Tuesday, April 12th 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Gets Full Set of Gaming Benchmarks Ahead of Launch
XanxoGaming has finally released its complete set of benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and it's been tested against an Intel Core i9-12900KF. This time both platforms are tested using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and four times 8 GB of 3200 MHz CL14 DDR4 memory. The only difference appears to be the OS drive, motherboard and cooling, although both systems rely on a 360 mm AIO cooler. Both systems were running Windows 10 21H2. The site has a full breakdown of the components used for those interested in the exact details.
The two platforms were tested in 11 different games at 720p and 1080p. To spoil the excitement, it's a dead race between the two CPUs in most games at 1080p, with Intel being ahead by about 1-3 FPS in the games where AMD loses out. However, in the games AMD takes the lead, it's by a good 10 FPS or more, with games like the Witcher 3 and Final Fantasy XV seeing an advantage of 40-50 FPS. AMD often has an advantage when it comes to the one percent low numbers, even when Intel is ahead when it comes to the average FPS, but this doesn't apply to all of the games. It's worth keeping in mind that the Intel CPU should gain extra performance when paired with DDR5 memory in some of these games, but we'll have to wait for more reviews to see by how much. The benchmarks displayed are mostly the games TPU normally tests with, but aren't the entirety of games tested by XanxoGaming.
As for the 720p tests, AMD only loses out in Strange Brigade, even though it's a loss of over 20 FPS on average FPS and by over 10 FPS when it comes to the one percent low frames. As for the other games, it's mostly a dead race here too, but with an advantage to AMD instead of Intel by 1-3 FPS. However, the 3D V-Cache seems to kick in here when it comes to the one percent low frames, as AMD edges out Intel by a large margin in more games here by at least 10 FPS, often by around 30 FPS or more. Take these benchmarks for what they are, an early, unconfirmed test of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. We're just over a week away from the launch and we should be seeing a lot more benchmarks by then. Head over to XanxoGaming for the full set of tests and their conclusion, especially as they made an effort to write the test in English this time around.
Source:
XanxoGaming
The two platforms were tested in 11 different games at 720p and 1080p. To spoil the excitement, it's a dead race between the two CPUs in most games at 1080p, with Intel being ahead by about 1-3 FPS in the games where AMD loses out. However, in the games AMD takes the lead, it's by a good 10 FPS or more, with games like the Witcher 3 and Final Fantasy XV seeing an advantage of 40-50 FPS. AMD often has an advantage when it comes to the one percent low numbers, even when Intel is ahead when it comes to the average FPS, but this doesn't apply to all of the games. It's worth keeping in mind that the Intel CPU should gain extra performance when paired with DDR5 memory in some of these games, but we'll have to wait for more reviews to see by how much. The benchmarks displayed are mostly the games TPU normally tests with, but aren't the entirety of games tested by XanxoGaming.
139 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Gets Full Set of Gaming Benchmarks Ahead of Launch
Just a few days more and we will see.
12900KS was not tested with ful potential here. Lets see more of this now, where this can lead us conclude.
My main rig I'll still update from a 5950X I think with AMD/Intel's next parts if they are any g ood.
For example, you will have higher 2160p performance if you couple the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with Radeon RX 7900 XT than if you have Core i9-12900K with Radeon RX 7900 XT..
Also did you look at the lows? The 5800X3D even when tied @ 1080p often had better lows by 10% or more.
The X3D is more then the 12700F but B550 is less than B660 for a good board and if you go DDR4 for both the ram is the same. Overall cost difference is maybe 15% more for the X3D build and in some games it will win by more than that so if the buyer plays those games it could be worth while. More of a tossup though than the existing AM4 owner, especially an AM4 owner who is on a 1xxxx/2xxx series part.
This is more like a beta-test or showcase of a future technology which may or may not be implemented in any future products.
I think this kind of cache capacity upgrade needs at least the new N3 TSMC process node, so it will take smaller part of the die availability.