Tuesday, February 26th 2008
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Scores 14K in 3DMark06
After taking some screenshots with a special version of our GPU-Z utility, the guys over at Expreview have decided to take their GeForce 9800 GTX sample and give it a try at Futuremark 3DMark06. Using Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 @ 3GHz, 2GB of DDR2 memory, ASUS Maximus Formula X38 and a single GeForce 9800 GTX @ 675/1688/1100MHz the result is 14014 marks.
Source:
Expreview
114 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Scores 14K in 3DMark06
The number 9800, as in the Radeon 9800 :respect:, when ATI smacked nVidia around with their R300-series core.
Now that nVidia's using this nomenclature, it does not bode well for them.
Just wondering.
What I want to know is: why wasn't the 8800 GT called the 9800 GT first? Wasn't it a completely different core from the rest of the 8800's? (old GTS, GTX, etc.)
"Don't bother getting upset with the 256-bit memory bus because it will not become any kind of bottleneck. The only time it might be even close to that is when you're pouring liquid nitrogen into the container and have the GPU running at +50% of stock frequency, which will happen though."
Nvidia should name it 8900GTX if this is actually true...
If they don't do something soon about future cards and releases, they might, no wait will, find themselves behind in competition with the red camp.
EDIT: Speaking of the 9800GX2 and theory, I wonder how these cards would scale in SLI? Better than previous cards maybe?
But who knows, 3 9800GTX cards might beat 2 HD3870X2 cards, until we see the actual card releases and what they do in Tri-SLI we won't know. How so? Because ATi has a card out on the market that is in the top spot? Remember, that card uses two cores to achieve that. NVidia still has the fastest single core on the market, and will soon have the fastest double core also. So I don't see why you are saying ATi will have nVidia beat. I'll believe that when ATi can produce a single core that can outpace nVidia's single core. Not a double cored card outpacing a single.
I hope ATi pulls something out now, like that quad crossfire that they talked about for a while, or 3 way crossfire on nvidia chipsets or something. Its not going to happen, but it would be good to see AMD/ATi getting ahold of the market again, seeing as how they are worth less than what ATi was bought for now.
The 9800GX2 will compete with the 3870X2, in fact it should hand the 38070X2 its ass, assuming the recent specs "leaked" are true. It will probably cost more too, but performance comes at a price. The 3870X2 costs more then the 8800GTS512 too, and is the only offering from ATi that can outperform it.
I see the Gt is now $200, Im gald Nvidia is bringing there (Lower-highend) price to a competitve point. I would think the 9800GX2 will perform 400-800 points better at stock than a 3870x2, (These numbers have no baring, just a gut feeling) but Its cost will be much higher.
I still give ATi props for spearheading the pricedrop with the 38xx series
this worked very well.. but now the two fake 8800 card are being presented in their proper place its not looking so good..
the 8800gt being presented as the new 9600 is clever but the 9800 cards are just a let down.. they have to be.. there is nothing left in the hat to pull out..
also ati didnt cheat.. producing the same performance for half the power draw and heat is a new generation chip.. with multiple gpus heat and power draw is the key factor..
trog