Wednesday, September 6th 2023
Intel Core Ultra "Meteor Lake-H" Partial Lineup Leaked
An Intel Core Ultra 7 155H chip was first spotted via a Geekbench entry this morning (as tested in an HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 laptop), followed by several other purported mobile "Meteor Lake" SKUs published by Golden Pig Upgrade's Bilibili account. The aforementioned Core Ultra 7 155H was listed, alongside the additions of higher end Core Ultra 9 185H and Core Ultra 7 165H models. Intel has reportedly been playing around with their naming conventions—engineering samples bearing 1002H and 1003 designations were leaked earlier this summer. A lower end Core Ultra 5 125H chip has also emerged from another new Geekbench registration, sitting inside a next-gen HP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop.
Laptop-oriented Meteor Lake processors are expected to arrive with an updated iGPU technology—very likely Xe-LPG (Alchemist), with a designation of up to 128 EU cores—but the latest Geekbench entries are missing specific information about any graphics processing units, integrated or discrete, utilized by the evaluated HP laptops. Two Geekbench Core Ultra 7 155H entries confirm a base clock of 3.8 GHz with a boost capability upping the ante to around 4.8 GHz. We see counts of 16 cores and 22 threads—the internal configuration seems to consist of 6 P-Cores, 8 E-Cores and 2 lower power cores housed within its SoC die. The best set of Geekbench 6.1 scores posted by the Core Ultra 7 155H comprised 2294 points in single-core and 12749 points in multi-core. A VideoCardz evaluation places this plucky mobile chip in good company: "its single-core score puts it above AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Core 13400 desktop CPUs. The multi-core performance is actually higher than Core i9-12900 non-K or Threadripper PRO 3955WX."VideoCardz has compiled the quartet of leaked Meteor Lake-H mobile chips into a handy chart:Wccftech has generated a comparison chart that features the multi-score tallies of leaked Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 5 125H processors lined up against some competition:
Sources:
VideoCardz #1, VideoCardz #2, Wccftech #1, Wccftech #2, Bilibili, Geekbench #1 (125H), Geekbench #2 (155H)
Laptop-oriented Meteor Lake processors are expected to arrive with an updated iGPU technology—very likely Xe-LPG (Alchemist), with a designation of up to 128 EU cores—but the latest Geekbench entries are missing specific information about any graphics processing units, integrated or discrete, utilized by the evaluated HP laptops. Two Geekbench Core Ultra 7 155H entries confirm a base clock of 3.8 GHz with a boost capability upping the ante to around 4.8 GHz. We see counts of 16 cores and 22 threads—the internal configuration seems to consist of 6 P-Cores, 8 E-Cores and 2 lower power cores housed within its SoC die. The best set of Geekbench 6.1 scores posted by the Core Ultra 7 155H comprised 2294 points in single-core and 12749 points in multi-core. A VideoCardz evaluation places this plucky mobile chip in good company: "its single-core score puts it above AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Core 13400 desktop CPUs. The multi-core performance is actually higher than Core i9-12900 non-K or Threadripper PRO 3955WX."VideoCardz has compiled the quartet of leaked Meteor Lake-H mobile chips into a handy chart:Wccftech has generated a comparison chart that features the multi-score tallies of leaked Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 5 125H processors lined up against some competition:
17 Comments on Intel Core Ultra "Meteor Lake-H" Partial Lineup Leaked
Its just that the way TDP is calculated is different between Intel and AMD (Which in my opinion, is very stupid), Anyway intel is very good & efficient in encoding & decoding, much better than AMD which is what we can see from the image you sent
Look at AMD at 65W, is scores 36% better than intel "per watt"
What do you think TPU tests the efficiency using? accelerators? its the same thing, they use cinebench because its good at this.
Intel Core i9-13900K Review - Power-Hungry Beast - Power Consumption & Efficiency | TechPowerUp
This guy does. Ryzen obliterates again, 10% difference at 125w and 1% at 65w. Total domination :roll:
Every amd cpu that doesn't have the 680m or the 780m is not monolithic, it's a port from the desktop parts
Anyway In the same video you can see the TDP differences section @15:32 and the power draw sections @ 16:05.
I never understand why do you have TO COMPLICATE things where and when is not required???
WTF is this garbage naming??