Saturday, July 26th 2025

Intel Considering Spinning Off its Network and Edge Group

According to a report over at CRN, Intel is looking at spinning off its Network and Edge Group—also known as NEX—and is now looking for investors to take over the business unit. This is according to an internal memo that CRN has been privy to, and it was sent out by the Network and Edge Group lead, Sachin Katti, who has recently been promoted to Chief Technology and AI Officer at Intel. For those not familiar with the Network and Edge Group at Intel, this is the division that makes Intel's Ethernet chips and communications products, as technically it's no longer doing edge computing, since that business was merged with its Client Computing Group in September 2024.

It appears that Intel won't divest the group entirely, as the company "will remain an anchor investor in the new company." This would make sense, as it would allow Intel to continue to influence the direction of product development and still have direct access to the products the new entity will produce. Katti also wrote that this should help NEX "expand into new segments more effectively," whatever those might be, although it's unclear why Intel was unable to do this on its own. Katti continued the memo with "What we expect to change is our ability to operate with greater focus, speed and flexibility—all to better meet your needs," suggesting that Intel's customers have found other partners that better suit their requirements. Over the past few years, Intel has struggled with some of its recent 2.5 Gbps Ethernet products, as they've had several bugs that haven't been properly resolved in some cases, despite multiple hardware revisions. The company launched new 2.5 and 10 Gbps Ethernet products in the E610-series earlier this year, but there doesn't appear to have been much market uptake of the new products either. The question now is how many more business units Intel can shed, until there's nothing but the core CPU business left.
Source: CRN
Add your own comment

50 Comments on Intel Considering Spinning Off its Network and Edge Group

#1
MachineLearning
Is Lip-Bu Tan trying to totally dismantle Intel? Mass layoffs, cancelled 18A, talks of NEX and foundry spinoff. I'm far from an expert, but this feels short-sighted. Help me to understand.
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
MachineLearningIs Lip-Bu Tan trying to totally dismantle Intel? Mass layoffs, cancelled 18A, talks of NEX and foundry spinoff. I'm far from an expert, but this feels short-sighted. Help me to understand.
Your guess is as good as mine. Intel divested Altera, but kept a 49 percent stake in it, so maybe this will be something similar. That said, Intel paid around US$16.7 billion for Altera in 2015 and the 51 percent share it sold Silver Lake was only valued at US$8.75 billion, so over almost 10 years, Intel made almost nothing, obviously not including products sold.
This seems to often be the case with companies Intel have bought, as I mentioned elsewhere. One of many bad deals Intel made was when it bought Lantiq for US$345 million and then sold that division to MaxLinear for a mere US$150 million, five years later after having produced a ton of unsuccessful consumer gateway/router ICs.
Posted on Reply
#3
trparky
MachineLearningIs Lip-Bu Tan trying to totally dismantle Intel? Mass layoffs, cancelled 18A, talks of NEX and foundry spinoff. I'm far from an expert, but this feels short-sighted. Help me to understand.
Yes!!!

He basically gutting the company like a pig. This is it folks, the end of a once great chip maker. Time to pull out the bugle.
Posted on Reply
#4
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
This makes me more nervous than the other stuff they cut. Intel NICs are king and good adapters from other companies are almost nonexistent in enterprise.
Posted on Reply
#5
mechtech
hmmm

ya that i225 i226 debacle didn't help things...........
Posted on Reply
#6
katzi
It's as if one of those Vulture capital things bought intel and are now Gutting it and selling it off piece by piece to kill it.
Posted on Reply
#7
trparky
Solaris17This makes me more nervous than the other stuff they cut. Intel NICs are king and good adapters from other companies are almost nonexistent in enterprise.
All we’ll have left is RealTek and although they’re not bad in the consumer space, they don’t have a much of a foot in the data center space.
Posted on Reply
#8
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
trparkyAll we’ll have left is RealTek and although they’re not bad in the consumer space, they really don’t have a foot in the data center space.
Time to start that farm I guess.
Posted on Reply
#9
tfp
Yeah seems like Lip-Bu Tan is trying to get the company ready for private equity purchase. It was a mistake to bring him back after he left the board. While drastic things needed to be done his actions are extreme and his comments make it sound like he sees no real future in the company. I expect he is well compensated for his actions.
Posted on Reply
#10
TheLostSwede
News Editor
trparkyAll we’ll have left is RealTek and although they’re not bad in the consumer space, they don’t have a much of a foot in the data center space.
Did you forget about Broadcom, Marvell, MaxLinear, Microchip and Nvidia, to mention a few?
MaxLinear has consumer 2.5 Gbps products and should hopefully have a 10 Gbps option coming as well and Marvell has a full range of consumer suitable products as well.
Posted on Reply
#11
mtosev
I really like Intel's networking hardware.
Posted on Reply
#12
Prime2515102
trparkyYes!!!

He basically gutting the company like a pig. This is it folks, the end of a once great chip maker. Time to pull out the bugle.
Hardly. Their revenue for the quarter was still 12.9b and was flat year-over-year (AMD's was 7.438 billion for comparison). Yeah, they're definitely headed in the wrong direction, but it's nowhere close to calling the game. They lost $2.9b but with that kind of revenue they're still a long way from going under. They're still worth $100b and that's nothing to sneeze at. A lot can certainly change in a relatively short amount of time though.

All they need is a 6Ghz all-core, 16-P-core, 0-E-core, 512MB L3 CPU (that doesn't self-destruct) at the price of a Ryzen X3D 8-core and they'll be back on top in no time. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#13
Pepamami
AX200 and AX210 still a mess for me xd
TheLostSwedeDid you forget about Broadcom, Marvell, MaxLinear, Microchip and Nvidia, to mention a few?
MaxLinear has consumer 2.5 Gbps products and should hopefully have a 10 Gbps option coming as well and Marvell has a full range of consumer suitable products as well.
I bet Intel follows the same logic: "people have only realtek as alternative, relax!"
Posted on Reply
#14
Dristun
Prime2515102All they need is a 6Ghz all-core, 16-P-core, 0-E-core, 512MB L3 CPU (that doesn't self-destruct) at the price of a Ryzen X3D 8-core and they'll be back on top in no time. :laugh:
If only gamers weren't worth jack shit in the grand scheme of things, haha. Just check Nvidia's market cap in something like 2011.
Posted on Reply
#15
Pepamami
Prime2515102All they need is a 6Ghz all-core, 16-P-core, 0-E-core, 512MB L3 CPU (that doesn't self-destruct) at the price of a Ryzen X3D 8-core and they'll be back on top in no time. :laugh:
nuuh they will try to pull some stuff like "pay us extra for this and this. oooh u want 512 l3? U have to use Z chipset only, sorry bud."

I dropped Intel myself, after I was not able to simply change clock of my ram to 3200 on some H-chipset. I agree I should have checked it, but I did not even think that this is gonna be like this.
Posted on Reply
#16
TechLurker
And then there's AMD slowly entering the NIC market.
Posted on Reply
#17
TheLostSwede
News Editor
TechLurkerAnd then there's AMD slowly entering the NIC market.
Why should AMD make network products? There's already at least half a dozen companies that make suitable hardware.
AMD integrates 10 and 100 Gbps MACs in some of their CPUs, but rely on third party PHYs. Yes, it would be nice to get this into the consumer range of chips too, but for some reason AMD doesn't seem to think this makes sense.
Unless you can come up with a low cost solution like Realtek or offer something really high-end an somewhat unique, you're going to have too much competition.
Posted on Reply
#18
phanbuey
TheLostSwedeWhy should AMD make network products? There's already at least half a dozen companies that make suitable hardware.
AMD integrates 10 and 100 Gbps MACs in some of their CPUs, but rely on third party PHYs. Yes, it would be nice to get this into the consumer range of chips too, but for some reason AMD doesn't seem to think this makes sense.
Unless you can come up with a low cost solution like Realtek or offer something really high-end an somewhat unique, you're going to have too much competition.
I completely agree - Nvidia has been very strategic about it's initiatives ever since CUDA - physX, ARM etc. they've slowsly made their way into other business lines when there was a tangible synergy/ value to be extracted.

They could have released a CPU ages ago, but are entering now when unified memory is in high demand and this system makes the most sense. Their networking products are also related to their GPU servers and optimized for synergistic use case scenarios with other Nvidia products.

Gsync/monitor chips, motherboard chipsets etc. - even the failed initiatives had a logical connection to their GPU.

Intel just bought a ton of random stuff that had nothing to do with it's core business, nor did it synergize in any way with their processors, and then inserted their overbloated management bureacreacy on top of it, and then were shocked when the competition destroyed them.

AMD entering networking without a clear tangible connection to CPUs/GPUs would be pulling an intel - but I suspect they're just copying nvidia and making special nics to connect MIx servers together.
Posted on Reply
#19
TristanX
This is pretty rational move as they need money now, and networks have nothing to do with CPU. They should also sell Mobileye, as car's equipment is even more separate from CPU.
Look like 14A will be just too costly for Intel needs, so they should build new fabs in financial cooperation with other companies like NV / Apple / Quallcom.. This way they will form great competition to TSMC, keeping manufacturing costs at low level. Something similar what AMD did with their new fabs.
Posted on Reply
#20
TechBuyingHavoc
phanbueyI completely agree - Nvidia has been very strategic about it's initiatives ever since CUDA - physX, ARM etc. they've slowsly made their way into other business lines when there was a tangible synergy/ value to be extracted.

They could have released a CPU ages ago, but are entering now when unified memory is in high demand and this system makes the most sense. Their networking products are also related to their GPU servers and optimized for synergistic use case scenarios with other Nvidia products.

Gsync/monitor chips, motherboard chipsets etc. - even the failed initiatives had a logical connection to their GPU.

Intel just bought a ton of random stuff that had nothing to do with it's core business, nor did it synergize in any way with their processors, and then inserted their overbloated management bureacreacy on top of it, and then were shocked when the competition destroyed them.

AMD entering networking without a clear tangible connection to CPUs/GPUs would be pulling an intel - but I suspect they're just copying nvidia and making special nics to connect MIx servers together.
Oh God, this brings back the PTSD of seeing Intel buying McAfee for $7.68 billion in 2010. Yes, they did sell it for $14 billion in 2021 to private equity but that rough $7.7 billion would have been very useful in 2010 for investing into say the smartphone chip business and getting serious about Atom or a serious and slow jump into GPUs. I knew back in 2010 that this was a stupid purchase.

And whatever did Intel do with Mobileye? That was an important $15 billion in 2017 and I don't see what strategic value Intel got with that money. Still didn't invest in GPUs then which looks even more stupid now.
Posted on Reply
#21
pmrdij
mechtechhmmm

ya that i225 i226 debacle didn't help things...........
FYI our group has zilch to do with retail desktop solutions like those two. Only I2XX NEX was responsible for is the I210.
Posted on Reply
#22
Panther_Seraphin
This is scary writing IMO.

Intel Networking was the KING not long ago and are still very good pieces of equipment in most areas, just a shame about the 225/226 debacle.

The fact this is being considered makes me think the situation in Intel is FAR worse than people want to let on.
Posted on Reply
#23
Dr_b_
Just bought an E610-XT2, ill let you know how it goes. omg intel lol. Was expecting a lot more innovation at a brisker pace, waiting this long for a marginally improved 10G adapter is odd.
Posted on Reply
#24
trparky
Panther_SeraphinThe fact this is being considered makes me think the situation in Intel is FAR worse than people want to let on.
I agree. Something is very rotten inside the halls of Intel.
Posted on Reply
#25
Panther_Seraphin
trparkyI agree. Something is very rotten inside the halls of Intel.
What I think is quite telling as well is the really slow adoption of anything >100 Gbps

They have JUST gotten a 200Gbps product out at the same time as AMD releasing a 400Gbps product and nVidia is releasing 800Gbps products
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 2nd, 2025 02:17 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts