Friday, October 4th 2024

Starfield Shattered Space Fails To Impress With 'Mostly Negative' Steam Reviews

Starfield's Shattered Space DLC launched on September 30, and it was meant to address many of the base game's major issues, with a more hand-crafted feel, more intimate encounters, and a more narrative-driven gameplay experience. Instead, Steam gamers and critics alike have lambasted the expansion online for boring and underwhelming, repetitive gameplay, calling it "more Starfield," essentially repeating the story of Starfield's initial launch. At the time of writing, the Shattered Space DLC has 1,601 reviews on Steam, with only just over 34% of those reviews rating the expansion positively—placing it squarely in the "Mostly Negative" category on Steam.

Likely the biggest disappointment when it comes to Shattered Space's poor reception is that the Starfield player base actually seemed quite optimistic about the expansion, thanks to previous gameplay and interviews about the intention behind the expansion. Critically, however, Starfield developer, Bethesda, deliberately didn't send out game keys to the press for review prior to the launch of the game, so there was no real way for players to know whether they would enjoy the $29.99 expansion before buying it.

As mentioned before, most of the negative reviews mention stale, repetitive gameplay that is underwhelming, although there are also complaints of disjointed writing and poor acting ruining the immersion. Others also lamented the DLC's $29.99 price tag, especially considering the "mediocre" gameplay experience and short runtime it ultimately delivered.

Shattered Space is meant to meaningfully expand on Starfield lore by letting players interact with a faction they had encountered in the main game but had never actually dealt with in any meaningful way:
Shattered Space is a new story expansion for Starfield, Bethesda Game Studios' epic role-playing game and first new universe in more than twenty-five years. A mysterious power stirs in the city of Dazra on House Va'Ruun's hidden homeworld. Investigate a frightening cosmic threat, explore a new planet, and find unique weapons, spacesuits, and gear in this all-new adventure.

When a distress signal from a derelict starstation sparks a journey to Va'Ruun'kai, the veil of secrecy surrounding the worshippers of a deity known as "The Great Serpent" is finally lifted. Immerse yourself in the dark and complex world of House Va'Ruun, as you navigate a tense political landscape, uncover the history of the Va'Ruun people and help decide the fate of the faction in the wake of a cataclysmic event.
What few positive sentiments there are among the Steam reviews praise the environmental design, visuals and atmosphere, while some of the more important fights in the DLC also received positive comments. The Steam review score will likely change over the coming weekend as more players pick up the expansion and pen their thoughts, but for now, it's safe to say that the community isn't particularly enthralled.

Source: Steam
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Starfield Shattered Space Fails To Impress With 'Mostly Negative' Steam Reviews

#26
AGlezB
Vayra86Maybe its a space travel simulator?
With a loading screen between each step. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#27
Vayra86
AGlezBWith a loading screen between each step. :laugh:
Totally missed opportunity for them to just make it all hyperspace jumps and then just showing us a screen that matches that instead of 'Please wait, loading' ... Countless space games have gone before them showing how its done, too. Its really odd if you think of it; and it makes the overall verdict on the game's design even worse :P
ecin96It's good/bad ratio of 1:2 for me. Played 300 hours and don't recommend it. Now ultra cautious of all future games they make. But if you buy any game on day one, expect pain.
Pain is fine, bugs are fine, but if there's just nothing substantial on offer, that's terrible, whether you're in on day one or year two.
Posted on Reply
#28
Neo_Morpheus
persondbI kinda don't understand people as Cyperpunk 2077 is just as bad but that had a 'redemption' even though the game itself was bad to mid at best, with bad combat, stale gameplay, terrible storyline and all kind of issues.

So I really wonder how CD Projekt Red managed to spin it but Bethesda could not when both of those games are so alike(at how bad they are).
My theory?

Remember the crazy backlash just because it was sponsored by AMD?

Or the rumors that AMD was blocking the use of DLSS on the PC version?

Hell, Tim from Ngreedia Unboxed released 3 hit pieces against AMD just because of that rumor and of course, never apologized after the rumors were proven wrong.

