Saturday, July 12th 2008

Bloodbath for AMD at the Stock-Markets, Company Struggles to Survive

Sure, the graphics division brings some cheer for the company but seriously, to what extent is it helping the company alongside a marginally increased market-share with processors? Not much. AMD struggles to survive as stocks plummet below the $6 mark at NASDAQ index, which was priced at $15 /share only a year ago; this is the lowest value for the AMD stock since 2002.

AMD's survival is crucial for the entire computing industry as it keeps check on inflating prices by major players such as Intel and NVIDIA (who themselves are seeing bad days at the stock-markets these days). It has immense engineering potential to take on major players and force them to slash their prices. There are talks already doing rounds of CEO Hector Ruiz planning to quit.

Market forces and mal-informed consumerism are also to blame. A person chooses competitive brands over AMD products mainly because they're supplied and marketed better, sure Intel and NVIDIA do make better products in many categories but 'better' is a very relative value, how much better and for how much more (price) is something that keeps fluctuating, again fluctuations are mainly triggered by competition that AMD brings into the market. In other words, thank AMD for making NVIDIA sell GeForce 8800 GT for as low as $120 or better still, giving rise to a whole new SKU, the GeForce 9800 GTX+, with the '+' matching the red cross on first-aid kits.
Source: Yahoo Finance
Add your own comment

116 Comments on Bloodbath for AMD at the Stock-Markets, Company Struggles to Survive

#101
Ketxxx
Heedless Psychic
Jelle MeesLook, in order for AMD to compete with Intel, they have to release CPU's that are as fast or can be as fast when overclocked, and that's not the case. In many shops the Black Edition CPU's are more expensive then the Q6600 and E8400 and they can not be overclocked to the same speeds.

The Phenoms are a joke. Released such a long time after the intel Q CPU's and they are slower and can not be overclocked as high. Sorry. But only a fanboy or a ignorant consumer would go for AMD at this time.

I would love it if AMD was better, they just arent, you know that very well.
I wasn't arguing any of that. Stop being so ignorant yourself. If you care to look at my sys spec, you'll see I'm an intel user :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#102
yogurt_21
I wouldn't call a drop from $5.23 to $4.84 or an 8% drop a "bloodbath" more like an resulting drop fram a straving economy. nv's drop from $18 to $12 or 34% was more of a "bloodbath" but the market is bad right now which means predicitons about companies stock are alos bad one right now disney is down, intel is down, ibm is down. I hardly call this news worthy. In fact, you've stolen 5 minutes of my life and I want them back!
Posted on Reply
#103
Megasty
yogurt_21I wouldn't call a drop from $5.23 to $4.84 or an 8% drop a "bloodbath" more like an resulting drop fram a straving economy. nv's drop from $18 to $12 or 34% was more of a "bloodbath" but the market is bad right now which means predicitons about companies stock are alos bad one right now disney is down, intel is down, ibm is down. I hardly call this news worthy. In fact, you've stolen 5 minutes of my life and I want them back!
:roll:

Its definitely not a bloodbath, more like losing a few fingers or a hand. On the other hand, NV is dying in a pool of their own blood. But NV is a vampire that suck the lifeblood from other companies as well as unknowing consumers. They'll always come back to life :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#104
Triprift
Lol someones getting carried away just cus a companies successful doesnt mean there evil :p
Posted on Reply
#105
JRMBelgium
TripriftLol someones getting carried away just cus a companies successful doesnt mean there evil :p
Nvidia is evil. They renamed the Geforce 8 products as Geforce 9 cards. In my book, that's pure evil :)
Posted on Reply
#106
jcfougere
If anyone knows how to go about buying some stocks in AMD, please send me an email:

jcfougere@gmail.com


AMd is turning heads with this round in graphics, which will secure investors. Stocks this low are begging to be bought, I want to take the risk and ride with them! :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#107
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
Im not too worried about it. I think Ill divert like 30% of my 401k stock buying into AMD stock. As low as it is, and when they get increases, Ill increase my net worth :D
Posted on Reply
#108
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
If they go out of business its simply because of a lack of marketing and securing deals with OEM's also if they focused on making a strong lineup of midrange cpu's for OEM's they would be in a better position. Also is there such thing as an AMD advertisement.
Posted on Reply
#109
Megasty
In the past week, I've already bought 500 shares of AMD. I should buy another 500, too damn dirt cheap :shadedshu

I'm still waiting for NV to reach the bottom of the pit so I can sop some dough in them as well.
Posted on Reply
#110
candle_86
first off AMD CPU's do not suck at all. The E4xxx, E1xxx and E2xxx are all beat by AMD chips at stock speeds thanks to cache nutering. Under 100 bucks AMD is the better buy if you can't OC because of board limits be it OEM or budget board, or you just dont care about overclocking, in that respect AKA 90% of the market will never overclock so AMD is a better buy right there.
Posted on Reply
#111
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
candle_86first off AMD CPU's do not suck at all. The E4xxx, E1xxx and E2xxx are all beat by AMD chips at stock speeds thanks to cache nutering. Under 100 bucks AMD is the better buy if you can't OC because of board limits be it OEM or budget board, or you just dont care about overclocking, in that respect AKA 90% of the market will never overclock so AMD is a better buy right there.
I didn't mean they sucked I mean that the quad phenom should have been marketed and priced to compete with the q6600 which is beginning to be sold in OEM pc's but I haven't seen any phenoms sold at for example pcworld, curry's and comet which sell almost intel exclusively.
Posted on Reply
#112
Wile E
Power User
candle_86first off AMD CPU's do not suck at all. The E4xxx, E1xxx and E2xxx are all beat by AMD chips at stock speeds thanks to cache nutering. Under 100 bucks AMD is the better buy if you can't OC because of board limits be it OEM or budget board, or you just dont care about overclocking, in that respect AKA 90% of the market will never overclock so AMD is a better buy right there.
No, the the E2*** and E4*** series don't lose to the AMD in the same price target. Only the E1*** series does.
Posted on Reply
#114
Megasty
bah, I just sold mine & made 49 cent a share :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#115
Jansku07
Thats gr8 man! =) Got a lot of AMD stock?
Posted on Reply
#116
Megasty
Jansku07Thats gr8 man! =) Got a lot of AMD stock?
only about 2.8 grand worth, don't want to see it go down the tube with this lawsuit bs floating around...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 11:28 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts