Wednesday, September 6th 2023

AMD's Lisa Su Endorses TSMC's Fab 21 Arizona Facility

TSMC is having a tough time getting its Phoenix, Arizona facility up to fully functional standards—large-scale production at Fab 21 has been delayed into 2025 (as announced back in July). Cited factors include workforce-related issues and sluggish installation of state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment. These setbacks are not too disconcerting in the eyes of leadership at AMD—today CEO Dr. Lisa Su declared that her firm will be one of the first in line to contract with TSMC's Fab 21, thanks to long established bonds: "I think we have gotten extremely good at managing supply chain, so I would say that is one of our core strengths. TSMC has been a phenomenal partner for us in terms of advanced technology, both on the silicon side as well as the packaging side, and we very much value that relationship." Su and NVIDIA chief Jensen Huang were key figures present at the Arizona facility's December 2022 opening ceremony.

AMD's top brass is in attendance at this year's Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference, alongside arch rival Intel. The latter has already dropped their own revelation for the day. Su commented on North American chip manufacturing circumstances: "When you when you think about the geopolitical situation, geographic diversity is important to us...So, the Arizona factory is very important to us. We are going to be one of the early users, we are putting our first tape outs in shortly with the idea of being a significant user of Arizona. I think we will continue to look at the geographic diversity as an important piece of it." AMD has been fabless since 2009, and relies heavily on TSMC's tried and true Taiwan-based plants to produce CPU, GPU, DPU and FPGA products—it will be interesting to observe how things pan out when some of this output gets shifted over to a fledgling facility positioned out there in the Sonoran desert.
Sources: Tom's Hardware, Guardian UK, Dr. Lisa Su Tweet (from 2022)
Add your own comment

12 Comments on AMD's Lisa Su Endorses TSMC's Fab 21 Arizona Facility

#1
Vayra86
'We will do whatever is needed to secure chip production capacity'

Damn right
Posted on Reply
#2
bonehead123
Now if only she would cough up a few $$BBBB to pay for training and recruiting of the people who want to work at the fab, maybe they can get it back on track for '24.....

oh no, but that would 2-3 fewer new leather jackets for her & her bro in arms... can't have that now, can we :roll:
Posted on Reply
#3
Wye
A multi billion dollar political leverage ploy, destined to operate at clear loss.
/humans
Posted on Reply
#4
TheDeeGee
Evil woman, blocking competition.
Posted on Reply
#5
shoskunk
"AMD has been fabless since 2009.."

Wut? My retired RX480 (circa 2016) was produced at Global Foundaries on a 14NM node.

Try again..
Posted on Reply
#6
claes
Amd completed it’s divestment from gf in 2012
Posted on Reply
#8
shoskunk
claesAmd completed it’s divestment from gf in 2012
Semantics.. A divestiture is used to avoid monopoly (looking at you Amazon).

The initial IP, resources, design for GF was all AMD.. Many of the personnel who built GF plant and got it off the ground were AMD employees (looking at you Boyd).

There are AMD employees working at GF, as I type this, as subcontractors. Their checks say "AMD".

AMD still receives $$$ from GF post-divestiture.

:)
Posted on Reply
#9
trsttte
shoskunkSemantics.. A divestiture is used to avoid monopoly (looking at you Amazon).

The initial IP, resources, design for GF was all AMD.. Many of the personnel who built GF plant and got it off the ground were AMD employees (looking at you Boyd).

There are AMD employees working at GF, as I type this, as subcontractors. Their checks say "AMD".

AMD still receives $$$ from GF post-divestiture.

:)
Doesn't really mean anything, Apple and Nvidia (and AMD) engineers also work along side TSMC to develop new interconnectors and it doesn't make any of them less fabless
Posted on Reply
#10
claes
shoskunkSemantics.. A divestiture is used to avoid monopoly (looking at you Amazon).

The initial IP, resources, design for GF was all AMD.. Many of the personnel who built GF plant and got it off the ground were AMD employees (looking at you Boyd).

There are AMD employees working at GF, as I type this, as subcontractors. Their checks say "AMD".

AMD still receives $$$ from GF post-divestiture.

:)
I think you need to look up what “divestment” and “semantics” mean lol. Your post is like saying that Cadbury made your Dr Pepper
Posted on Reply
#11
shoskunk
I sense backpedaling in the force, Luke!
Posted on Reply
#12
claes
Yeah I guess TSMC is the real developer of most pc hardware :rolleyes:

Probably going to have to look up “backpedaling,” too, and perhaps “monopoly,” what with AMD being the de facto leader in CPU and GPU sales and GF being the largest foundry in the world and all
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 11:50 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts