Tuesday, November 10th 2020

Apple Announces the M1 Processor Powering Next-Gen Macs

Apple today announced M1, the most powerful chip it has ever created and the first chip designed specifically for the Mac. M1 is optimized for Mac systems in which small size and power efficiency are critically important. As a system on a chip (SoC), M1 combines numerous powerful technologies into a single chip, and features a unified memory architecture for dramatically improved performance and efficiency. M1 is the first personal computer chip built using cutting-edge 5-nanometer process technology and is packed with an astounding 16 billion transistors, the most Apple has ever put into a chip.

It features the world's fastest CPU core in low-power silicon, the world's best CPU performance per watt, the world's fastest integrated graphics in a personal computer, and breakthrough machine learning performance with the Apple Neural Engine. As a result, M1 delivers up to 3.5x faster CPU performance, up to 6x faster GPU performance, and up to 15x faster machine learning, all while enabling battery life up to 2x longer than previous-generation Macs. With its profound increase in performance and efficiency, M1 delivers the biggest leap ever for the Mac.
There has never been a chip like M1, our breakthrough SoC for the Mac. It builds on more than a decade of designing industry-leading chips for iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, and ushers in a whole new era for the Mac," said Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of Hardware Technologies. "When it comes to low-power silicon, M1 has the world's fastest CPU core, the world's fastest integrated graphics in a personal computer, and the amazing machine learning performance of the Apple Neural Engine. With its unique combination of remarkable performance, powerful features, and incredible efficiency, M1 is by far the best chip we've ever created."

First System on a Chip for the Mac
Macs and PCs have traditionally used multiple chips for the CPU, I/O, security, and more. Now with M1, these technologies are combined into a single SoC, delivering a whole new level of integration for greater performance and power efficiency. M1 also features a unified memory architecture that brings together high-bandwidth, low-latency memory into a single pool within a custom package. This allows all of the technologies in the SoC to access the same data without copying it between multiple pools of memory, further improving performance and efficiency.

The World's Best CPU Performance per Watt
M1 features an 8-core CPU consisting of four high-performance cores and four high-efficiency cores. Each of the high-performance cores provides industry-leading performance for single-threaded tasks, while running as efficiently as possible. They are the world's fastest CPU cores in low-power silicon, allowing photographers to edit high-resolution photos with lightning speed and developers to build apps nearly 3x faster than before. And all four can be used together for a huge boost in multithreaded performance.

The four high-efficiency cores deliver outstanding performance at a tenth of the power. By themselves, these four cores deliver similar performance as the current-generation, dual-core MacBook Air at much lower power. They are the most efficient way to run lightweight, everyday tasks like checking email or browsing the web, and preserve battery life like never before. And all eight cores can work together to provide incredible compute power for the most demanding tasks and deliver the world's best CPU performance per watt.

The World's Fastest Integrated Graphics
M1 includes Apple's most advanced GPU. It benefits from years of analysis of Mac applications, including everyday apps and challenging pro workloads. With industry-leading performance and incredible efficiency, the GPU in M1 is in a class by itself. Featuring up to eight powerful cores capable of running nearly 25,000 threads simultaneously, the GPU can handle extremely demanding tasks with ease, from smooth playback of multiple 4K video streams to rendering complex 3D scenes. With 2.6 teraflops of throughput, M1 has the world's fastest integrated graphics in a personal computer.

Blazing-Fast, On-Device Machine Learning
The M1 chip brings the Apple Neural Engine to the Mac, greatly accelerating machine learning (ML) tasks. Featuring Apple's most advanced 16-core architecture capable of 11 trillion operations per second, the Neural Engine in M1 enables up to 15x faster machine learning performance. In fact, the entire M1 chip is designed to excel at machine learning, with ML accelerators in the CPU and a powerful GPU, so tasks like video analysis, voice recognition, and image processing will have a level of performance never seen before on the Mac.

More Innovative Technologies Packed into M1
The M1 chip is packed with a number of powerful custom technologies, including:
  • Apple's latest image signal processor (ISP) for higher quality video with better noise reduction, greater dynamic range, and improved auto white balance.
  • The latest Secure Enclave for best-in-class security.
  • A high-performance storage controller with AES encryption hardware for faster and more secure SSD performance.
  • Low-power, highly efficient media encode and decode engines for great performance and extended battery life.
  • An Apple-designed Thunderbolt controller with support for USB 4, transfer speeds up to 40 Gbps, and compatibility with more peripherals than ever.
macOS Big Sur Optimized for M1
macOS Big Sur is engineered, down to its core, to take full advantage of all the capability and power of M1, delivering a massive boost in performance, astonishing battery life, and even stronger security protections. With M1, things users do every day feel noticeably faster and smoother. Just like iPhone and iPad, the Mac now instantly wakes from sleep. Browsing with Safari—which is already the world's fastest browser—is now up to 1.5x speedier at running JavaScript and nearly 2x more responsive.2

With Big Sur and M1, Mac users can run a greater range of apps than ever before. All of Apple's Mac software is now Universal and runs natively on M1 systems. Existing Mac apps that have not been updated to Universal will run seamlessly with Apple's Rosetta 2 technology. And iPhone and iPad apps can now run directly on the Mac. Additionally, the foundations of Big Sur are optimized to unlock the power of M1, including developer technologies from Metal for graphics to Core ML for machine learning.

Start of a Two-Year Transition for the Mac
M1 powers the new MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac mini. They join the rest of the Mac product line to form the strongest Mac lineup ever. This is the beginning of a transition to a new family of chips designed specifically for the Mac. The transition to Apple silicon will take about two years to complete, and these three systems are an amazing first step.
Add your own comment

44 Comments on Apple Announces the M1 Processor Powering Next-Gen Macs

#26
Searing
Excellent. I've bought a Mac Mini and am looking forward to testing the world's most advanced CPU.
Posted on Reply
#27
Steevo
dicktracyThe faster we move to ARM, the better. Just waiting for someone to do the same thing on the Windows side because Apple sure as hell ain't gonna sell their chips to anyone else.
ARM is only faster at the items it has the customer hardware for.
Posted on Reply
#28
TheoneandonlyMrK
zony249I agree its very asshole marketing , touting "more powerful than 98% of laptops... etc". That said, their claims of the fastest CPU cores and iGPU are not wrong... Last year Anandtech covered the A13 Bionic, and concluded that the A13 performance core was as fast as Skylake and zen2, albiet the latter are clocked much faster (~4.7 - 5 GHZ) vs 2.66 GHz from A13. This year A14 improves that by about ~20%, but is also facing Zen3 and Willow Cove with roughly 20 ~ 25% increases each. Do keep in mind that that is A14, not M1. M1 does not have the same thermal confines as A14, so higher clocks are possible.

In terms of iGPU, the M1 does NOT have the fastest iGPU... Those go to the Xbox Series X... That said, comparing to Intel Iris Xe MAX, it is roughly 3% faster in pixel and texture fill rate, and wipes the floor with vega 11. overall it is faster than an RX 560. (I compared the texture fill rates and pixel fill rates, using their claims of 82 GTexels/s and 41GPixels/s for comparison)

Overall, is it impressive? yes.
Am I disappointed in the marketing? YES!
Is it a game changer? We will leave it to the developers and see what they say.
Developer's, that's not the biggest user category, teenage girls , it'll be fine:p:D.
Posted on Reply
#29
Unregistered
How about Boot Camp, the only reason that makes MacBooks useful, the main problem of Macs is the OS, it's just inferior to Windows and has a lot of stupid limitations unlike Linux, lack of software support.
Performance claims against what on what, I'd love to see them running TPU's bench suite, issue is they can't. The issue is it depends on how you test, a Phenom is faster than an 8th gen i7 is some tests does it make faster in everything?
Posted on Edit | Reply
#30
windwhirl
Xex360How about Boot Camp, the only reason that makes MacBooks useful, the main problem of Macs is the OS, it's just inferior to Windows and has a lot of stupid limitations unlike Linux, lack of software support.
Performance claims against what on what, I'd love to see them running TPU's bench suite, issue is they can't. The issue is it depends on how you test, a Phenom is faster than an 8th gen i7 is some tests does it make faster in everything?
I'm not a Mac user, but I find hard to believe that Mac users would buy those devices just for Boot Camp. For one, I'm pretty sure that one of my clients that has a Mac doesn't use Windows in that system.

Besides, you should consider that Apple doesn't sell devices, they sell you the Mac experience.
Posted on Reply
#31
TechLurker
Idly speaking, it would be interesting to see what AMD could cook up on the ARM end of things, given they have a license and some experience with it even if they did shelve it to double-down on what would become Ryzen. They also are working with Samsung to better improve and integrate their RDNA tech into the mobile space, so AMD effectively has the CPU and GPU sides covered, should they need to dive into the ARMs Race for whatever reason. That being said, AMD's pursuit of efficiency and performance between their two internal Ryzen teams could see them never really needing to dive into ARM if they can continue pushing Ryzen into becoming the true scalable x86-64 design they said they were aiming for (tablets and ultra-thins all the way to enterprise/server).

Same goes for Intel to a lesser extent; they also have an ARM license, and are now getting into the GPU/accelerator competition, so they too could theoretically join the ARMs Race should they ever need to and have their own competitive SoC. The only real limiting factor seems to be fab and design inefficiencies in their case.

NVIDIA will be the green elephant in the room; they would likely want to compete in the ARM space and try to preempt AMD's RDNA compatibility with ARM-based devices and offer their own instead. Not to mention, maybe push ARM a bit more just to try and pull customers away from the two x86 license holders (3 if the rumors about VIA are true, and rejoining the x86 game).

At any rate, it'll be quite interesting to see what plays out in the long run. Tech has really become exciting again.
Posted on Reply
#32
Unregistered
windwhirlI'm not a Mac user, but I find hard to believe that Mac users would buy those devices just for Boot Camp. For one, I'm pretty sure that one of my clients that has a Mac doesn't use Windows in that system.

Besides, you should consider that Apple doesn't sell devices, they sell you the Mac experience.
The Mac experience is awful, I'm stuck with one of those overpriced MacBook "Pros", it's awful to work with with a lot of limitations and software issues, one thing though they have the best trackpad I've ever used, though you can use it on Windows with a custom driver and you get everything from Mac.
And both suffer from instability to similar way.
I do agree with you, Apple doesn't sell computers, but the whole experience, from you enter the store till you use on their products, they don't even push you to get the most expensive stuff if you don't need it.
While I maintain that Windows PCs are superior to Macs, the experience you get from Apple as a whole is way better than HP, Dell or DYI.
#33
Vya Domus
Xex360How about Boot Camp
That option is likely gone or has become unusable. The reason Apple can get away with x86 emulation within macos is because a lot of these apps make system calls which are actually native code but with boot camp the whole OS would have to go through an emulation layer which probably makes it horrendously slow.
Posted on Reply
#34
deu
Faster than what? (A tailored juridictional safety point of performance.)
Posted on Reply
#35
Fourstaff
So conflicted. On one hand, I am super excited to see how this chip performs against AMD/Intel offerings across a whole range of benchmarks. On the other hand, I am not the target audience. Should I give them a try?
Posted on Reply
#36
windwhirl
Xex360The Mac experience is awful, I'm stuck with one of those overpriced MacBook "Pros", it's awful to work with with a lot of limitations and software issues, one thing though they have the best trackpad I've ever used, though you can use it on Windows with a custom driver and you get everything from Mac.
And both suffer from instability to similar way.
I do agree with you, Apple doesn't sell computers, but the whole experience, from you enter the store till you use on their products, they don't even push you to get the most expensive stuff if you don't need it.
While I maintain that Windows PCs are superior to Macs, the experience you get from Apple as a whole is way better than HP, Dell or DYI.
I take it you use one because of work, not out of the joy of your heart. And if you come from Linux/Windows, then it probably takes quite a while to get used to macOS...
FourstaffSo conflicted. On one hand, I am super excited to see how this chip performs against AMD/Intel offerings across a whole range of benchmarks. On the other hand, I am not the target audience. Should I give them a try?
You just want one to have a field day benchmarking it, don't you? :laugh:

Seriously, though, I'd let the fervent followers of Apple go to town with it and wait for issues to show up and be solved through whatever hardware revision/upgrade may come next, if you're not a Mac user...
Posted on Reply
#37
Fourstaff
windwhirlYou just want one to have a field day benchmarking it, don't you? :laugh:

Seriously, though, I'd let the fervent followers of Apple go to town with it and wait for issues to show up and be solved through whatever hardware revision/upgrade may come next, if you're not a Mac user...
So sensible advice, unlike all the people foaming at the mouth.
Posted on Reply
#38
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
windwhirlSeriously, though, I'd let the fervent followers of Apple go to town with it and wait for issues to show up and be solved through whatever hardware revision/upgrade may come next, if you're not a Mac user...
I have a saying, "Never buy the first generation of a product." With that said though, I am tempted to get one of those new Mac Minis just to play around with it. Maybe I'll wait until some benchmarks come out.
Posted on Reply
#39
Unregistered
windwhirlI take it you use one because of work, not out of the joy of your heart. And if you come from Linux/Windows, then it probably takes quite a while to get used to macOS...

You just want one to have a field day benchmarking it, don't you? :laugh:

Seriously, though, I'd let the fervent followers of Apple go to town with it and wait for issues to show up and be solved through whatever hardware revision/upgrade may come next, if you're not a Mac user...
windwhirlI take it you use one because of work, not out of the joy of your heart. And if you come from Linux/Windows, then it probably takes quite a while to get used to macOS...

You just want one to have a field day benchmarking it, don't you? :laugh:

Seriously, though, I'd let the fervent followers of Apple go to town with it and wait for issues to show up and be solved through whatever hardware revision/upgrade may come next, if you're not a Mac user...
Exactly, I mainly use Windows, it is by no means perfect Microsoft tend to ruin perfect parts of their OS, but there is almost always a way around MD stupidity, MACOS is broken and you can't do anything about it.
Vya DomusThat option is likely gone or has become unusable. The reason Apple can get away with x86 emulation within macos is because a lot of these apps make system calls which are actually native code but with boot camp the whole OS would have to go through an emulation layer which probably makes it horrendously slow.
Running on x86 they could just let windows run natively, now they can't given that they have to emulate x86, which slow and filled with problems, so probably it's the end of boot camp.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#40
Zach_01
Am I wrong if I say that Windows already use RISC instructions on emulator?
Isn't RISC V going to be a thing, if not "the" thing of the future in computing?

And make sense to think that braking large CISC instructions into smaller RISC ones could make things more efficient. Making all chip(SOC) parts doing something and not wait for large chunks to be processed.
I think this can be the thing of future along with FPGAs...




What Xilinx? I never said anything about Xilinx....
Posted on Reply
#41
windwhirl
Zach_01Am I wrong if I say that Windows already use RISC instructions on emulator?
What emulator?
Zach_01Isn't RISC V going to be a thing, if not "the" thing of the future in computing?
RISC V has the advantage of being open source, but they still have to make something capable of matching ARM's IP. Besides, there are other factors that decide whether a ISA is successful or not.
Zach_01And make sense to think that braking large CISC instructions into smaller RISC ones could make things more efficient.
Last I heard, breaking down CISC into RISC instructions is already done in current x86 processors.
Zach_01Making all chip(SOC) parts doing something and not wait for large chunks to be processed.
That's why out-of-order execution, instruction pipelines, speculative execution and superscalar multi-core CPUs exist.
Posted on Reply
#42
pat-roner
xkm1948I mean the target audience just need to hear apple and they will automatically open their wallet up, so why would they need to back up their claim?
Just like you need to hear "Nvidia"?
theoneandonlymrkDeveloper's, that's not the biggest user category, teenage girls , it'll be fine:p:D.
You do realize the sheer amount of developers that use Macbooks right? Xcode only runs on MacOS.
Almost all of our developers/designers choose MacBooks when they start (Frontend, backend, Data Science, Android, iOS) as their personal machines.
Posted on Reply
#43
TheoneandonlyMrK
pat-ronerJust like you need to hear "Nvidia"?


You do realize the sheer amount of developers that use Macbooks right? Xcode only runs on MacOS.
Almost all of our developers/designers choose MacBooks when they start (Frontend, backend, Data Science, Android, iOS) as their personal machines.
You do realise that the majority of buyers still just watch Netflix on them.
Posted on Reply
#44
claes
You do realize that the same could be said of the Windows market :oops:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 01:48 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts