Thursday, June 13th 2024

B650 Chipset and Micro-ATX Form-factor Dominate Socket AM5 Motherboard Sales: Research

A market research of AMD Socket AM5 motherboards sold in South Korea by Danawa, provide some interesting insights on how gamers approach the platform. This research is confined to Korea, but can be extrapolated to other similar markets. The research studies the chipset model, and form-factor of Socket AM5 motherboards sold in the market. The most interesting finding of the research is that the AMD B650 is by far the most popular chipset for the platform, dwarfing even the entry-level A620 chipset by a factor of 8. A staggering 80% of the Socket AM5 motherboards being sold are based on the B650.

It's important to note here, that this figure does not include the B650E, which is separately shown making up just 2% of the volumes. The B650 (non-E) has nearly all platform features, with motherboards based on the chipset providing at least one Gen 5 M.2 NVMe slot that doesn't eat into the lanes of the x16 PEG slot; and with the current generation of GPUs not featuring the PCIe Gen 5 host interface, customers seem more than happy with the Gen 4 x16 PEG slot provided by B650 motherboards. What's more, you get CPU overclocking and memory overclocking on this mid-range chipset, so it appeals to a very wide demographic. The B650E, on the other hand, provides a Gen 5 x16 PEG slot, and motherboards based on this chipset tend to offer premium I/O features, such as a high-end onboard audio solution, premium wireless networking, among others.
It's interesting to note here that the top-spec X670E chipset has a respectable 5.6% of the volume, which is higher than both the B650E, and the X670 (non-E). This is because the chipset targets the high-end market, with customers who want the best possible platform to go with their Ryzen 9 or Ryzen 7 X3D processors. The X670 loses out on this market because motherboards based on this chipset don't tend to be as premium as the ones based on the X670E, and customers are instead drawn to the B650.

The A620 is unsurprisingly, the second most popular chipset, since it covers the entry-level market. It should ideally be more popular than the B650, but is heavily compromised in terms of I/O (such as Gen 3 PEG), and those shopping for DIY PCs continue to be drawn to a combination of Intel Core i3 and H610 chipset.

The most popular B650 motherboard form-factor is Micro-ATX, which holds a staggering 88% of the volumes. The 240 mm x 240 mm PCB size has everything buyers of the platform would want, since there aren't too many add-on cards to use these days besides a graphics card. The standard ATX (or larger) demographic is 11%. Mini-ITX remains a novelty, and it only has 1% of the market.
Sources: Danawa, harukaze5719 (Twitter)
Add your own comment

31 Comments on B650 Chipset and Micro-ATX Form-factor Dominate Socket AM5 Motherboard Sales: Research

#26
N3utro
I bought an asus X670E crosshair hero to go with my 7800X3D for $400.

That's twice the price of a B650 motherboard for the same performance, but seeing how long the AM4 socket lasted i thought it was worth it to get PCIE 5.0 and top quality components, plus it's usually easier to resell very high end motherboards on the long run because the demand for them is greater. Sold my evga X58 classified motherboard for an insane price 12 years later after i bought it lol.
Posted on Reply
#27
tommo1982
Random_User.....
I understand the wish of the lesser PC footprint. But that is not always a case (no pun intended). There are several reasons:
1. The SFF often is much more luxury hobby, than to build in an ordinary ATX case, with ATX motherboard, with both having the same price or cheaper, than mATX and SFF chassis.
2. The SFF chassis take not much more horizontal desk space than an avarage medium tower, as it mostly takes up the vertical space, which is a non issue, if ofc, the user doesn't live with a celling right above head.
3. Considering the price on the ATX motherboards is usually is the same, as decent mATX and mini-ITX ones. Hence the connectivity and features of "bigger" ATX MBs comes for free.
Again, this is obvious, that many people woud like to reduce the footprint of their PCs, considering the advancement in the technology, this became even more possible. But unfortunately, this still is a premium endeavor, and the space that being excluded from the size of the case and motherboard, might eventually return in the form of additional devices and hubs, etc, which in its turn raises the expences even more.
4. SFF cases do not suit everywhere. Considering, that it often takes a decent medium tower, with a lot of cooling capabilities to tame the powerful GPUs and CPUs. Doing the same in a tiny box might be a torture for the HW, unless it has its performance manually and deliberately reduced. This is just physics. There must be the room for breath, even for PC components.
Of cource, there are many cases with good ventilation, but almost all of them are supposed to avoid any dust filtering, as it will drive them moot otherwise. And there are areas, where the cases without filtering are incceptable. Not because the owners don't clean their rooms, but the air outside is dusty.
Regarding 3rd point. I never understood why SFF is so expensive, considering it needs less components. Demand? I think there's plenty. Many people, who can do without a computer at all, would like to have a tiny box next to their TV to do the basic things, but the prices are not compelling at all. Unless you consider old Dell terminals with i3 or better. Ah, it's really a complex matter and thinking about it makes my head hurt.
Posted on Reply
#28
The Von Matrices
What frustrates me most about recent motherboards is that manufacturers have prioritized M.2 slots over PCIe slots. These motherboards now only have 2-3 PCIe slots negating the main advantage of ATX over mATX which is the ability to use 3 extra PCIe cards.

I personally want a motherboard that exposes all the PCIe lanes as x4, x8, and x16 slots so that I can use regular PCIe cards for all of them. They way, I can use an m.2 adapter card if I want m.2 but also have the flexibility to use a disk controller card or network card or capture card or an extra GPU in the slots if I need it.
Posted on Reply
#29
tommo1982
The Von MatricesWhat frustrates me most about recent motherboards is that manufacturers have prioritized M.2 slots over PCIe slots. These motherboards now only have 2-3 PCIe slots negating the main advantage of ATX over mATX which is the ability to use 3 extra PCIe cards.

I personally want a motherboard that exposes all the PCIe lanes as x4, x8, and x16 slots so that I can use regular PCIe cards for all of them. They way, I can use an m.2 adapter card if I want m.2 but also have the flexibility to use a disk controller card or network card or capture card or an extra GPU in the slots if I need it.
Those M.2 adapter cards with two NVMe PCIe are expensive. I was looking for a used one with RAID, but even the used ones cost too much.
I buy stuff to play with hardware a little, get bored and sell it. It'd get really expensive with new stuff.
Posted on Reply
#30
The Von Matrices
tommo1982Those M.2 adapter cards with two NVMe PCIe are expensive. I was looking for a used one with RAID, but even the used ones cost too much.
I buy stuff to play with hardware a little, get bored and sell it. It'd get really expensive with new stuff.
The cards with more than one slot and a switch chip are expensive, yes. But you can just put in multiple single-drive cards which are dirt cheap since you have 7 pcie slots to work with on an ATX motherboard (maybe a few less if you have a GPU).


I have a stack of about 20 of the PCIe to M.2 cards that I no longer need if you want any. I used to need them for servers before M.2 boot ssd slots became normal and adapters were no longer required.
Posted on Reply
#31
tommo1982
The Von MatricesThe cards with more than one slot and a switch chip are expensive, yes. But you can just put in multiple single-drive cards which are dirt cheap since you have 7 pcie slots to work with on an ATX motherboard (maybe a few less if you have a GPU).


I have a stack of about 20 of the PCIe to M.2 cards that I no longer need if you want any. I used to need them for servers before M.2 boot ssd slots became normal and adapters were no longer required.
I have a mATX board, Asrock B450M Steel Legend. That's why I was looking for two slot M.2 card with RAID.
Thank you for the offer, but the shipping costs would make it more expensive than the cards themselves, and lack of space on the board.
I live in Poland so.. shipping is expensive.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 3rd, 2024 12:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts