Friday, November 8th 2024

Intel to Tease Arc "Battlemage" Discrete GPU in December?

Intel is expected to debut its next-generation Arc "Battlemage" discrete GPU in December 2024, or ahead of the 2025 CES, HotHardware reports, citing Golden Pig Upgrade, a reliable source with GPU leaks. The source says that they expect "wonderful performance" for the GPU. Intel has a lot invested in its PC graphics division, across not just its two-year-old Arc "Alchemist" discrete GPUs, but also the integrated graphics solutions it's been launching with its Core Ultra processor generations. It debuted the DirectX 12 Ultimate-capable Xe-LPG graphics architecture with Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" and Arc Graphics branding, which it carried forward to the Core Ultra Series 200 "Arrow Lake" on the desktop platform. Meanwhile, "Battlemage" got debuted as the iGPU of the Core Ultra 200V series "Lunar Lake" mobile processor, which posted gaming performance beating that of the Ryzen 8000 "Hawk Point" processor, but falling short of the Ryzen AI 300 series "Strix Point."

Intel is expected to tap into a fairly new foundry node for the Arc "Battlemage" discrete GPU series. Its chips could strike a performance/Watt and performance/price inflection point in the performance segment, that drives the most volumes for NVIDIA and AMD. It is this exact segment that AMD has withdrawn from the enthusiast segment to focus on, with its next-generation Radeon RDNA 4 generation. With "Alchemist," Intel already laid a strong foundation for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI, and the company is only expected to advance on these fronts further. Could "Battlemage" and "Granite Rapids" go down as the most exciting products from Intel in 2024? We should find out next month.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel to Tease Arc "Battlemage" Discrete GPU in December?

#26
yfn_ratchet
The obsession with Battlemage aiming for high end is doomed to disappoint and people should really be likening this to the RX 8000 series. They don't have to make huge waves for Battlemage to be a success.

Even matching the tail of high end for this generation (7800XT, 4070 SUPER) for a far lower price is enough, especially for someone with interests such as myself. I don't care about flavor-blasting my games into Mega Super Duper Awesome Quality at 4K, I just need something to drive games at 1440p and Index HMD resolutions. Top-tier Battlemage/RDNA4 could achieve that for me, and I imagine a lot of people looking to buy OEM/SI gaming systems will notice the FPS charts don't look super different but the price sure does.
Posted on Reply
#27
lexluthermiester
SOAREVERSORIntel has fallen behind before and come back.
SOAREVERSORThey trade blows and it comes and goes.
Exactly. And ARC is not crap. They had a rough, but not terrible, start. The drivers are just wonderful at this point.
yfn_ratchetThe obsession with Battlemage aiming for high end is doomed to disappoint
But that's it, they're not. Intel is aiming at the midrange market sector, where MOST people are buying at. They're at that level now and the A770/A750/A580 are very good value buys.
Posted on Reply
#28
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
TheinsanegamerNIf intel manages to launch battlemage with no driver regressions from Alchemist, and has substantial improvements in raw power, they may have a winner. But based on meteor lake, I wouldnt be holding my breath. Meteor lake's XE2 drivers were utterly broken and even now are less stable then alchemist.
Xe2 is lunar lake which did quite well. Meteor lake is Xe which is alchemist.
Posted on Reply
#29
Scrizz
SOAREVERSORback when they were ATi with the 9700pro and the 9800pro.
Good times. I had a 256MB 9800pro that I flashed to a 9800XT
Posted on Reply
#30
Crazybc
I will wait and see. Who knows what we are going to get but Intel hasn't exactly been hitting home runs lately with there products.
Posted on Reply
#31
kondamin
lexluthermiesterWhy 32GB?
because I doubt they are going to be introducing n hbm version with more
Posted on Reply
#32
lexluthermiester
kondaminbecause I doubt they are going to be introducing n hbm version with more
Um, but 32GB? Nothing gaming related needs that yet and no one will be using ARC for the kind of compute that would need that much VRAM.
Posted on Reply
#33
kondamin
lexluthermiesterUm, but 32GB? Nothing gaming related needs that yet and no one will be using ARC for the kind of compute that would need that much VRAM.
if They have it available and the price is right those working on compute will flock to it.
Posted on Reply
#34
_roman_
This just shows how long it takes to make a proper graphic card.

Intel really needs manpower and knowledge for software quality and bug hunting in existing products. Maybe also proper hardware designers who knows about software.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:49 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts