Friday, September 27th 2024

Microsoft Revamps Recall for Copilot+ PCs With a Focus on Security Concerns

Today Microsoft published an extensive blog post about the controversial Recall feature that was intended to launch with Copilot+ enabled Windows 11 PCs. To recap on Recall: Recall was announced as a service that creates and stores 'snapshots' of the user's activity on their PC, and uses the neural processing hardware within a Copilot+ certified machine to filter search requests by the user in order to find what they had previously seen. In effect, it took constant screenshots and would index the contents of those screenshots to assist with vague search queries. Saw a very funny picture in Discord a week ago and can't find it but can describe what it looked like? Search Recall and with the power of neural processing it would sift through its index of stored screenshots and attempt to provide you the exact image you described. Or, you could scroll back through the gallery of snapshots yourself to find what you wanted.

The idea of a program or service running in the background taking screenshots of your activity every few seconds yielded some pretty unsavory reactions from just about everyone. To assuage privacy concerns Microsoft did release an update in June committing to a broad set of security improvements to Recall before the preview would be available to test. This latest blog post titled, "Update on Recall security and privacy architecture", outlines more improvements on top of those announced back in June.
Here is the latest outline for Windows Recall:

Recall requires a Copilot+ PC running Windows 11
Copilot+ PCs are those that meet Microsoft's requirements for AI performance and features, as well as the Secured-core standard. To configure Recall at all a machine needs BitLocker, Device Encryption, TPM 2.0, virtualization-based protection of code integrity, Measured Boot, System Guard Service Launch, and Kernel DMA Protection.

Recall will be exclusively opt-in, remaining disabled by default
During initial Windows set up the user will be given a simple opt-in page for Recall with clearly marked "Yes, save" and "No, don't save" buttons to check. The option to save will continue on to configuring Recall, while the option to not save will disable Recall entirely, though it will not uninstall it. If a user skips past Windows' OOBE setup environment by some method and is never presented with this screen, Recall will default to being disabled.
Recall can be removed entirely at any time
Users will be given the option to completely uninstall and remove Recall from their PC at any time. This will hopefully not be the old "uninstall" Cortana fiasco from Windows 10, where the service would still linger in the background and opportunistically reinstall itself with every Windows update. Recall will be presented under the Optional Features menu for users to configure, and should remain uninstalled across updates.

Recall is tied to Windows Hello Sign-in Security and data is always encrypted
All snapshots and associated information are stored within a vector database and encrypted. The encryption keys are protected via TPM, are tied to only that user's Windows Hello identity, and can only be accessed within a Virtualization-based Security Enclave, or VBS Enclave. This means a PC that has multiple users will not allow each to snoop on the other's activity, even if they somehow get into another user's account all Recall data is protected behind biometrics. Services related to Recall operation are isolated and protected as well to safeguard them against malware. Measures for authentication rate limiting and anti-hammering will also be in place.

Security settings are also stored in the VBS Enclave just like encryption keys, and the same Windows Hello authorization will be required to make any changes. If any tampering is detected, the settings will revert to their secure defaults. A fallback access PIN can be configured after Recall has been set up to avoid losing access should any sensors required for Windows Hello be damaged.
Recall cannot capture private browsing, and more comprehensive privacy settings
Recall's default configuration will not capture snapshots of in-private browsing windows on any supported browsers (including Edge, Chrome, Firefox, and Opera) and users can configure filters to disable snapshots of specific websites or apps. Sensitive content filters are enabled by default using Microsoft's Purview privacy toolset, meaning Recall cannot capture passwords, national ID numbers and credit card information. Users also get options for how long snapshots are retained by Recall, how much disk space is utilized for captures, and for wiping any captures from a specified date range or app. A system tray icon for Recall will allow for pausing snapshots at any time, as well as indicate when snapshots are being saved.

After nearly six months of comprehensive security rework, Microsoft hopes to deliver the Recall preview to Windows Insiders in October for further testing before it decides to ship the feature to the masses.
Source: Microsoft
Add your own comment

77 Comments on Microsoft Revamps Recall for Copilot+ PCs With a Focus on Security Concerns

#26
Jermelescu
If some of y'all would think for a bit or got a job you'd figure this is great for productivity. Having a separate machine just for development with this installed is actually great, as I won't spend much time trying to figure out when I saw what, just focus on delivering my software faster and better.
Posted on Reply
#27
mtosev
I can say that I personally find this feature potentially useful. If this isn't enabled by default and/or if it can be disabled I don't see any issue.
Posted on Reply
#28
lexluthermiester
_roman_Some people will not use a microsoft windows online account, secure boot and tpm.
I'm am one of those people. I do my own thing and will not acquiesce to microsoft goose-stepping nonsense.
SL2Deal breaker for what? You're interested in Recall?
It would be interesting to try out, but only on terms that are acceptable to the usage and security ethic I subscribe to. My way is nowhere near the microsoft way.
JermelescuIf some of y'all would think for a bit or got a job you'd figure this is great for productivity.
Nice insult. Proves you need to take your own advice..
Posted on Reply
#29
AVATARAT
Microsoft does this because they knows that most people who use Windows can't configure anything, they just click "next, next". So they're going to use all these people to learn their AI with attractive data.
I think Microsoft just needs another lawsuit against Windows and I think they will find it.
Posted on Reply
#30
Vayra86
They better totally recall this feature before it blows up in their face again. I might grow three tits before I see this installed on my PC
mtosevI can say that I personally find this feature potentially useful. If this isn't enabled by default and/or if it can be disabled I don't see any issue.
You don't? I'd rather see them distribute this as an optional store app with no trace of it on my system whatsoever. I think you are glossing over the fact this is a fan-tas-tic attack vector for a wide range of purposes, and even if you have it disabled, it will most likely pose an additional security threat by just having the service reside on the system. So even if you are choosing not to deal with it, you're still more compromised than you were before.

In the mind of Microsoft though, the reason they don't do that is because their strategy has invested in AI to provide their OS a unique selling point, and Recall is that thing for them, because the overall sentiment thus far really is 'the consumer doesn't really think much about AI' and 'there's just not much that is of true benefit to consumers just yet'. So you get these turds flying at walls. Solutions looking for problems. This was never about privacy or security, it was, is and will always be all and only about Microsoft clasping their market share tightly to their chest, hoping you might stay because they've just done some magic for you. They're not too keen on telling you that magic is actually secure, that's just an afterthought - and only after the fact people complained scanned shit was just available in plain text.

And that makes you all warm and cozy inside. Okay.
Posted on Reply
#31
lexluthermiester
AVATARATI think Microsoft just needs another lawsuit against Windows and I think they will find it.
In my opinion, microsoft needs to be broken up and Windows made it's own company.
Posted on Reply
#32
Kodehawa
This is such a scary feature. I don't think anyone, and I mean /anyone/ I've ever talked to liked this, either. I don't understand what's the matter with MS pushing stuff literally no one in earth agrees with.
Posted on Reply
#33
lexluthermiester
KodehawaThis is such a scary feature. I don't think anyone, and I mean /anyone/ I've ever talked to liked this, either. I don't understand what's the matter with MS pushing stuff literally no one in earth agrees with.
You're not wrong. This could so easily be abused in many many ways. Very scary indeed.
Posted on Reply
#34
DavidC1
Has noone heard of Five Eyes and many other disturbing privacy revelations by Edward Snowden?

This is done on purpose. It isn't just Microsoft being dumb. This feature would push it to in-your-face. They're going to be ever more intrusive in invading your privacy as time goes on.
Posted on Reply
#35
64K
AVATARATMicrosoft does this because they knows that most people who use Windows can't configure anything, they just click "next, next". So they're going to use all these people to learn their AI with attractive data.
I think Microsoft just needs another lawsuit against Windows and I think they will find it.
That is true and it's often overlooked that the vast majority of PC users don't know much about Windows at all. They just want it to work. Most that I know only know the basic functions. Even using the Task Manager for simple things isn't well known. If they have even heard about Linux they wouldn't know where to begin with it and if they did they would almost certainly go back to Windows if for no other reason than that's what they use at work along with MS Office. MS apologists like to point out the things that the tech informed can do to stop MS from abusing them so it's not a big deal but the average person can't do these things and it's not about lack of intelligence. It's just not common knowledge. Using myself as an example I know how a car engine works. I know the name of most of the parts but I wouldn't know where to begin to do engine repairs. It would end in a clusterfuck if I ever tried it.
Posted on Reply
#36
Bayfront Benny
I just don't understand why MS insists on features absolutely nobody wants. Why??
Posted on Reply
#37
chrcoluk
Why on earth would someone want this as a feature, its spyware, Microsoft caught trying to make it on by default, but if it vanished entirely it would have looked odd so here it is.
Posted on Reply
#38
TheinsanegamerN
LycanwolfenOh great Bit Locker has to be enabled. Our office went to Intune and Bitlocker and it turned into a complete nightmare sometimes. You cannot upgrade any hardware with bit locker 2.0 turned on so if you change say memroy or cpu you have to decrypt the drive. Then upgrade or ghost to new hard drive then you have to encrypt it again. Also some updates can cause bitlocker to ask for a key on boot up this pisses off our users quite a bit. Bitlocker is a total joke IF MS had not invented it ransomware would not have been invented as well.
My favorite thing when we went to intune+entra+LAPS+bitlocker, was the explanation of how, instead of logging in with a local admin account, we now had to log onto one console, find the PC, copy a long has that was the new local password, then log onto ANOTHER console, find ANOTHER long hash, and type that in to unlock the bitlocker.

Took recovering files from a borked windows install from a 5 minute job to multiple hours, or impossible. Especially when intune sees the machine but doesnt enroll it in entra, or vice versa, or a wipe fails, or......

MS software sucks MAJOR arse.
Bayfront BennyI just don't understand why MS insists on features absolutely nobody wants. Why??
Without getting too deep into conspiracy theories: Look up the five eyes, and the fourteen eyes, and imagine why they'd want to be able to see a recording of anyone's desktop at any time. Then see how much gov't funding MS has received every year.
Posted on Reply
#39
A&P211
You can remove Co-pilot from windows, go into the Add or remove programs, find co-pilot, remove it, I did.
Posted on Reply
#40
JWNoctis
chrcolukWhy on earth would someone want this as a feature, its spyware, Microsoft caught trying to make it on by default, but if it vanished entirely it would have looked odd so here it is.
KodehawaThis is such a scary feature. I don't think anyone, and I mean /anyone/ I've ever talked to liked this, either. I don't understand what's the matter with MS pushing stuff literally no one in earth agrees with.
So it would paint a salient target everyone would focus on, while business went on as usual with everything else? I'm only half-joking.

Either way, may it prove useful to folks with less...well, concerns./s
Posted on Reply
#41
AusWolf
A&P211You can remove Co-pilot from windows, go into the Add or remove programs, find co-pilot, remove it, I did.
It's still bad that Windows comes with intrusive and useless features that you have to remove manually. Isn't this what the app store is for? So you could install all the garbage you need when you need it?
Posted on Reply
#42
dyonoctis
lexluthermiesterIn my opinion, microsoft needs to be broken up and Windows made it's own company.
Windows should be donated to ReactOS
Posted on Reply
#43
Jermelescu
Bayfront BennyI just don't understand why MS insists on features absolutely nobody wants. Why??
Have you actually tried Recall when you could have gotten your hands on it? It's incredible. Avoiding spending so much time trying to figure out when I saw what is fantastic for my business going forward.
Posted on Reply
#44
lexluthermiester
dyonoctisWindows should be donated to ReactOS
While we all know you're joking, the ReactOS guys could hardly do worse..
JermelescuHave you actually tried Recall when you could have gotten your hands on it? It's incredible. Avoiding spending so much time trying to figure out when I saw what is fantastic for my business going forward.
No one is denying how useful it can be. However, as there is a huge potential for security problems, whether business confidentiality or personal privacy, the risk of abuse is COMPLETELY unacceptable. The simple answer is, if that risk is not a problem for you, feel free. However if you're anyone who works in a field where information and data security are important, critical or legally compelled, the use of Recall functionality is absolutely unacceptable on any level.
Posted on Reply
#45
Jermelescu
lexluthermiesterWhile we all know you're joking, the ReactOS guys could hardly do worse..


No one is denying how useful it can be. However, as there is a huge potential for security problems, whether business confidentiality or personal privacy, the risk of abuse is COMPLETELY unacceptable. The simple answer is, if that risk is not a problem for you, feel free. However if you're anyone who works in a field where information and data security are important, critical or legally compelled, the use of Recall functionality is absolutely unacceptable on any level.
We'll have to wait and see. If there will be data leaks Microsoft is gonna be in its biggest trouble since founding, so I doubt they'll let it happen.
If it will be proven that it's safe, it will be a gamechanger (that's if it will not be used as a Big Brother thingy by corporations).
Posted on Reply
#46
lexluthermiester
JermelescuWe'll have to wait and see. If there will be data leaks Microsoft is gonna be in its biggest trouble since founding, so I doubt they'll let it happen.
If it will be proven that it's safe, it will be a gamechanger (that's if it will not be used as a Big Brother thingy by corporations).
Even if there are no software vulnerabilities ever(LMAO), the problem with unauthorized or illicit access is ever present which can never be understated or ignored. It's still unacceptable for a lot of use-case-scenarios.
Posted on Reply
#47
Easo
The comments, as usual, are far more entertaining than the article itself.
Also lol at all the Bitlocker claims here, just lol.
Posted on Reply
#48
SOAREVERSOR
LycanwolfenOh great Bit Locker has to be enabled. Our office went to Intune and Bitlocker and it turned into a complete nightmare sometimes. You cannot upgrade any hardware with bit locker 2.0 turned on so if you change say memroy or cpu you have to decrypt the drive. Then upgrade or ghost to new hard drive then you have to encrypt it again. Also some updates can cause bitlocker to ask for a key on boot up this pisses off our users quite a bit. Bitlocker is a total joke IF MS had not invented it ransomware would not have been invented as well.
You do not have to decrypt the drive you can toggle bitlocker.

FWIW for actual work use most clients are going to require encryption. Bitlocker is the least nasty of the options and causes the least headaches.
Posted on Reply
#49
AusWolf
lexluthermiesterEven if there are no software vulnerabilities ever(LMAO), the problem with unauthorized or illicit access is ever present which can never be understated or ignored. It's still unacceptable for a lot of use-case-scenarios.
The biggest illicit access is presumably done by Microsoft themselves, as they're sifting through your personal usage history with AI, looking for useful info to sell to advertisers (after having you pay a buttload of money for the OS first). I find such practice disgusting and unacceptable.
Posted on Reply
#50
ymdhis
Using AI to make it easier to search on your PC isn't exactly a bad idea, I have a very large amount of pics on my machine and very often can't find the one I'm looking for. If AI allowed you to search your gallery like "that image where x does y while wearing a red dress", that could be neat.

But making screenshots of your activity every other second to index the AI, that's a very big no-no.

I don't understand what the hell is so wrong at Microsoft. Ever since Windows 7, they completely lost the plot. To be fair Windows 7 was so good because it was just what Vista should have been in the first place.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 19th, 2025 03:10 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts