Monday, September 12th 2022

Intel Core i7-13700T 35W Chip Matches 125W i5-12600K

As with every generation before it, Intel is preparing a line of 13th Gen Core processors with 35 W processor base power under the "T" brand extension. The Core i7-13700T retains the core-configuration of the i7-13700K (8P+8E), but with a much more aggressive power-management for commercial-desktop applications. Geekbench 5.4.5 scores of the processor were leaked to the web, where the processor was shown matching or beating the Core i5-12600K, a previous-generation 6P+4E core processor with much higher boost frequencies, and power limits.

The Core i7-13700T comes with nominal clock speeds of just 1.40 GHz, compared to 3.40 GHz of the i7-13700K, while its P-core maximum boost is probably 4.90 GHz, compared to 5.40 GHz of its enthusiastic sibling. The maximum boost frequency difference between the two SKUs may not seem like much, but the tighter power limits mean that the i7-13700T will hold on to boost frequencies in much smaller bursts. The chip is shown scoring 1939 points in the single-threaded test, and 11564 points in the multi-threaded one. In the ST test, the chip has sufficient power budget to boost one P-core to its maximum frequency, and so it's beating the i5-12600K with its 1856 ST score. In the multi-threaded test, it's slightly worse than the 11608 points of the i5-12600K. While it has more cores, there simply isn't enough power budget to run them at high frequencies. The Core i7-13700T likely won't be part of the first wave of 13th Gen Core SKUs, and will probably launch by late-2022 or early-2023.
Sources: BenchLeaks (Twitter), VideoCardz
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Intel Core i7-13700T 35W Chip Matches 125W i5-12600K

#1
ModEl4
At what PL2? (12700T had 99W)
Posted on Reply
#3
JustBenching
So its going to be the most efficient cpu on planet earth. Good
Posted on Reply
#4
Denver
Crackong35W...

I agree. Against tests there are no arguments.
Posted on Reply
#5
ratirt
Hehe :) it's like comparing 5800H to 5600x :P
Also no PL1 and PL2 power showed. PL1 can be 35w and PL2 125w for fun :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#6
napata
A stock 12600k is 150W.
Posted on Reply
#7
dyonoctis
It's certainly consuming a lot less power than the stock 13700k at least. The MT score is nearly halved

Posted on Reply
#8
zlobby
Crackong35W...

Anyone remembers their phase chiller in another expo, while claiming it was air-cooled?
Posted on Reply
#9
watzupken
This comparison is meaningless when we all know that the PL2 power draw is nowhere near 35W. 35W generally points to the base clock speed. At that sub 2Ghz clock, it’s not going to break any records.
Posted on Reply
#10
zlobby
watzupkenThis comparison is meaningless when we all know that the PL2 power draw is nowhere near 35W. 35W generally points to the base clock speed. At that sub 2Ghz clock, it’s not going to break any records.
But it sure attracts customers.
Posted on Reply
#11
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
Only relevant if it achieves that while locked at 35W the entire time, otherwise its bullshit marketing making something out of nothing since most laptops will lock it down (or it'll boost only for long enough to benefit office workers)
zlobbyAnyone remembers their phase chiller in another expo, while claiming it was air-cooled?
My custom loop is air cooled!

Even LN2 is air cooled, since the LN2 needs to evaporate into the air
Posted on Reply
#12
Jimmy_
Crackong35W...

Agreed.... doesnt seem legitimate to me too
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 20th, 2024 11:28 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts