Friday, December 9th 2022

Gigabyte's and Sapphire's Radeon RX 7900-series Cards Pictured

Courtesy of VideoCardz, we now know what Gigabyte's and Sapphire's upcoming Radeon RX 7900-series cards will look like. Gigabyte will offer at least two different custom designed models, with the Aorus Elite being the higher-end one and the Gaming OC being the mainstream one. Both appear to come in RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT SKUs. The Aorus Elite is said to be a 3.5-slot card sporting three 8-pin power connectors, whereas the Gaming OC is a 2.5-slot card with two 8-pin power connectors.

The Sapphire card in question is the Nitro+ which has been given a design overhaul compared to the Radeon RX 6000-series cards and it's quite a bright card thanks to its silver coloured shroud. We're once again looking at a massive cooler here, which is wider than three slots, but maybe not quite 3.5-slots wide. Unsurprisingly, Sapphire has kitted out the card with three 8-pin power connectors. None of the three cards have a USB-C port and it appears that those looking to get an AMD Radeon RX 7900-series card with a USB-C port, would have to go for the reference design cards.
Sources: VideoCardz (Gigabyte), VideoCardz (Sapphire)
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Gigabyte's and Sapphire's Radeon RX 7900-series Cards Pictured

#1
Denver
Why spoil AMD's marketing of the "relatively compact design that fits in any case" with this brick? lol
Posted on Reply
#2
zo0lykas
hmm 7900xtx elite 3.5 slots so what they will do with 7950xt or 7990xt models? just include a bucket with ice?
Posted on Reply
#3
LFaWolf
That card in the bottom picture really looks like a brick.
Posted on Reply
#4
TheLostSwede
News Editor
LFaWolfThat card in the bottom picture really looks like a brick.
The Aorus Elite is supposedly slightly fatter. None of the XTX's are exactly petit.
Posted on Reply
#5
ZoneDymo
eh, boring, boring, and way too big
Posted on Reply
#6
kapone32
Why do AIBs think that we need these super huge GPUs. At this point I will be weighing the difference between the cost of a reference card with a waterblock vs the As Rock Aqua. I am really disappointed in Sapphire.
Posted on Reply
#7
claes
Why did sapphire put the RGB on the slot side?
Posted on Reply
#8
Darmok N Jalad
Hey, at least one finally showed up as a 2 8-pin model. All these 3 plug behemoths, what are they offering in terms of performance gains over the reference design? Either they get a ton of liberty with power and clocks, or it’s just a “size matters” marketing push.
claesWhy did sapphire put the RGB on the slot side?
Maybe to bounce light off the motherboard? Might not be a bad idea since the card is so damn massive that it could be the RGB equivalent of a solar eclipse?
Posted on Reply
#9
Dave65
I will go for the reference design myself, these are way to big but the Sapphire does look sharp imo.
Posted on Reply
#10
Gmr_Chick
I'd kill to see that Sapphire card in person. You can bet that since it's a Sapphire card, it'll be as cool as a cucumber, too.
Posted on Reply
#11
xtreemchaos
id like to see Sapphire do one with a water block, it would look less bricky.
Posted on Reply
#12
Dammeron
claesWhy did sapphire put the RGB on the slot side?
Thought the same as soon as I saw it.
Darmok N JaladMaybe to bounce light off the motherboard? Might not be a bad idea since the card is so damn massive that it could be the RGB equivalent of a solar eclipse?
Should've seen the RGB on Zotac Trinity - set on 10% brightness and still overpowering everything else...
Posted on Reply
#13
ARF
claesWhy did sapphire put the RGB on the slot side?
Psychopathic illness which needs treatment in the hospital.

This generation is uber fail so far.
1. RTX 4090 - enormous and super expensive, melting, fire hazard
2. RTX 4080 - enormous and super expensive
3. RTX 4080 2 - rebadged and super expensive, not released yet, relatively slow
4. RX 7900 XTX - enormous and super expensive, stupid design decisions
5. RX 7900 XT - same as above
6. Lower tier cards nowhere in sight.
Posted on Reply
#14
AdmiralThrawn
ARFPsychopathic illness which needs treatment in the hospital.

This generation is uber fail so far.
1. RTX 4090 - enormous and super expensive, melting, fire hazard
2. RTX 4080 - enormous and super expensive
3. RTX 4080 2 - rebadged and super expensive, not released yet, relatively slow
4. RX 7900 XTX - enormous and super expensive, stupid design decisions
5. RX 7900 XT - same as above
6. Lower tier cards nowhere in sight.
The RTX 4060 is slotted for early July of 2023. Why? because F you that's why.

On top of that NVIDIA just retired their 2 best selling cards of all time the 2060 and 1660. But because they hate you they are not replacing them with new cards.

From the perspective of a computer hardware salesman this is incredibly frustrating.
Posted on Reply
#15
Darmok N Jalad
ARFPsychopathic illness which needs treatment in the hospital.

This generation is uber fail so far.
1. RTX 4090 - enormous and super expensive, melting, fire hazard
2. RTX 4080 - enormous and super expensive
3. RTX 4080 2 - rebadged and super expensive, not released yet, relatively slow
4. RX 7900 XTX - enormous and super expensive, stupid design decisions
5. RX 7900 XT - same as above
6. Lower tier cards nowhere in sight.
Reference designs for the 7900 are in the realm of normal size. Price is another consideration, and both are way more than I’ll pay anyway. Most I ever paid for a GPU was $300.
Posted on Reply
#16
Dammeron
ARF1. RTX 4090 - enormous and super expensive, melting, fire hazard
Remove that one, since those were mostly proven user errors and the whole problem was minor in numbers. Let's not spread misinformation.

RTX 4080 would also suffer from same infamy, if not for the fact that nobody wants to buy those... :P
Posted on Reply
#17
Denver
ARFPsychopathic illness which needs treatment in the hospital.

This generation is uber fail so far.
1. RTX 4090 - enormous and super expensive, melting, fire hazard
2. RTX 4080 - enormous and super expensive
3. RTX 4080 2 - rebadged and super expensive, not released yet, relatively slow
4. RX 7900 XTX - enormous and super expensive, stupid design decisions
5. RX 7900 XT - same as above
6. Lower tier cards nowhere in sight.
What are you talking about? AMD's cards are perfectly priced, of course on the consumer side, most will want something even cheaper or even free.

But the reality is that hardware in general will be more expensive, among other things because the curve between increasing density of newer manufacturing process and production and development costs are out of sync. Putting it on paper and being optimistic the production cost of the XTX should be somewhere between $600-700, the memory alone should cost more than $300. I will not go into the question of long term support via software (drivers) and development.
So...realistically it is an excellent price
Posted on Reply
#18
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
DenverWhy spoil AMD's marketing of the "relatively compact design that fits in any case" with this brick? lol
7900XT aint.
Posted on Reply
#19
1d10t


Another moronic design, 3.5 slot and RGB strips in underside of the cards. I mean like, how you gonna see it? If it two sides then yeah you definitely see partially.
Posted on Reply
#20
john_
AdmiralThrawnThe RTX 4060 is slotted for early July of 2023. Why? because F you that's why.
And when it arrives, it will be offering about the same performance/$ as the 3060. High performance difference will exist only artificially when using DLSS 3.0 for example.
Posted on Reply
#21
Chrispy_
AdmiralThrawnThe RTX 4060 is slotted for early July of 2023. Why? because F you that's why.

On top of that NVIDIA just retired their 2 best selling cards of all time the 2060 and 1660. But because they hate you they are not replacing them with new cards.

From the perspective of a computer hardware salesman this is incredibly frustrating.
Yep. It's times like these that I'm pleased I have access to CEX who will effectively slap 20% on the market value of used GPUs and give you a 2 year warranty.

I don't like it, but we're going to go through an artificial drought of mainstream GPUs again unless AMD and Intel can fill in the gap, soon.
Posted on Reply
#22
jesdals
Being a 3 monitor user I simply cant understand why they do 2+2, but damn these cards are bulky.

The Elite has some nice gains
Boost Clock* : up to 2680 MHz (Reference card: 2500 MHz)
Game Clock* : up to 2510 MHz (Reference card: 2300 MHz)
Posted on Reply
#23
Veseleil
claesWhy did sapphire put the RGB on the slot side?
Vertical mount expected probably.

TBH I didn't expect Sapphire to choose RGB over better cooling. That strip is clearly in the way of an exhaust. My bet it's on the other side as well. And it's kinda totally opposite direction compared to the reference design. Even though I find it ugly AF, reference might end up being better in every regard.
Posted on Reply
#24
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
1d10t

Another moronic design, 3.5 slot and RGB strips in underside of the cards. I mean like, how you gonna see it? If it two sides then yeah you definitely see partially.
Vertical mount
Posted on Reply
#25
AusWolf
And it's official: we've come to the age when reference designs look way better than AIB versions.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 14:56 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts