Friday, July 22nd 2022
Intel Core i7-13700K Raptor Lake-S CPU Runs Geekbench
With Intel Raptor Lake-S desktop processors around the corner, we see an ever-increasing number of entries to the popular synthetic benchmark databases. Yesterday we had an Intel Core i5-3600K CPU, while today, we are presented with Core i7-13700K SKU. The new 13th generation Core i7-13700K CPU features eight P-cores and eight E-cores. Compared to the 12th generation Core i7-12700K, this is a step up with eight P-cores and four E-cores. According to Geekbench 5 benchmark, the new Qualification Sample (QS) of Core i7-13700K CPU was running at the minimum clock of 5.289 GHz, maximum clock of 5.381 GHz, and average speed of 5.36 GHz. It was tested on the same configuration as yesterday's i5 SKU with ASRock Z690 Steel Legend WiFi 6E motherboard with 32 GB of DDR4 memory.
As far as the results are concerned, the 13th gen i7-13700K SKU scored 2090 points in the single-core test, while the multi-core score totaled 16542 points. If we compare this to the 12th gen i7-12700K CPU that it replaces, the new model leads by about 10% and 17% in single-core and multi-core tests, respectively.
Source:
via VideoCardz
As far as the results are concerned, the 13th gen i7-13700K SKU scored 2090 points in the single-core test, while the multi-core score totaled 16542 points. If we compare this to the 12th gen i7-12700K CPU that it replaces, the new model leads by about 10% and 17% in single-core and multi-core tests, respectively.
43 Comments on Intel Core i7-13700K Raptor Lake-S CPU Runs Geekbench
But i know i've said you need to stop preaching about its low power consumption and power efficiency, because your personal results are only applicable to people running a 2022 CPU with a 2016 GPU
It's only cold and efficient because you're GPU limited, but you keep acting like it's going to behave that way for *everyone* - and it doesnt.
No one is saying you're not happy with it or allowed to be happy with it, but you're also using it in a fairly uncommon way - with a 5 year old GPU
A 1660 with DLSS enabled is going to make that CPU run harder than you push it
The user said that even a d15 or a 280aio thermal throttles, so even if the u12a is on that level (which it isn't), that's absolutely false.
I ran 10minutes but doesn't make a difference, aircoolers have small thermal capacity - they tend to hit their maximum temperatures after around 1 - 1.5 minute. Of course that's assuming you have enough airflow. It's watercoolers that need 20 minutes of testing to thermal soak.
A tire up, 11 gen later and all the new elaboratet power boost manegments for ~80W bump is not that drastic to me.
With a new, well ventilated, case and new CPU cooler that advanced alot in the past ~12 years I will have no problem keep temp in check.
Id really love to see a zen 3 at 25w in farcry 6 pushing a 3090, but we know nobody will date test it
some coolers perform super well at lower wattages but fall behind at higher, which makes this sort of comparison a total mess
These CPUs are also not made for anything specific. They are not ASICs.
Also Intel has spent billions of dollars of advertisement in over 20 years to ingrained their customers on the Increase speed (mhz) = better performance.
What I think is going to happen is back to the Tic' Tok' small increases of performance every year/generation like before. So the Cache might be a little larger every generation in order to not to cannibalize previous generations sales of components that is still in stock.
Just enough to be better than before. But that's all I think it will be. However if it is easier to just increase the mhz to achieve similar results than adding additional cache, they will do so in order to save money
Or do a combination of the two concepts.