Monday, January 6th 2025
AMD Launches Ryzen 9 9000X3D Series "Zen 5" Desktop Processors with 3D V-Cache
AMD today expanded its Ryzen 9000X3D line of Socket AM5 desktop processors that combine the "Zen 5" microarchitecture with 3D V-Cache technology, with the introduction of two high core-count models, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. The 9950X3D is a 16-core/32-thread chip, while the 9900X3D is 12-core/24-thread. These are dual-CCD processors, and much like the Ryzen 9 7000X3D, the 3D V-Cache is only present on one of the two CCDs, while the other is a regular CCD with just the 32 MB on-die L3 cache. There is one key difference, though. Since AMD has redesigned 3D V-Cache for "Zen 5" to be below the CCD and not above, the CCD with it has the same clock speed boosting characteristics as the CCD without 3D V-Cache; and AMD has worked to refine its software-based OS scheduler optimization such that productivity applications favor either of the CCDs, while games stick to the one with 3D V-Cache.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D comes with a base frequency of 4.30 GHz, and boosts up to 5.70 GHz, with a 170 W TDP. This is much higher than the 5.20 GHz maximum boost frequency of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which makes the 9950X3D the company's fastest gaming desktop processor. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is similarly interesting—you get a base frequency of 4.40 GHz, and 5.50 GHz maximum boost frequency, which is higher than that of the 9800X3D, although the CCD with the 3D V-Cache only has 6 cores. The 9950X3D should hence end up beating the 9800X3D in gaming workloads, while the 9900X3D should be either on par or slightly slower than the 9800X3D at gaming, although faster than any chip from the non-X3D Ryzen 9000 series.AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is on average 8% faster than the 7950X3D, and on average 20% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K in gaming workloads, tested across 40 games. It's also 13% faster than the 7950X3D at productivity, and 10% faster than the 285K across the same productivity tests. The company hence claims that the 9950X3D will be the "world's best processor" for both gaming and productivity, ceding no ground to Intel. The company made no first-party performance claims for the 9900X3D. AMD says that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D will be available in Q1 2025.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D comes with a base frequency of 4.30 GHz, and boosts up to 5.70 GHz, with a 170 W TDP. This is much higher than the 5.20 GHz maximum boost frequency of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which makes the 9950X3D the company's fastest gaming desktop processor. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is similarly interesting—you get a base frequency of 4.40 GHz, and 5.50 GHz maximum boost frequency, which is higher than that of the 9800X3D, although the CCD with the 3D V-Cache only has 6 cores. The 9950X3D should hence end up beating the 9800X3D in gaming workloads, while the 9900X3D should be either on par or slightly slower than the 9800X3D at gaming, although faster than any chip from the non-X3D Ryzen 9000 series.AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is on average 8% faster than the 7950X3D, and on average 20% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K in gaming workloads, tested across 40 games. It's also 13% faster than the 7950X3D at productivity, and 10% faster than the 285K across the same productivity tests. The company hence claims that the 9950X3D will be the "world's best processor" for both gaming and productivity, ceding no ground to Intel. The company made no first-party performance claims for the 9900X3D. AMD says that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D will be available in Q1 2025.
59 Comments on AMD Launches Ryzen 9 9000X3D Series "Zen 5" Desktop Processors with 3D V-Cache
vs
www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-7-9800x3d.html
My only hope is that it makes the regular 9950x cheaper.
It's just that if someone is looking for a CPU for productivity (and thus more cores), I don't think that spending more for extra cache that brings some scheduler issues (on windows) is that worth it for the extra perf in some games.
But to each their own, I can understand (can't empathize, but still can get the argument) if they absolutely need to have the extra productivity perf, but at the same time gaming is their top priority.
A lot of articles in the press only present the higher boost clock, but says nothing about the base clock, which once again is all about marketing.
I may be wrong but I foresee a repeat of the 7950x3d versus the 7800x3d.