Wednesday, August 15th 2007

New HDMI Xbox 360 Premium Still 90nm

Gamers have been hoping for a while now that Microsoft would introduce a 65nm chip into the new HDMI Xbox 360 Premium's, but a recent dissection of one proves it hasn't happened yet. The recently released photographs show the same 90nm Zephyr Xenon CPU and motherboard layout as in the Xbox 360 Elite, instead of the 65nm Falcon so many had been hopefully anticipating. The Falcon is still expected to emerge sometime this fall.

Pictures courtesy of NeoGAF
Source: DailyTech.com
Add your own comment

24 Comments on New HDMI Xbox 360 Premium Still 90nm

#1
HookeyStreet
Eat, sleep, game!
Still no 65nm Falcon CPU!! M$ are taking the p!ss now :mad:
Posted on Reply
#2
freaksavior
To infinity ... and beyond!
hooky, you waiting for 65 to buy one/another?
Posted on Reply
#3
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
can you oc those 360s?
Posted on Reply
#4
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
I would think you could do a little ocing of the 360. However liquid cooling would be the logical choice for maintaining temps.
Posted on Reply
#5
HookeyStreet
Eat, sleep, game!
freaksaviorhooky, you waiting for 65 to buy one/another?
Quite possibly m8, I like the sound of the cooler running CPU (and the performance boost it should give, albeit very slight)
Posted on Reply
#6
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
I'm waiting for the 65nm switch before buying a 360.
Posted on Reply
#7
error_f0rce
cdawallcan you oc those 360s?
LOL, that's the last thing you'd want to do with all the heat warped pcb boards popping off processors :laugh:
I'm hoping they fixed that problem with this release though...
Posted on Reply
#8
kwchang007
cdawallcan you oc those 360s?
Just a question, why? Low ram on consoles make running traditional operating systems and games very hard to do. Maybe if you wanted to fold with these things. You'd have to find the bios somewhere, wherever they lock it away. Even then when you're using the console for console games, you're not going to get fps above what you can notice with the eye, unless it's an improperly designed game with slow downs. Since consoles are all standardized they all should run at the proper frame rates for game play, not like computers where you have different components which is why computer games have visual options and such.
Posted on Reply
#9
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
kwchang007Just a question, why? Low ram on consoles make running traditional operating systems and games very hard to do. Maybe if you wanted to fold with these things. You'd have to find the bios somewhere, wherever they lock it away. Even then when you're using the console for console games, you're not going to get fps above what you can notice with the eye, unless it's an improperly designed game with slow downs. Since consoles are all standardized they all should run at the proper frame rates for game play, not like computers where you have different components which is why computer games have visual options and such.
I wouldn't say that, the older Xbox consoles benifits from a processor upgrade doubling the speed from 700MHz to 1.4GHz. The load times in the later games were noticeably decreased by doing this, and framerates in heavily populated games like Dynasty Warriors were also noticeably improved.
Posted on Reply
#10
HookeyStreet
Eat, sleep, game!
newtekie1Dynasty Warranties
Dont you mean, Dynasty Warriors ??? Or am I missing something :confused:
Posted on Reply
#11
jocksteeluk
since the xbox use power pc chips do you think it would be possible to run an older version mac osx on it?
Posted on Reply
#12
kwchang007
jocksteeluksince the xbox use power pc chips do you think it would be possible to run an older version mac osx on it?
Possibly, google it if your interesting. I can guarntee it's not legal and can f up your 360
Posted on Reply
#13
pbmaster
Yeah, considering then can detect a different DVD drive, they can probably detect a completely different OS lol
Posted on Reply
#14
Dippyskoodlez
HookeyStreetStill no 65nm Falcon CPU!! M$ are taking the p!ss now :mad:
Why is everyone overlooking the fact that early die shrink equivilants of larger CPU's...... suck?



Lets ignore history, smaller is better! YAYZ!

:wtf:

Yes its cheaper.

That doesn't always mean its doing better.

Everyone forgets you have to re-cast the die, and redo bits of it because of the shrink. Its not like you can pop open autocad, and go to edit->Process size->65nm. LOL

We have a mature 90nm process, and an infant 65nm process still.
Posted on Reply
#15
error_f0rce
DippyskoodlezWe have a mature 90nm process, and an infant 65nm process still.
That's true, however, unless they want to get left in the dust, they will need to start development with a newer more powerful processor eventually (not saying it has to be a 65nm Falcon, but something). PS3 is experiencing something like this with the "infant" (or maybe "toddler" now?) cell chip. But sacrifices must be made for the sake of progress, correct? If they want to start dominating the gaming market, they'll have to adopt a better processor, and it will probably end up being a 65nm IMO. .... what if they went quad-core?! :eek: :twitch: ............. nah, too pricy right now :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#16
Dippyskoodlez
error_f0rceThat's true, however, unless they want to get left in the dust, they will need to start development with a newer more powerful processor eventually (not saying it has to be a 65nm Falcon, but something). PS3 is experiencing something like this with the "infant" (or maybe "toddler" now?) cell chip. But sacrifices must be made for the sake of progress, correct? If they want to start dominating the gaming market, they'll have to adopt a better processor, and it will probably end up being a 65nm IMO. .... what if they went quad-core?! :eek: :twitch: ............. nah, too pricy right now
No you aren't seeing the point of the die shrink...

The Cell was designed for the process size its being made for.

Designing a CPU for an advanced process size is one thing, but shrinking and already existing, and working die, is more involved than just hitting the shrink button in photoshop.

It'll be cheaper(once it works), but its likely the early yield numbers from wafers are worse than the 90nm dies.

Not only must they maintain a very high clockspeed, but they have to remain fully functional on all of the cores.

How many 3Ghz 65nm CPU's did AMD toss out? :p
Posted on Reply
#17
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
HookeyStreetDont you mean, Dynasty Warriors ??? Or am I missing something :confused:
Yeah, fixed it, thanks. That is what happens when you try to hold a conversation with someone while typing a message.:roll:
Posted on Reply
#18
error_f0rce
DippyskoodlezNo you aren't seeing the point of the die shrink...
I think I understand where you're coming from... people want to shrink the die for the sake of shrinking the die... circular reasoning, correct?
Yes, I agree, this is foolish.

However, I think at this point MS should be looking for any way to reduce the heat output that has been frying 1 in 3 Xbox 360's, even if that includes a 65nm or 45nm chip, that could have other potential problems. Just from a business and consumer PR stand point.... just my opinion :)
Posted on Reply
#19
Dippyskoodlez
error_f0rceHowever, I think at this point MS should be looking for any way to reduce the heat output that has been frying 1 in 3 Xbox 360's, even if that includes a 65nm or 45nm chip, that could have other potential problems.
I believe it costs around $10k or more in materials just to recast a CPU die.

Changes things a bit now, doesn't it?
Posted on Reply
#20
error_f0rce
DippyskoodlezI believe it costs around $10k or more in materials just to recast a CPU die.

Changes things a bit now, doesn't it?
Expensive..... but when compared to the $1 billion they had to spend to fix the problem? ;)
Posted on Reply
#21
okdoke
XBox 360 El HDMI HDCP MP3 Audio LOCKOUT

I tried an Elite plugged to a Viewsonic 3751w HDMI with HDMI in from the El. I have an older dvd of a two hour MP3 streamed radio broadcast which has no copyright markings. The first time through all was ok. Later the audio could not be heard but all indicators were on as if the disk was being read but the audio was turned off. I played the disk on a 360 no problem. When I returned the El I asked the techies to test it with my disk. They refused and gave me my money back. The El did not produce any noticable quality increase over the 360. The HDCP issue is not looking good. What are the Displayport schedules? Any testing?
Posted on Reply
#22
Dippyskoodlez
error_f0rceExpensive..... but when compared to the $1 billion they had to spend to fix the problem? ;)
Thats going to be paid regardless.

That $10k is a development cost.

the $1b is unavoidable no matter what they do at this point. Shipping 65nm units is going to only add to that bill.

With AMD only begining to introduce 65nm stuff, I doubt they're just having a "happy time" with 65nm production.
Posted on Reply
#23
error_f0rce
Does anyone know what steps have been taken to eliminate the heat problem in the newer models?
Posted on Reply
#24
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
DippyskoodlezThats going to be paid regardless.

That $10k is a development cost.

the $1b is unavoidable no matter what they do at this point. Shipping 65nm units is going to only add to that bill.

With AMD only begining to introduce 65nm stuff, I doubt they're just having a "happy time" with 65nm production.
But continuing to ship 90nm parts is only adding to that $1 Billion because more problem units are going out the door, and will quickly surpass the $10K mark.

They are going to move to 65nm eventually anyway, we already know that, so the $10k is going to happen regardless too, so you might as well get it over with early and stop sending out problem units that are just going to come back to bite you in the ass.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 10th, 2025 02:18 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts