CyberCTI just tried DLSS3 for the first time with Cyberpunk on my 4090. While I did notice a minimal addition to input lag, having the game run at 4K maxed out at 120fps most of the time on the projector was awesome. I didn't notice any graphic artifacting. I use a controller for that setup. For a competitive game IDK how well DLSS3 would work with the slight increase in input lag, but so far I really like the DLSS3 technology.

rv8000Have they fixed the camera swap stretching yet? Or the UI flicker? I can’t remember if they fixed that in a previous update. If not what’s the point of another 10-20 fps vs older DLSS version when there are visible artifacts that are way more distracting than an increase to perceived smoothness with no latency improvement.

#stillunimpressed

Garrusexcept it is lying, it is not running at that frame rate, it is smoothed to appear like that frame rate, but not exactly

oxrufiioxoIt's really good in both Witcher/CP2077, I don't care for it in Spiderman/MSFS/A Plague tale because of the UI issues.


I didn't notice that in any camera swap issues in an of the 6 games I've tried it in Witcher, CP2077, Hitman, A plague tale, MSFS, Spiderman you'd probably have to slow it down way below what my 4090 is capable of to notice any of that. I do think lower end GPUs that would benefit the most from this will likely have the most issues.... I did play around with Caps with the Nvidia control panel method in CP2077 and at least down to around 40 fps native 80 fps ish framegen any artifacts were hard to notice.

UI elements are still an issue in some games which to me is a developer issues because they are pretty much non existent in CDPR games.



I agree they shouldn't use it to compare performance the actual technology is super impressive though. This is coming from a person who hates the way TVs do it this is on another level especially in the two CDPR games that use it.

My biggest annoyance with it is not them using it in graphs as long as it’s clearly labeled DLSS3 it's that they couldn't or didn't want to get it working on 30 series.

rv8000The camera swap stretching was strictly related to the one of the F1 games. Flickering UI elements has been an issue across several games, some of that was fixed i a recent update for cyberpunk; to a degree (flickering).

UI artifacts are an immediate NO imo, as they’re very apparent and easily noticeable as they’re continuous static elements that should not changed.

The last time I check the HWUB coverage for DLSS there was a significant amount of ghosting/smearing in the Spider-Man game, to the point of which why are you buying a 4080 and above with a relatively high refresh monitor with quality motion persistence to introduce ghosting, both of which the ladder help prevent.

I think HWUB also did a good job of explaining that DLSS theoretically gets worse the less performant the card is; these lower end cards wouldn’t be able to cross the fps threshold to help hide many of the visual artifacts DLSS 3 introduces. This makes it a pointless feature on cards you’re already getting more than enough FPS with 4070ti/4080/4090 because in many cases you’re decreasing the visual quality for no gain in true latency, and on lower end cards where in a perfect world DLSS 3 would be most useful, the artifacts end up being more noticeable.

Garrusexcept it is lying, it is not running at that frame rate, it is smoothed to appear like that frame rate, but not exactly

JimmyDoogsI'm surprised by DLSS 3 frame generation. I didn't imagine that I would prefer it over DLSS 2 upscaling.

Garrusit gives a poor frame rate and poor visuals in Forza 5, I'm sure you won't prefer it there