On the other hand, Cyberpunk was a showcase of all Ngreedia anticonsumer tech and pusher of everyone's hyped feature called RT.

Anyways, it is what it is and Starfield might end up being considered a failure no matter if it is a good game or not.
Posted on Reply
#29
EatingDirt
persondbI kinda don't understand people as Cyperpunk 2077 is just as bad but that had a 'redemption' even though the game itself was bad to mid at best, with bad combat, stale gameplay, terrible storyline and all kind of issues.

So I really wonder how CD Projekt Red managed to spin it but Bethesda could not when both of those games are so alike(at how bad they are).
Is Cyberpunk 2077 'just as bad' though? CP2077 is, in every way, better than Starfield. CP2077 is no masterpiece, but I'd consider it, at this point, to be a good game. I'd be interested to hear what you think Starfield does better, because it's certainly not graphics, gameplay, storyline or combat.
SteevoI still haven't really done anything in Starfield. I hoped they would fix the issues and stability and I could start again. Maybe it's not the next Skyrim.
Neo_MorpheusAnyways, it is what it is and Starfield might end up being considered a failure no matter if it is a good game or not.
Starfield is, from a game design standpoint, fundamentally flawed. Bethesda games are typically good games, made great by the modding community. Starfield at it's core is not a good game, it's mediocre if we're being generous. That, combined with the fundamentally flawed choice of engine for a space game (that requires loading screens for basically everything), means most of the foundational modding community for bethesda games abandoned it.
Posted on Reply
#30
Chrispy_
Oh apparently I have the expansion for free, I thought the Premium Edition free Starfield offer was limited to 7900-class GPUs....

Played it a bit last night. It's as awful as everyone is saying; Bethesda is stuck trying to make a game for 2011 but all the people who know how to do that left the studio a decade ago. Honestly, it feels like they made Shattered Space at the same time as the base game, except that rather than sell the whole as one, they intentionally paywalled the Var'uun side of things off to artificially create fake DLC.

The absence of any House of Var'uun stuff in the base game feels like it was forcefully removed from the launch game like someone being knocked out by thugs and waking up to find a kidney missing. Now that we have that metaphorical kidney back, it's damaged - ie, it has all the failings of the base game at launch (bugs, T-posing, lifeless acting, no player agency, shitty monochrome filters over everything).
EatingDirtIs Cyberpunk 2077 'just as bad' though? CP2077 is, in every way, better than Starfield. CP2077 is no masterpiece, but I'd consider it, at this point, to be a good game. I'd be interested to hear what you think Starfield does better, because it's certainly not graphics, gameplay, storyline or combat.
CP2077 was rushed out the door well before it was ready, and honestly it wasn't until the 2.0 patch came along that the base game was what I'd call "finished", a good couple of years after the terrible launch.

Starfield was delayed by Microsoft for a year because the original 2022 launch date would have meant a catastrophically buggy and unfinished game, much like CP2077's Christmas 2020 launch fiasco. The fact it was in QC and refinement for a year and still launched an incomplete and buggy mess speaks volumes. By patch 1.3 CP2077 was objectively a good game.

I think the biggest scam of Starfield was this:

Posted on Reply
#31
persondb
EatingDirtIs Cyberpunk 2077 'just as bad' though? CP2077 is, in every way, better than Starfield. CP2077 is no masterpiece, but I'd consider it, at this point, to be a good game. I'd be interested to hear what you think Starfield does better, because it's certainly not graphics, gameplay, storyline or combat.
I cannot say objectively which one is better or worse. I wasn't saying 'just as bad' as in pure quality, but the change in the reception.

For the actual game, I did not enjoy either of them. Starfield was just... boring, bland, it's just a bethesda game but with everything made worse.

In my personal opinion, CP77 is very bad though, design wise, it's not a good game. It's a looter shooter with very lite RPG mechanics. I did not play the entire game, nor did I play the 2.0 patch, but I do not think they improved the things that I care about.
I did not like the story that I experienced, as I said I did not play the entire game, I do remember the flashback and Jack death being very cheap pointless.

What I do have to give is that graphics wise that CP77 is very impressive even without RT.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 4th, 2024 03:48 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts