Tuesday, February 22nd 2022
Intel Arc Alchemist Graphics Card Lineup Detailed
SiSoftware put out the mother lode of information on Intel's upcoming Arc "Alchemist" gaming graphics card series, along with OpenCL compute performance of the entry-level Arc A380. The Arc series model numbering is "A" (Alchemist) followed by a number series. The A300 series makes up the entry-mainstream; the A500 series makes up the mid-performance segment; and the A700 series leads the pack with high-end SKUs. The "Alchemist" GPUs are built on the 7 nm silicon fabrication node at TSMC, the N7.
The A300 series is based on the smaller "Alchemist" series dies, with 128 EUs (execution units), which work out to 1,024 programmable shaders. The A500 series and A700 series appear to be carved out from the larger silicon. The A500 series has roughly 384 EU or 3,072 shaders. The top-dog A700 series has all 512 EU or 4,096 shaders enabled. Intel is tapping into industry-standard GDDR6 for dedicated graphics memory. The A300-series SKUs typically have 6 GB of 14 Gbps-rated memory across a 96-bit wide memory bus, for 192 GB/s of bandwidth. The A500 series parts have 12 GB of 16 Gbps-rated memory across a 192-bit bus, for 384 GB/s of bandwidth. The top A700 series maxes out the 256-bit memory bus with 16 GB of memory at 16 Gbps data-rate, for 512 GB/s bandwidth.
Several other interesting features were revealed. Firstly, "Alchemist" supports real-time ray tracing, and meets the full DirectX 12 Ultimate specification. At this point it's not known just how much fixed-function hardware is used to achieve this. The GPU has XMX (hardware for matrix-multiplication). A note on the SIMD components: Xe HPG, or "Alchemist," lacks double-precision floating-point (FP64) acceleration. It only supports FP16 and FP32 (which is all you need for gaming and consumer apps).
SiSoftware tested an entry-level Arc A380 graphics card (1,024 shaders) through its SANDRA GPGPU benchmark that uses native OpenCL code. Here, the A380 was found to be offering performance comparable to a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti "Turing," and hot on the heels of the RTX 3050 "Ampere" and RX 6500 XT RDNA2, in the Mandelbrot half-precision and floating-point tests.
Intel is looking to debut the Arc Alchemist series within the first half of 2022.
Source:
SiSoft
The A300 series is based on the smaller "Alchemist" series dies, with 128 EUs (execution units), which work out to 1,024 programmable shaders. The A500 series and A700 series appear to be carved out from the larger silicon. The A500 series has roughly 384 EU or 3,072 shaders. The top-dog A700 series has all 512 EU or 4,096 shaders enabled. Intel is tapping into industry-standard GDDR6 for dedicated graphics memory. The A300-series SKUs typically have 6 GB of 14 Gbps-rated memory across a 96-bit wide memory bus, for 192 GB/s of bandwidth. The A500 series parts have 12 GB of 16 Gbps-rated memory across a 192-bit bus, for 384 GB/s of bandwidth. The top A700 series maxes out the 256-bit memory bus with 16 GB of memory at 16 Gbps data-rate, for 512 GB/s bandwidth.
SiSoftware tested an entry-level Arc A380 graphics card (1,024 shaders) through its SANDRA GPGPU benchmark that uses native OpenCL code. Here, the A380 was found to be offering performance comparable to a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti "Turing," and hot on the heels of the RTX 3050 "Ampere" and RX 6500 XT RDNA2, in the Mandelbrot half-precision and floating-point tests.
Intel is looking to debut the Arc Alchemist series within the first half of 2022.
37 Comments on Intel Arc Alchemist Graphics Card Lineup Detailed
Crack on G who just said vapour ware is vapourware, correctly.
Or you two making the us v them point so un-eloquently.
Bring it Intel , show the world, asap.
Which.... is actually fine, as long as priced appropriately.
Crap driver at launch might even translate to Intel ''FineWine'' technology, might not be a bad idea to keep it in system for longer time, as long as those intial driver issue aren't completely crippling. If I were Intel, stability >>> performance for these driver, you are new player in market, better play it conservatively.
Those two picked to defend ,as you are though you at least made a reasonable, eloquent argument.
Benches mean little until W1zard or a tpu user posts theirs IMHO.
I want Intel to come through and show us what they can do and I don't know why so many people are for them failing. I'm hopeful that they'll find a way to be competitive with Nvidia and AMD, even if it's a generation or two down the road that they get to that point.
I don't know why people are so fast to bash Intel on this, it's almost as if they just want Intel to instantly fail because they're scared they might make waves or they just don't like them or for whatever other reason they may have. I'm excited to see what they bring, even if I'm not looking for a new GPU myself.
That's the point.
I gave examples of vapour and my definition, no stock on shelves.
You can argue as you wish and defend what you want but this hype train still hasn't pulled into the station.
And a list of already gleaned info doesn't change that.
Naive, whatever , explain how.
They backed out of releasing Dg1 to public ,Dg2 is nowhere to be seen in public ,naive, nahh.
In the all-important floating point metric for real-time 3D graphics, the A380 is barely half the speed of a 3050 and significantly slower than a 1660Ti. This is a 1650 competitor, based on that one, almost irrelevant metric.
Do SISoft have an actual A380 or are they just making up silly charts based on Raja's optimistic twitter feed?
Even though Intel had resizable bar option that worked poorly with amd and nvidia, perhaps ARC gpus can do better this time
I just hope Madmartigan ( Raj ) learn his lesson about driver performance from his time at AMD. Doubtful.