Friday, September 9th 2022
Core Performance Boost Contributes 14% to Ryzen 5 7600X Cinebench R23 Score
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X "Zen 4" 6-core/12-thread processor is shaping up to be a speed-demon for purely gaming builds, with the company claiming higher gaming performance than Intel current flagship Core i9-12900K. A combination of high clock speeds (4.70 GHz nominal, 5.30 GHz max boost), high power limits from 105 W TDP (130 W limit), the "Zen 4" IPC, and the fact that all that power headroom is available to just 6 cores, means that the chip is able to sustain boost frequencies better. But what when Core Performance Boost (CPB) is disabled? VideoCardz scored screenshots of a Cinebench R23 run to answer just that.
With CPB disabled (in the motherboard BIOS), the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 1681 points in the single-threaded test, and 13003 points in the multi-threaded one. With CPB enabled (which is the default setting), the 7600X bags 1920 points single-threaded, and 14767 points multi-threaded, which is a 14% performance increase just from the processor's boosting algo. Disabling CPB is generally seen as a silver-bullet against high temperatures for AMD processors, and even here, we see the chip running under 60°C, and pulling 60.2 W peak, as measured by HWinfo; whereas with CPB enabled, the chip can run as hot as 92.1°C, pulling up to 110 W, pushing clock speeds up to 4.45 GHz.
Source:
VideoCardz
With CPB disabled (in the motherboard BIOS), the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 1681 points in the single-threaded test, and 13003 points in the multi-threaded one. With CPB enabled (which is the default setting), the 7600X bags 1920 points single-threaded, and 14767 points multi-threaded, which is a 14% performance increase just from the processor's boosting algo. Disabling CPB is generally seen as a silver-bullet against high temperatures for AMD processors, and even here, we see the chip running under 60°C, and pulling 60.2 W peak, as measured by HWinfo; whereas with CPB enabled, the chip can run as hot as 92.1°C, pulling up to 110 W, pushing clock speeds up to 4.45 GHz.
116 Comments on Core Performance Boost Contributes 14% to Ryzen 5 7600X Cinebench R23 Score
10 W per core, 2166 points per 10 W
""""you can easily identify by seeing your behaviour of computer whether your CPU is heating or not
1. You are CPU fan rotating very fastly that can create louder noise than usual.
2. Your computer process becomes slow.
3. Some hanging like problem
4. Automatically shut down (this is the most common one when CPU get overheated).
Sometime the CPU get burn if it will overheated.
Caution!!!!
If this kind of problem occur chances that you have to contact computer technician. Before you fixing that kind of problem. Because overheating of cpus can burn your cabinet with motherboard.""""
What happens when the CPU temperature is too high? - Quora
TLDR: My R5 3600 got to throttling temperature at around 80 W while my Core i7 11700 was happy at 120-130 W with the same cooler, in the same chassis. Power consumption and heat dissipation are two entirely different things. And again: I'm not worried about power consumption here. I'm worried about heat dissipation. Why is this so hard to understand?
If u have a tiny/small system, just limit cpu power to 90W, it wont effect single core performance, only cut some multicore performance.
ZEN4 have a very samll size core area (a thing AMD is very proud of) so it might be harder to cool.
The same W concentrated to a smaller area so a greater heat is generated.
Dealing with the same 110W (or any other W value) can differ greatly, no matter the cooling solution (as long it is the same)
ALS-S @ 5.2 6/4 ecore - the 13600K should easily stomp on this score - if it's priced around the 7600x it's going to be a huge difference (in this benchmark).
92C is bush league compared what ADL-S hits in cinebench lol.
or go for two CCX cpu, where power will spread between two CCX, if u want 120W so much.
1. You dissipate heat (energy). The number of watt the CPU use is the amount of watt you have to remove from your cpu and your case. No matter what is the running temperature of your CPU, if one use 50 watt and the other 250 w, you should output 5 time more heat in the second case.
After that, depending on your cooling solution, on how the cpu is build etc, how the case is ventilated, what is the ambiant temperature, the fan curve of the cooler, the type of cooler, it's quite possible that the 250 watt end up operating at a lower temperature than the 50 watt cpu. But it will still output 5 time more heat in your case and in your room. If you want to build a SSF, it's the output heat that matter, not as much as temperature.
But having super high temperature at low wattage is not that great either. It add stress to component each thermal cycles, and yes you might boost slightly lower. That lead to my second point.
2. There are 2 types of CPU Throttling.
- The CPU reduce it's operating frequency bellow it's base for few moment to cool itself.
- The CPU generate empty cycle (0) but keep it's frequency. In this case clock might remain high but performance will suffer. (But generally less drastically than by reducing clock under base frequency.
If a CPU have a base of 3.4 GHz and just boost to 3.8 instead of 4.2 GHz, it's not throttling. It's just not boosting as high because of thermal. The boosting in a CPU is there to extract as much performance as possible from it's environment.
In the end, the results is the same as throttling under the base frequency, but you still get way more performance and above what is the base guarantee. So you are in spec.
They might be thermally limited on performance with this node if they're limited to 100W.
The amount of people using cinebench as a guage and don't render at all is hilarious. I know there is a lack of information out until the reviews but since when did CPU Z, CB and GB become the standard at which we rate cpu performance.