia never gives anything for free unless it has to. But AMD has become the same greedy profit margin rising corp as Intel and NV. I'm seriously considering boycotting them both by buying GPUs only on 2nd hand market.
I have to respectfully disagree with your comment labeling AMD as equally greedy as Nvidia and Intel. Quite the opposite actually, AMD obviously has to answer to its shareholders and is careful to produce reasonable margins. That is why, out of the 3 companies, AMD is well known to price its products fairly.
Posted on Reply
#250
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
lynx29i could care less about ray tracing. doesn't impress me at all in the games I have seen it in. i would rather turn it off and gain an extra 30-50 frames for the smoothness of high refresh gaming.
I wouldn't care about it at all in a competitive multiplayer game, but in a game that's single player with a good storyline. Id like to have Ray tracing.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 08:20 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts