Tuesday, April 12th 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Gets Full Set of Gaming Benchmarks Ahead of Launch
XanxoGaming has finally released its complete set of benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and it's been tested against an Intel Core i9-12900KF. This time both platforms are tested using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and four times 8 GB of 3200 MHz CL14 DDR4 memory. The only difference appears to be the OS drive, motherboard and cooling, although both systems rely on a 360 mm AIO cooler. Both systems were running Windows 10 21H2. The site has a full breakdown of the components used for those interested in the exact details.
The two platforms were tested in 11 different games at 720p and 1080p. To spoil the excitement, it's a dead race between the two CPUs in most games at 1080p, with Intel being ahead by about 1-3 FPS in the games where AMD loses out. However, in the games AMD takes the lead, it's by a good 10 FPS or more, with games like the Witcher 3 and Final Fantasy XV seeing an advantage of 40-50 FPS. AMD often has an advantage when it comes to the one percent low numbers, even when Intel is ahead when it comes to the average FPS, but this doesn't apply to all of the games. It's worth keeping in mind that the Intel CPU should gain extra performance when paired with DDR5 memory in some of these games, but we'll have to wait for more reviews to see by how much. The benchmarks displayed are mostly the games TPU normally tests with, but aren't the entirety of games tested by XanxoGaming.
As for the 720p tests, AMD only loses out in Strange Brigade, even though it's a loss of over 20 FPS on average FPS and by over 10 FPS when it comes to the one percent low frames. As for the other games, it's mostly a dead race here too, but with an advantage to AMD instead of Intel by 1-3 FPS. However, the 3D V-Cache seems to kick in here when it comes to the one percent low frames, as AMD edges out Intel by a large margin in more games here by at least 10 FPS, often by around 30 FPS or more. Take these benchmarks for what they are, an early, unconfirmed test of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. We're just over a week away from the launch and we should be seeing a lot more benchmarks by then. Head over to XanxoGaming for the full set of tests and their conclusion, especially as they made an effort to write the test in English this time around.
Source:
XanxoGaming
The two platforms were tested in 11 different games at 720p and 1080p. To spoil the excitement, it's a dead race between the two CPUs in most games at 1080p, with Intel being ahead by about 1-3 FPS in the games where AMD loses out. However, in the games AMD takes the lead, it's by a good 10 FPS or more, with games like the Witcher 3 and Final Fantasy XV seeing an advantage of 40-50 FPS. AMD often has an advantage when it comes to the one percent low numbers, even when Intel is ahead when it comes to the average FPS, but this doesn't apply to all of the games. It's worth keeping in mind that the Intel CPU should gain extra performance when paired with DDR5 memory in some of these games, but we'll have to wait for more reviews to see by how much. The benchmarks displayed are mostly the games TPU normally tests with, but aren't the entirety of games tested by XanxoGaming.
139 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Gets Full Set of Gaming Benchmarks Ahead of Launch
In any case, I feel this is a stopgap solution from AMD, which is not worth buying unless AMD brings the price down further. With Zen 4 on the horizon and 3D cache baked into it, I don’t see any reason to get too excited over it. It is faster in games than the existing Zen 3 chips, but only in selected games and applications.
Nobody really cares if they're getting 200 or 300fps average but in a busy firefight the minute it drops below vsync or whatever tickrate the engine/server runs at you'll notice it and want to drop quality settings.
if its not a joke, its about cpu limited benchmarks to show what the cpu contributes, if it was a 4k then the top 7 cpu's out there all preform the same as its GPU limited.
I keep wondering what else AMD can stack on top of the CPU... iGPUs ? Ram ? Asics dedicated to AI or RT ? It will be very interesting to find out.
www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-future-cpus-could-feature-direct-attached-accelerators
About time something does not die with a release for Intel customers.
Look at 3100 vs 3300X at 4.0GHz fixed. The major difference is that 3300X has access to double cache vs 3100 that must share it between ccx-es.
This is also why the new low-end AMD CPUs are bad.